Abstract
Lyn Carter. While science and science education might well be aware of their own methodological and epistemological preconditions, they are wilfully oblivious to their political, economic and social ones. Exposing the political economies shaping science education’s enactment not only explodes its mythical apolitical status but works towards re-envisioning a hopeful science education at a moment when humanity and the planet face converging and conflicting crises. As science education remains a liberal democratic project of the mid-twentieth century and early neoliberalism, this chapter charts a genealogy of liberalism’s and democracy’s embedded philosophical and political assumptions and contingencies, and their deterioration into the post liberal and post democratic futures. The genealogy focuses firstly, on the birth of Western liberalism during the Scientific Revolution and Enlightenment and secondly, on democracy on the in the 20th /21st centuries, and their shaping of science education. Post liberalism and post democracy with their increasing authoritarianism, platform capitalism and inequalities offer profound challenges to contemporary science education.
How did we end up in a world when a child should govern an old man an imbecile should lead a wise man and a handful of people should gorge themselves with superfluities while the hungry multitude goes in want of necessities? Jean-Jacque Rousseau, Second Discourse (1755, p. 137).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agamben, G. (2005). State of exception (K. Attell, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.
Barrinha, A., & Renard, T. (2020). Power and diplomacy in the post-liberal cyberspace. International Affairs, 96. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz274
Bauman, Z. (2001). The great war of recognition. Theory into Practice, 18(2–3), 137–150.
Bazzul, J. (2012). Neoliberal ideology, global capitalism, and science education: Engaging the question of subjectivity. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(4), 1001–1020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9413-3
Beddeleem, M. (2020). Recoding liberalism: Philosophy and sociology of science against planning. In D. Plehwe, Q. Slobodian, & P. Mirowski (Eds.), Nine Lives of Neoliberalism (pp. 21–45). Verso.
Bhambra, G. (2021). A polity divided: Empire, nation, and the construction of the British welfare state. The Annual British Journal of Sociology Lecture. London School of Economics and Politics. Retrieved from https://www.lse.ac.uk/lse-player?id=cd669ce6-f06c-4cfa-aa1e-e5d497df9fcd
Birch, K. (2015). Neoliberalism: The whys and wherefores … and future directions. Sociology Compass, 9(7), 571–584.
Blainey, G. (2010). A brief history of BHP Billiton. Journal of Australasian Mining History, 8, 23–35.
Bruff, I. (2014). The rise of authoritarian neoliberalism. Rethinking Marxism, 26(1), 113–129.
Carter, L. (2002). Thinking at the limits. Globalisation, postcolonialism and science education (Unpublished PhD thesis). Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
Carter, L. (2008). Globalisation and science education: The implications for science in the new economy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 617–633.
Carter, L. (2017a). National innovation policy and public science in Australia. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12(4), 929–942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9843-z
Carter, L. (2017b). Neoliberalism and STEM education: Some Australian policy discourse. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 17(4), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2017.1380868
Carter, L. (2018). STEM Education as a GERM: Reviewing Australia’s STEM discourse. In J. Zajda (Ed.), Globalisation education reforms (pp. 79–91). Springer.
Carter, L. (2020). What’s in a name: Post-liberalism, COVID-19 and science (education). Journal for Activist Science and Technology Education (JASTE), 11(2), 16–32.
Carter, L. (2021). The rise of neoliberalism and the changing emphasis on what is valued in science education. In W. Melville & D. Kerr (Eds.), Virtues, science and science education. Routledge.
Change, C. (2020). The NAZI inspiring Chinese Communists. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2020/12/nazi-china-communists-carl-schmitt/617237/
Chomsky, N. (1999). Profit over people: Neoliberalism and the global order. Seven Stories Press.
Claudio. (2021). Liberalism vs Autocrats in SE Asia. RN Late Night Live. https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/latenightlive/liberal-se-asia/13253976
Coleman, D. (1987). Pettigrew, Andrew M., “The awakening giant: Continuity and change in imperial chemical industries” (Book Review). Business History Review, 61(1), 175.
