Abstract
The subsurface oceans of icy moons, expected to retain appreciable concentrations of ammonia, are of significant interest to astrobiology. On Earth, ammonia is released in large quantities, primarily through anthropogenic activities. Ammonia is toxic to many forms of life at high concentrations, and thus it is necessary to understand the habitability impact of ammonia on these environments. The survival limits and physiological response of aerobic bacteria in ammonia, and whether ammonia toxicity is distinct from toxicity by high pH, is poorly understood. Here, we investigate the survival thresholds, growth kinetics, and metabolomic response of Halomonas meridiana in ammonia-water solutions and pH-matched sodium hydroxide solutions. Using closed- and open-air systems to mimic environments with NH3 retention or dispersion, we found complete and partial cell death above 0.05 M ammonia, respectively. In open-air systems, a sub-set of cells survived up to 0.25 M ammonia; metabolomics revealed unique physiological responses to ammonia, including elevation of cyclic compounds and Coenzyme A metabolites, suggesting mechanisms of ammonia toxicity and adaptation. Ammonia and high pH toxicity were found to be distinct. These findings show that ammonia can impose a distinct geobiological limit, potentially constraining the habitability of ammonia-rich terrestrial and extraterrestrial environments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Ammonia (hereafter considered as total ammonia, ammonia (NH3) + ammonium (NH4+)) is a primordial molecule, formed in the early universe and found abundantly in various environments including Earth’s early atmosphere and on other celestial bodies within the solar system1,2,3. Terrestrially, ammonia plays a critical role in the synthesis of amino acids and nucleic acids4,5, and has an integral role in the global nitrogen cycle6,7. Yet, despite biochemical significance, the toxicity of NH3 has been well-documented across the domains of life8,9,10,11. NH3 is gaseous under temperate conditions. The small size and non-polar properties of NH3 facilitates passive permeation through membranes12,13,14,15, causing significant intracellular disruption16,17,18. The equilibrium between NH3 and NH4+ is influenced by factors such as pH (with NH3 predominating at pH > 9.25), salinity and temperature19,20,21.
Mono Lake, California, underscores the role of NH3 in shaping microbial ecosystems; depth-dependent shifts in biodiversity are driven by the spatial distribution of abiotic factors including ammonia, which is predominately in the NH3 form22,23. This becomes relevant when considering the habitability of NH3-rich environments. Ammonia has been detected at a volume mixing ratio of 0.4–1.3% on the icy moon Enceladus, orbiting Saturn24,25. The evidence of a saline, liquid water subsurface ocean26,27, and other physicochemical conditions suitable for life28,29,30, has encouraged strong astrobiological interest in this satellite. With a pH predicted at or above 9 29,30, the ocean of Enceladus would bear appreciable amounts of toxic NH3. Due to the limited research on NH3 tolerance in bacteria, coupled with the presence of carbon dioxide and hydrogen in the ocean, habitability assessments of Enceladus are currently limited to methanogenic organisms31,32,33.
The habitability impacts of ammonia are also relevant terrestrially. Globally, several dozen tetragrams of ammonia are released annually from agriculture34,35. Ammonia deposition into soil, water and vegetation occurs as a consequence36,37,38. In alkaline soils (pH > 7), application of ammonium fertilizers leads to NH3 volatilization. Indeed, applied nitrogen losses of up to 66% have been recorded in alkaline soils as a result of ammonium fertilizer application39,40,41. Although toxicological effects are presumed, the downstream impact of NH3 volatilization on microbial diversity and community structures in alkaline environments, where the relative abundance of NH3 exceeds NH4+, is not well understood.
To accurately assess the habitability impacts of ammonia, fundamental questions remain. Few studies have systematically investigated the survival limits or physiology of microorganisms under NH3 stress, where both the concentration and relative abundance of NH3 is high. Bacteria such as Bacillus pasteurii can grow in up to 0.5 M NH3 42, although it is noted this species can utilise ammonia for ATP generation43, substrate permeability44 and oxidation of substrates45. Ammonia-oxidising bacteria (AOB) can metabolise both NH3 and NH4+ and can survive in up to 0.5 M ammonia at pH 6 46,47, but the concentration of NH3 in these solutions is minimal (NH3 ≈ 0.05%, ≤ 0.00025 M). Without specific adaptations, toxicity at 0.1 M ammonia (pH 9.5, NH3 > 50%) has been observed in B. subtilis and Escherichia coli. However, similar toxicity was noted in sodium chloride solutions of matching pH48. The use of neutrophilic organisms has thus far limited our understanding of whether ammonia toxicity is intrinsically pH-based. There is compelling need for research examining the survival limits and physiological response of an alkaline adapted bacteria in ammonia solutions exceeding pH 9.25 (NH3 > 50%) and comparing with a pH matched counterpart.