Cooper, M. (2017). Family values: Between neoliberalism and the new social conservatism. Princeton University Press.
Crafts, N., & Fearon, P. (2010). Lessons from the 1930s great depression. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 26(3), 285–317.
Crouch, C. (2004). Post-democracy. Polity Press.
Curtis, A. (2021). Adam Curtis. Talking politics. https://www.talkingpoliticspodcast.com/blog/2021/314-adam-curtis
Davies, W. (2016). The new neoliberalism. New Left Review. https://newleftreview.org/
Davies, W. (2018). Is Neoliberalism still going according to plan? (Le néolibéralisme suit-il encore un plan?). A response to ‘Hell is Truth Seen Too Late’ by Philip Mirowski. Zilsel Science, Technique, Société, 1(3), 189–196.
Davis, W. (2017). Elite power under advanced neoliberalism. Theory, Culture & Society, 34(5–6), 227–250.
Davis, A., & Williams, K. (2017). Introduction: Elites and power after financialization. Theory, Culture & Society, 34(5–6), 3–26.
Deneen, P. J. (2018). Why liberalism failed. Yale University Press.
Duncan, S. (2021). Thomas Hobbes. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hobbes/
Dunn, J. (2021). Democracy: Clarifying the muddle. New Books Network. Retrieved from https://newbooksnetwork.com/dunn
Duncombe, C., & Dunne, T. (2018). After the liberal world order. International Affairs, 94(1), 25–42.
Elliott, J. (1994). Joseph A. Schumpeter and the theory of democracy. Review of Social Economy, 52(4), 280–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/758523325
Featherstone, M. (2020). Problematizing the global: An introduction to global culture revisited. Theory, Culture & Society, 37(7–8), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276420957715
Fensham, P. J. (1992). Science and technology. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Curriculum (pp. 789–829). Macmillan Education Pty Ltd.
Filner, R. (1977). The social relations of science movement (SRS) and J. B. S. Haldane. Science & Society, 41(3), 303–316.
Flew, T. (2014). Six theories of neoliberalism. Thesis Eleven, 122(1), 49–71.
Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collége de France, 1978–1979 (Ed. M. Senellart). Palgrave Macmillan.
Fraser, N. (2017). From progressive neoliberalism to trump – And beyond. American Affairs, 1(4), 46–64.
Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. Free Press.
Fuller, S. (2000). The Governance of science: Ideology and the future of society. Open University Press.
Ganesha, S. (2018). ‘Identifying with the aggressor’: From the authoritarian to neoliberal personality. Constellations, 25, 147–164.
Gilbert, J. (2013). What kind of thing is neoliberalism? New Formations, 80–81, 7–22.
Gramsci, A. (1930/1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. Nowell- Smith, Ed. and Trans.). Lawrence & Wishart.
Griffin, L., Wallace, M., & Rubin, B. (1986). Capitalist resistance to the organization of labor before the new deal: Why? How? Success? American Sociological Review, 51(2), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095513
Hammersley, M. (2021). Karl Mannheim’s ideology and Utopia and the public role of sociology. Journal of Classical Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X20986382
Havertz, R. (2018). Right-wing populism and neoliberalism in Germany: The AfD’s embrace of Ordoliberalism. New Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2018.1484715
Hayek, F. A. (1944). The road to serfdom. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. (1988). The Fatal Conceit. University of Chicago Press.
Helleiner, E. (2011). Understanding the 2007–2008 Global Financial Crisis: Lessons for scholars of international political economy. Annual Review of Political Science, 14(1), 67–87.
Hobbes, T. (1996). Hobbes: Leviathan. Revised student edition. In R. Tuck (Ed.), Cambridge texts in the history of political thought. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808166
Innset, O. (2020). Reinventing liberalism. The politics, philosophy and economics of early neoliberalism (1920–1947). Springer.