Here, we use a combination of growth kinetics and cell viability assays to identify habitability limits of Halomonas meridiana Slfth1 in ammonia solutions with high NH3 content. This organism lacks specific adaptations to ammonia49, but possesses alkalitolerant traits relevant for this investigation50. We utilise growth systems permitting (“open-air system”) or preventing (“closed-air system”) gaseous escape to mimic environments where NH3 is environmentally dispersed and retained, respectively. By using an alkaline adapted organism, we resolve that ammonia toxicity is independent from pH toxicity and, using microscopy and metabolomics analysis, define the specific toxicity effects of ammonia on bacterial physiology independent of pH. Together, these findings advance the understanding of ammonia toxicity and should foster improved habitability assessments of NH3-rich environments.
Results
Physicochemical properties of ammonia and pH-matched solutions
Ammonia solutions were prepared from liquid ammonia to molar concentrations of 0.01, 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5 and 1 M, equating to pH values between 8 and 11 (Fig. 1a). Positive control (PC) was unamended yeast media. The percentage abundance of NH3 to NH4+ at these concentrations and pH values is given in Fig. 1b. From concentrations of 0.05 M ammonia and higher, NH3 accounts for over 50% of the total NH3/NH4+ in solution. Solutions of increasing ammonia concentration showed decreased oxygen concentrations; however, this decrease was non-significant from pH-matched counterparts (Fig. 1c). Alterations to water activity with increasing ammonia and pH were also statistically non-significant (Fig. 1d).
Properties of ammonia and pH-matched solutions utilised in this study. (a) Molar levels of ammonia and corresponding pH values utilised in this study. The positive control (PC) corresponds to growth in unamended yeast media (0 M ammonia) without pH modifications. Column heights and error bars represent mean ± s.d. (n = 4). (b) Calculated percentage abundance of NH3/NH4+ in molar levels of ammonia utilised in this study. (c) Oxygen concentration and (d) water activity of ammonia and pH-matched solutions utilised in this study. The upper limit, middle line and lower limit of the boxplots indicate the 25th, 50th (median) and 75th percentiles, respectively. Whiskers represent 1.5× the interquartile ranges. Mean is indicated by a plus sign (+) (n = 4). Alterations to oxygen concentration and water activity were found to be non-significant between all ammonia and pH-matched counterparts. Significance is given by unpaired two-tailed t-tests or Mann-Whitney test at each pH. The statistical tests and outcomes are available in Supplementary Table 1.
Ammonia sets a distinct molarity threshold for viability and growth
Bacteria were grown in ammonia solutions utilising two system types: a ‘closed-air’ system – to determine growth limits in a perpetually ammonia exposed environment, and an ‘open-air’ system – to determine growth limits in an environment permitting NH3 dispersal following volatilization. Figure 2a shows the final colony forming units of H. meridiana after incubation in the closed-air system for 72 h. The closed-air system utilised an air-tight falcon tube for culture that was presumed to maintain constant ammonia concentrations by retention of both aqueous and volatilized ammonia. Colonies were evident following incubation in 0.01 M, 0.025 M and 0.05 M ammonia, but colony number decreased as NH3 increased relative to NH4+ (Fig. 1b). A lower number of viable colonies compared to positive control was observed in 0.01 M ammonia (p < 0.01). No significant difference in colony number was observed when H. meridiana was incubated in 0.025 M compared to positive control (p = 0.056) or 0.01 M ammonia (p = 0.323). This concentration of ammonia has a pH within the optimum range for H. meridiana (pH 9) (Fig. 1a). Lower viable cell numbers were observed when incubated in 0.05 M compared to positive control (p < 0.0001) and 0.025 M ammonia (p < 0.01). No viable colonies were present following incubation in 0.1 M ammonia or ammonia solutions of higher concentration (Fig. 2a).