Jahn, B. (2021). “World on the Edge”: The crisis of the Western liberal order. London School of Economics and Politics. Retrieved from https://www.lse.ac.uk/lse-player?id=168d8077-b7df-4eea-92c3-2767407d020
Jasanoff, S. (2021). Between blind faith and denial: Finding a productive approach to merging policy, science and technology. Harvard Kennedy School Policycast. Retrieved from https://www.hks.harvard.edu/more/policycast/between-blind-faith-and-denial-finding-productive-approach-integrating-policy
Jennings, R. (1988). Reviewed work: Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life by Steven Shapin, Simon Schaffer. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 39(3), 403–410.
Jones, E. (2010). The Chicago School, Hayek and the Mont Pelerin society. Journal of Australian Political Economy, 65, 138–154.
Kallio, J. (2021). ‘Confucianism’ and China. New Books Network. Retrieved from https://newbooksnetwork.com/confucianism-and-china-with-jyrki-kallio
Kaufman, A. (2010). The ‘Century of Humiliation’, then and now: Changing Chinese perceptions of the international order. Pacific Focus, 25(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1976-5118.2010.01039.x
Klein, S. (2020). The world of politics: Making a democratic welfare society. Cambridge University Press.
Kraynak, R. (1990). History and modernity in the thought of Thomas Hobbes. Cornell University Press.
Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316.
Lin, A. C. (2019). President trump’s war on regulatory science. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 43(2), 247–306.
Lin, D., & Trevaskes, S. (2019). Creating a virtuous leviathan: The party, law, and socialist core values. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 6(1), 41–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2018.41
Marcuzzo, M. C. (2010). Whose welfare state: Beveridge versus Keynes. In R. Backhouse & T. Nishizawa (Eds.), No wealth but life: Welfare economics and the welfare state in Britain 1880–1945 (pp. 189–206). Cambridge University Press.
Mason, L. (2021). How identity politics took over the Republican party. The Ezra Klein Show. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/13/opinion/ezra-klein-podcast-lilliana-mason.html
McAdam, M. (2012). Dead end on The Road to Serfdom? On Hayek’s reception post-World War II (Unpublished MSc. thesis). Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany. Retrieved from https://medialibrary.uantwerpen.be/oldcontent/container42730/files/McAdam-368340.pdf
McManus, M. (2020). A critical legal examination of liberalism and liberal rights. Palgrave MacMillan.
Mirowski, P. (2011). Science-mart: Privatizing American science. Harvard University Press.
Mirowski, P. (2013). Never let a serious crisis go to waste: How neoliberalism survived the financial meltdown. Verso Books.
Mirowski, P. (2019). Hell is truth seen too late. boundary 2, 46(1), 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1215/01903659-7271327
Mirowski, P. (2020). Never let a serious crisis go to waste politics. Politics Theory Other #85. Retrieved from https://soundcloud.com/poltheoryother/85-never-let-a-serious-crisis-go-to-waste-w-philip-mirowski
Mirowski, P., & Nik-Khah, E. (2017). The knowledge we have lost in information: The history of information in modern economics. Oxford University Press.
Mirowski, P., & Plehwe, D. (Eds.). (2009). The road from Mont Pèlerin: The making of the neoliberal thought collective. Harvard University Press.
Morrow, R. (2010). A critical analysis of the US causes of the Global Financial Crisis of 2007–2008. Australian Marxist Review, 53. Retrieved from https://archive.cpa.org.au/amr/53/index.html
Moseley, F. (1991). The falling rate of profit in the post-war United States economy. St. Martin’s Press.
Nederveen Pieterse, J. (2020). Global culture, 1990, 2020. Theory, Culture & Society, 37(7–8), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276420958447
Orwell, G. (1949). 1984. Signet Classic.