Survival limits of H. meridiana in ammonia. (a) CFU/mL of H. meridiana grown in ammonia solutions at 0 (PC), 0.01, 0.025, 0.05 and 0.1 M in a closed system for 72 h. The positive control (PC) corresponds to growth in unamended yeast media (0 M ammonia) without pH modifications. Column heights and error bars represent mean ± s.d. (n = 3). Statistical significance is by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (F (4, 10) = 27.70, p < 0.0001). (b) Growth curve of H. meridiana over 48 h in increasing ammonia concentrations. Growth curves represent mean OD600 values over time ± s.d. (0-0.5 M, n = 4; 1 M, n = 3). Error is indicated by area fill within error bands. Growth parameters of lag phase (c), doubling time (Td) (d) and final OD600 at 48 h (e) extrapolated from (b) are presented. Box plots represent the median as well as the 25% and 75% interquartile ranges. The whiskers represent 1.5× the interquartile ranges. Plus sign (+) indicate the mean and the middle line indicate the median. Welch’s ANOVA with Games-Howell’s multiple comparison test was used in (c) W (3.000, 5.965) = 218.6, p < 0.0001) and (e) W (7.000, 9.736) = 7919, p < 0.0001). Statistics in (d) correspond to one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (F (5, 18) = 14.79, p < 0.0001). (f, g) Time series of ammonia molarity and cell viability (CFU/mL) during the lag phase and early growth of cultures grown in 0.1 (f) and 0.25 M ammonia (g). The relevance to data points in Fig. 2b is indicated. Ammonia molarity is plotted as a line graph with blue diamond markers on the left axis. Molarity at 0.05 M is indicated by a dotted line. Cell viability is plotted as a column bar graph on the right axis. Line and column heights represent mean ± s.d. (n = 3). For cell viability, statistical difference between means is given by unpaired t-test. ns, no significance; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001.
Figure 2b shows the growth dynamics of H. meridiana Slthf1 over 48 h in increasing concentrations of ammonia in an open-air system. Lag phase duration, doubling time (Td) and final OD600 are presented in Fig. 2c-e, respectively, extrapolated from Fig. 2b of the open-air system. At concentrations exceeding 0.01 M ammonia, lag phase was greater with higher ammonia concentrations; incubation in 0.1 M and 0.25 M ammonia prolongs lag phase time by 6-fold and 25-fold compared to the positive control, respectively (Fig. 2c). The lag phase time in 0.1 M ammonia was higher than that in 0.05 M ammonia (p < 0.05). Likewise, the lag phase time in 0.25 M ammonia was higher than that in 0.1 M ammonia (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 2c). Td was also higher with increasing ammonia concentration, with higher Td compared to the positive control observed in 0.05 M (p < 0.05), 0.1 M (p ≤ 0.0001) and 0.25 M (p < 0.0001) solutions (Fig. 2d). The Td was not significantly altered between positive control and 0.01 M (p = 0.965) or 0.1 M and 0.25 M solutions (p = 0.9972). Final OD600 after 48 h growth showed no statistical difference from positive control in 0.01 M (p = 0.932), 0.025 M (p = 0.330), 0.1 M (p = 0.248) and 0.25 M solutions (p = 0.135), but higher OD600 values were observed in 0.05 M compared to the positive control (p < 0.01) (Fig. 2e). Cell density was lower in 0.5 and 1 M solutions compared to the positive control (0.5 M, p < 0.01; 1 M, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2e), where no distinguishable growth occurred within 48 h (Fig. 2b).
In Fig. 2b, ammonia appeared to extend lag phase in 0.1 M and 0.25 M ammonia cultures. Onset of the log phase following extended lag phase could indicate an inhibitory, bacteriostatic influence of ammonia that had diminished over time possibly due to NH3 volatilization and dispersal from the culture solution. However, as the optical density at the lag phase (< 0.05) was below the detectable limit, it is possible cell death events occurring during this period were not adequately represented in the data. Thus, a bactericidal effect whereby cell numbers were reduced and gradually repopulated to numbers that were detectable by optical density could not be ruled out. To deconvolute bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects of ammonia, cell viability within lag phase and early log phase relevant time points were performed in 0.1 M and 0.25 M ammonia culture solutions. Relevant time points align to 0, 4 and 8 h for 0.1 M ammonia solutions, and 0, 4, 8, and 16 h for 0.25 M ammonia solutions. Additionally, ammonia concentrations were measured over these time points to identify whether NH3 volatilization and dispersal correlated with growth initiation. The results for 0.1 M and 0.25 M cultures are presented in Fig. 2f and 2g, respectively. After 4 h exposure, viable cells in 0.1 M ammonia showed a 1000-fold decrease from 0 h (t = 28.28, df = 4, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 2f). In 0.25 M ammonia, viable cells at 4 h were reduced 10-fold from 0 h (t = 6.499, df = 4, p < 0.01) (Fig. 2g). Bactericidal reduction to cell populations within 0.1 M ammonia solutions cease between 4 h and 8 h, where a small but non-significant increase in cell viability was observed t = 2.421, df = 4, p = 0.0727) (Fig. 2f). Likewise, bactericidal effects were absent between 4 h and 8 h in 0.25 M ammonia solutions where cell numbers stabilised (t = 0.8934, df = 4, p = 0.442) and increased from 8 h to 16 h (t = 11.76, df = 4, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2g). The increase in cell viability within 0.1 and 0.25 M ammonia solutions at 8 h and 16 h, respectively, aligned with diminished ammonia levels to ≤ 0.05 M at 4 h and 13 h, respectively (Fig. 2f, g). Thus, lag phase extension in the open-air system reflects two events: (1) an immediate bactericidal effect and (2) growth initiation after ammonia levels drop to sub-bactericidal levels (≤ 0.05 M) in surviving populations.
Ammonia toxicity is independent from pH toxicity
Ammonia is a weak base that raises solution pH with increasing concentration. To delimitate ammonia toxicity from pH toxicity, growth experiments were repeated in NaOH solutions pH-matched to ammonia solutions. Figure 3a presents the final CFU/mL of H. meridiana in pH-matched solutions following 72 h closed-air system incubation. No significant differences were observed between cells grown in positive control and pH-matched solutions up to pH 10.78 (equivalent to 1 M ammonia), with exception of cells grown in pH 10.18 where cell number was higher (p < 0.05). The outcome of the statistical analyses are available to view in Supplementary Table 2. Figure 3b presents the growth curve of H. meridiana grown under pH-matched NaOH solutions in an open-air system, with extrapolated parameters of lag phase (Fig. 3c), Td (Fig. 3d) and final OD600 (Fig. 3e) presented in Log2 fold changes (Log2FC) from growth in ammonia solutions of the same pH. For cells grown in pH 8.05 and 0.01 M ammonia, there was a non-significant difference between lag phase duration (U = 8, p > 0.999), Td (t = 1.55, df = 6, p = 0.171), and final OD600 (t = 0.798, df = 6, p = 0.456). But, significantly altered lag phases, Td and final OD600 were observed for higher pH and ammonia values. Lower lag phases were observed in cells grown in pH 8.96, pH 9.38, pH 9.73 and pH 10.18 compared to those grown at 0.025 M (t = 4.399, df = 3, p < 0.05), 0.05 M (t = 11.26, df = 3, p < 0.01), 0.1 M (t = 7.663, df = 3.02, p < 0.01) and 0.25 M ammonia (t = 29.05, df = 3.05, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 3c). Td was significantly lower for cells grown in pH 8.96 (t = 2.453, df = 6, p < 0.05), pH 9.38 (t = 4.235, df = 6, p < 0.01), pH 9.73 (U = 0, p < 0.05), and pH 10.18 (t = 2.532, df = 6, p < 0.05) compared to ammonia counterparts (Fig. 3d). Final OD600 at 48 h was lower in NaOH pH 8.96 (t = 4.577, df = 3, p < 0.05), pH 9.38 (t = 7.914, df = 6, p < 0.001), pH 9.73 (t = 2.786, df = 6, p < 0.05) and pH 10.18 (t = 5.173, df = 6, p < 0.01) than to growth in ammonia counterparts. Higher OD600 was observed in pH 10.49 (t = 16.09, df = 3.01, p < 0.001) and pH 10.78 solutions (t = 15.59, df = 3.12, p < 0.001) compared to ammonia counterparts (Fig. 3e), indicating lag phase extension and absent growth in 0.5 and 1 M ammonia could not be attributed to pH increases.