Owen, G., & Harrison, T., (1995). Why ICI chose to demerge. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/1995/03/why-ici-chose-to-demerge
Paris, R. (2020). The right to dominate: How old ideas about sovereignty pose new challenge for world order. International Organization, 74(3), 453–489. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000077
Peck, J., & Nik, T. (2019). Still neoliberalism? South Atlantic Quarterly, 118(2), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-7381122
Peck, J., Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2018). Actually existing neoliberalism. In D. Cahill, M. Cooper, M. Konings, & D. Primrose (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of neoliberalism (pp. 3–15). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Piketty, T. (2015). Capital in the twenty-first century. Belknap Press.
Piketty, T. (2020). Capital and ideology (A. Goldhammer, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Piketty, T. (2021). A brief history of inequality. London School of Economics and Politics. https://www.lse.ac.uk/Events/2021/03/202103101600/Piketty
Plehwe, D. (2020). Schumpeter revival? How neoliberals revised the image of the entrepreneur. In D. Plehwe, Q. Slobodian, & P. Mirowski (Eds.), Nine Lives of Neoliberalism (pp. 120–142). Verso.
Pühringer, S., & Walter, O. O. (2018). Neoliberalism and right-wing populism: Conceptual analogies. Forum for Social Economics, 47(2), 193–203.
Repucci, S., & Slipowitz, A. (2020). Democracy under lockdown. The impact of COVID-19 on the global struggle for freedom. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/report/special-report/2020/democracy-under-lockdown
Robinson, M. (2020). Marilynne Robinson on writing, metaphysics, and the Donald Trump dilemma. The Ezra Klein Show, Vox. Retrieved from https://www.vox.com/2020/10/15/21517358/democracy-neoliberalism-predestination-loneliness-the-ezra-klein-show
Rothman, H., Glasner, P., & Adams, C. (1996). Proteins, plants and currents: Rediscovering science in Britain. In A. Irwin & B. Wynne (Eds.), Misunderstanding science. The public reconstruction of science and technology (pp. 191–211). Cambridge University Press.
Rousseau, J-J. (2018/1755). The Discourses and other early political writings. In V. Gourevitch (Ed.). Cambridge texts in the history of political thought. Cambridge University Press.
Roy, B. (2021). Rencontres avec Marie-Ève Maillé et avec Damien Contandriopoulos. SpuLien, Juin.
Rubin, J. (2021). Joe Biden’s new new deal. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/03/15/joe-bidens-new-new-deal/
Rudd, K. (2009). The global financial crisis. The Monthly. Retrieved from https://www.themonthly.com.au/issue/2009/february/1319602475/kevin-rudd/global-financial-crisis
Runciman, D. (2020). Hobbes on the State. Talking politics: The history of ideas. Retrieved from https://play.acast.com/s/history-of-ideas/hobbesonthestate
Runciman, D. (2021a). Questions and answers. Talking politics: The history of ideas. Retrieved from https://play.acast.com/s/history-of-ideas/historyofideasqanda
Runciman, D. (2021b). Schmitt on friend vs enemy. Talking politics: The history of ideas. Retrieved from https://play.acast.com/s/history-of-ideas/schmittonfriendvsenemy
Runciman, D. (2021c). Schumpeter on democracy. Talking politics: The history of ideas. Retrieved from https://play.acast.com/s/history-of-ideas/schumpeterondemocracy
Salmela, M., & von Scheve, C. (2017). Emotional roots of right-wing political populism. Social Science Information, 56(4), 567–595.
Scheuerman, W. E. (2006). Survey article: Emergency powers and the rule of law after 9/11. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(1), 61–84.
Scheuerman, W. E. (2019). Donald Trump meets Carl Schmitt. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 45(9–10), 1170–1185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453719872285
Scheuerman, W. E. (2021). Carl Schmitt’s comeback? Understanding Trump and global authoritarianism. Retrieved from https://publicseminar.org/essays/carl-schmitts-comeback/
Schmitt, C. (2007). The concept of the political. Expanded Edition (1932) (G. Schwab, Trans.). University of Chicago Pres.