Growth of H. meridiana in NaOH pH-matched solutions. (a) CFU/mL of H. meridiana grown in a closed system for 72 h with solutions of increasing pH that pH-match ammonia solutions of 0 (PC, pH 6.06), 0.01 (pH 8.05), 0.025 (pH 8.96), 0.05 (pH 9.38), 0.1 (pH 9.73), 0.25 (pH 10.18). 0.5 (pH 10.49) and 1 M (pH 10.78). The positive control (PC) corresponds to growth in unamended yeast media (0 M ammonia) without pH modifications. Column heights and error bars represent mean ± s.d. (n = 3). Statistical significance is by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (F (7, 16) = 5.292, p < 0.01). (b) Growth curve of H. meridiana over 48 h grown in NaOH solutions of increasing pH. Growth curves represent mean OD600 values over time ± s.d. (n = 4). Error is indicated by area fill within error bands. Growth parameters of lag phase (c), doubling time (Td) (d) and final OD600 at 48 h (e) extrapolated from (b) are presented as Log2 fold change (FC) values comparing pH/ammonia. Statistics correspond to unpaired two-tailed t-tests and non-parametric tests comparing the data for lag phase, Td and final OD600 at each pH condition to the corresponding ammonia molarity. Statistical tests are detailed in Supplementary Table 3. Column heights and error bars represent mean ± s.d. (n = 4). (f) Box plots comparing the lag phase of H. meridiana grown in different pH-matched solutions at pH 10.18. Box plots represent the median as well as the 25% and 75% interquartile ranges. The whiskers represent 1.5× the interquartile ranges. The plus signs (+) indicate the mean and the central line indicate the median (n = 4). Welch’s ANOVA with Games-Howell’s multiple comparison test was used (W (5.000, 8.089) = 170.4). ns, no significance; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001.
To broaden the pH comparison beyond NaOH, lag phase analysis was used to explore whether the prolonged lag phase in 0.25 M ammonia (Fig. 2c) could be replicated in KOH, Na2SiO3, K2CO3, and Na2CO3 at pH 10.18 (Fig. 3f). No differences in lag phase duration were observed between H. meridiana grown in Na2SiO3 (p = 0.779) or Na2CO3 (p = 0.996) compared to NaOH. Longer lag phases were seen in KOH (p < 0.05) and K2CO3 (p < 0.0001) compared to NaOH, possibly reflecting reduced adaptation to potassium in H. meridiana. All high pH cultures showed a significantly shorter lag phase than 0.25 M ammonia cultures (p < 0.001), confirming the pH-independent toxicity of ammonia.
Ammonia toxicity exerts distinct changes to bacterial morphology
Specific bactericidal effects of ammonia on cells can be observed in Fig. 4. Under control growth conditions (unaltered yeast media) (Fig. 4a-b), H. meridiana exhibited ribosome-rich cytoplasm, visible nucleoids and clear division of outer membrane, periplasm and inner membrane. Cells exhibited irregular, undulating outer membrane, an enlarged periplasmic space and PHA-like granules. Upon 2 h treatment of 1 M ammonia (Fig. 4c-d), cells showed intracellular aggregation and loss of ribosomes with some showing cytoplasmic loss and lysis. The periplasmic space volume decreased, and detachment of the inner membrane from the outer membrane was observed. Cells showed expansion of electrolucent cavities, possibly surrounding nucleoids. Condensed material within the electrolucent cavities exhibited splayed morphologies, possibly indicating disruption to DNA supercoiling. Cells exposed to a NaOH solutions pH-matched to 1 M ammonia (10.78 pH) also showed some cell lysis events (Fig. 4e-f). However, there were few morphological differences from cells grown in control media. Differences include uniform outer membrane, and fewer PHA-like granules.
TEM of H. meridiana. H. meridiana after 2 h treatment in control solutions (a, b), 1 M ammonia (c, d), and pH-matched yeast media (pH 10.78, e, f). Yellow arrows: 1, outer membrane; 2, periplasmic space; 3, inner membrane; 4, nucleoid; 5, PHA-like granule; 6, lysed cell; 7, aggregated material; 8, electrolucent cavities.