Schulz-Forberg, H. (2020). Embedded early neoliberalism: Transnational origins of the agenda of liberalism reconsidered. In D. Plehwe, Q. Slobodian, & P. Mirowski (Eds.), Nine Lives of Neoliberalism (pp. 169–196). Verso.
Shafik, M. (2021). What we owe each other: A new social contract for a better society. Princeton University Press.
Shapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (2011/1986). Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton University Press.
Shapiro, B. (2020). Bruce Shapiro’s America. RN Late Night Live. https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/latenightlive/bruce-shapiros-america/12736856
Shearmur, J. (1981). Popper, Hayek, and classical liberalism Foundation of economic education. Foundation for Economic Education. Retrieved from https://fee.org/articles/popper-hayek-and-classical-liberalism.
Shearmur, J. (2018). Hayek and the Methodenstreit at the LSE. Globalizations, 15(7), 1033–1044. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2018.1498177
Silverman, D. (1993). Fantasy and reality in Nazi work-creation programs, 1933–1936. The Journal of Modern History, 65(1), 113–151.
Simpson, J. (2019). Permanent Revolution: The Reformation and the illiberal roots of liberalism. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Sklair, L. (1970). The political sociology of science: A critique of current orthodoxies. The Sociological Review, 18(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1970.tb03175.x
Slobodian, Q., & Plehwe, D. (2020). Introduction. In D. Plehwe, Q. Slobodian, & P. Mirowski (Eds.), Nine Lives of Neoliberalism (pp. 1–19). Verso.
Slomp, G. (2008). Thomas Hobbes. Routledge.
Smith, D. V. (2011). One brief, shining moment? The impact of neo-liberalism on science curriculum in the compulsory years of schooling. International Journal of Science Education, 33(9), 1273–1288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.512368
Smith, C., & Dawborn, K. (2011). Permaculture pioneers: Stories from the new frontier. Holmgren Design Service.
Steger, M., & James, P. (2020). Disjunctive globalization in the era of the great unsettling. Theory, Culture & Society, 37(7–8), 187–203.
Steger, M., & Roy, R. (2021). Neoliberalism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
Swedberg, R. (2013). Joseph A. Schumpeter: His life and work. Polity Press.
Szubanski, M. (2015). Reckoning: A memoir. Text Publishing Company.
Thomsen, J. (1997). Carl Schmitt – The Hobbesian of the 20th Century? Social Thought & Research, 20(1/2), 5–28.
Torres-Olave, B., & Bravo González, P. (2021). Facing neoliberalism through dialogic spaces as sites of hope in science education: Experiences of two self-organised communities. Cultural Studies of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10042-y
Turkle, S (2021). The pandemic has shown us that people need relationships. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/science/2021/mar/21/sherry-turkle-the-pandemic-has-shown-us-that-people-need-relationship
Turner, S. (2007). Merton’s ‘norms’ in political and intellectual context. Journal of Classical Sociology, 7(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X07078034
Varma, R. (2000). Changing research cultures in U.S. industry. Science, Technology & Human Values, 25(4), 395–416.
Williams, J., & Tolbert, S. (2021). “They have a lot more freedom than they know”: Science education as a space for radical openness. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 16(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-020-10016-6
Wintour, P. (2021). US seen as bigger threat to democracy than Russia or China, global poll finds. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/may/05/us-threat-democracy-russia-china-global-poll
Ydesen, C. (Ed.). (2019). The OECD’s historical rise in education: The formation of a global governing complex. Palgrave Macmillan.
Zygmont, Z. (2006). Debating the socialist calculation debate: A classroom exercise. The Journal of Economic Education, 37(2), 229–235.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carter, L. (2023). Knowing Our Moment: (Neo)Liberalism, Democracy and Science (Education). In: Science Education Towards Social and Ecological Justice. Sociocultural Explorations of Science Education, vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39330-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39330-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-39329-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-39330-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)