Metabolic pathways altered in response to ammonia and high pH exposure
The survival of cells in up to 0.25 M ammonia in an open-air system suggests adaptations enabling tolerance to ammonia. Untargeted metabolomics was performed on H. meridiana in unamended yeast media (hereafter denoted ‘control’) and yeast media with 0.25 M ammonia at pH 10.18 (hereafter denoted ‘0.25 M ammonia’) to determine variations in metabolism that may account for the differences observed. To delimitate high pH adaptations from ammonia adaptations, metabolomics was also performed following exposure to yeast media adjusted to pH 10.18 with NaOH (hereafter denoted ‘NaOH pH 10.18’). Growth kinetics and sampling points in these conditions are indicated in Fig. 5a. Principal component analysis (PCA) (Fig. 5b) separated 0.25 M ammonia and NaOH pH 10.18 conditions from the control, with overlap between 0.25 M ammonia and NaOH pH 10.18 conditions indicating metabolic similarity. Univariate volcano analysis identified 23 features significantly altered in 0.25 M ammonia/control (Fig. 5c), 10 features significantly altered in 0.25 M ammonia/NaOH pH 10.18 (Fig. 5d), and 28 features significantly altered in NaOH pH 10.18/control (Fig. 5e). The volcano analysis dataset for each comparison group is shown in Supplementary Tables 4–6.
The most significantly altered metabolites between these conditions were identified by ANOVA (Supplementary Table 7), depicted as a heatmap (Fig. 5f). Overall, high similarity was found between 0.25 M ammonia and NaOH pH 10.18 exposed samples; both conditions generally exhibited higher levels of unsaturated phospholipid and lower levels of linoleic acid and derivatives. Intermediates that feed glycerophospholipid biosynthesis, CMP-sialic acid (F = 2021.9, p < 0.0001) and glycerol-3-phosphate (F = 2022.2, p < 0.0001), were more abundant compared to the control. Amino acid pathway intermediates indole-3-ethanol (F = 2327.8, p < 0.0001), N, N-dimethylglycine (F = 30.626, p < 0.001) and N-acetylglutamate (F = 25.653, p < 0.01) were also altered compared to control. There were reduced levels of N-acetylserotonin (F = 18876, p < 0.0001) and N-acetyl-L-aspartic acid (F = 24.091, p < 0.01) that could suggest reactions with acetyl donors were less favourable at high pH in both conditions.
Metabolic features significantly altered upon ammonia and high pH exposure in H. meridiana. (a) Growth curve of samples cultured for metabolomics processing with each replicate shown. Dotted line at OD600 = 0.5 indicates harvest point. (b) Scores plot of a principal component analysis (PCA). (c–e) Volcano plots depicting metabolites with a fold change greater than 2 and a p-value lower than 0.05 (adjusted using FDR correction) for 0.25 M ammonia/control (c), 0.25 M ammonia/NaOH pH 10.18 (d) and NaOH pH 10.18/control (e). Relative levels of each metabolite are presented as red dots (high) or blue dots (low). (f) Heatmap of the top 25 metabolites most significantly altered between ammonia, pH and control treated samples. Significance was calculated by one-way ANOVA (alpha = 0.05, two-sided) with Tukey’s post-hoc test using Metaboanalyst 6.0. Significance level is indicated next to metabolites. The normalised relative abundance is presented in a gradient from dark blue (high) to yellow (low). All data compiled from three biological replicates (n = 3). The control corresponds to growth in unamended yeast media (0 M ammonia) without pH modifications. PCA, volcano plots and heatmap were generated using MetaboAnalyst 6.0 and amended for visual clarity in Inkscape. **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001.
Ammonia exposure elicits a unique metabolomic response
Despite general similarities between cells exposed to 0.25 M ammonia and NaOH pH 10.18, ANOVA indicated five metabolites significantly altered only in 0.25 M ammonia cultured H. meridiana. Box plots of these metabolites are presented in Fig. 6a-e. Samples exposed to 0.25 M ammonia showed significantly higher levels of unidentified metabolites, metabolite i at m/z = 215.084 (Fig. 6a) and metabolite ii at m/z = 157.0973 (Fig. 6b), compared to NaOH pH 10.18 exposed samples (metabolite i, p < 0.0001; metabolite ii, p < 0.0001) and control samples (metabolite i, F = 2112.3, p < 0.0001; metabolite ii, F = 4865.6, p < 0.0001). Library annotations matched metabolite i to nitrogen-containing heterocyclic compound atrazine (89.6% Q score) and metabolite ii to hydrocarbon 2,7-dimethylnaphthalene (96.5% Q score). Structures of atrazine and 2,7-dimethylnaphthalene are depicted in Fig. 6a and b, respectively. Multivariate analysis also revealed exposure to 0.25 M ammonia increased the relative abundance of pantothenate (F = 28.839, p < 0.001) (Fig. 6c), and amino acids D-allo-isoleucine (F = 28.686, p < 0.001) (Fig. 6d), and alanine (F = 25.391, p < 0.01) (Fig. 6e), compared to those in NaOH pH 10.18 and control conditions.
Metabolic response to ammonia exposure in H. meridiana. (a–e) Box plots of five significantly altered metabolites found in 0.25 M ammonia exposed H. meridiana (ammonia) compared to NaOH pH 10.18 (pH) and control samples (control). Results are taken from ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test (Supplementary Table 7). The upper limit, middle line and lower limit of the boxplots indicate the 25th, 50th (median) and 75th percentiles, respectively. Whiskers represent 1.5× the interquartile ranges. Mean is indicated by a black diamond. Coloured circles represent the values from all samples (n = 3 for each group). Box and whiskers were generated using MetaboAnalyst 6.0 and edited for visual clarity in Inkscape. Chemical structures were created using ChemDraw. **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001.
Discussion
The influence of ammonia on habitability, particularly to microbes, is underrepresented in scientific literature. Yet, the pollution of ammonia into the environment could shape the underlying microbial community structures and biodiversity of alkaline environments. The presence of ammonia within the subsurface ocean of Enceladus, predicted at an alkaline pH, may also shape the habitability expectations of this satellite. Although the presence of life beyond Earth is speculative, terrestrial organisms can be utilised to explore the boundaries of known life under similar conditions to assess potential for habitability. In this study, we utilise alkalitolerant and halophilic H. meridiana as an analogue organism to investigate the molar concentration thresholds for survival, and physiological changes, that might be present in aerobic bacteria within extreme NH3 environments.
The exposure of H. meridiana to increasing ammonia concentrations revealed that growth at 0.05 M ammonia, where the relative abundance of NH3 is 62%, sets a consistent habitability limit for H. meridiana regardless of whether in a closed-air or open-air system. The tolerance of microbes to ammonia varies and cannot be predicted by genus or species alone; strain-specific responses to stress have been well documented51,52,53,54,55,56. The molarity limit established in this study aligns with data for other bacteria, including B. subtilis strains T1, T2, T19, T22, T33, T39 42 and Enterobacter cloaecae HNR16, but is lower than the absolute limit for ammonia survival in literature which extends to above 0.716 M (NH4)2SO4 at pH 9, correlating to above 0.5 M NH3, survived by strains of B. pumilus and B. pasteurii42. Specific ammonia adaptations may support the survival of B. pasteurii in such concentrations43,44,45. The relative abundance of NH3 to NH4+ in these studies is below 40%. We define an NH3-rich solution as one where NH3 exceeds natural environmental concentrations for ammonia (> 6 ppm, assessed by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry57, and where the relative abundance of NH3 exceeds NH4+. Our results characterise a habitability limit of 0.05 M in an ammonia solution that can be considered NH3-rich by this definition (550 ppm, NH3/NH4+ = 62%), which has not been previously reported for an aerobic bacterium.
Independent ammonia and pH toxicity has been characterised in E. coli48, yet indistinguishable toxicity has been recorded with B. subtilis, Sporosarcina, Paenibacillus, Staphylococcus, Brevibacillus, Streptomyces, Pseudomonas and Arthrobacter9,48. Using an alkalitolerant organism, we establish ammonia toxicity is distinct from pH toxicity in H. meridiana and does not exert toxicity via oxygen displacement or water activity changes. However, the degree of similarly between the metabolomic profiles of cells exposed to 0.25 M ammonia and a pH-matched NaOH solution indicates H. meridiana primarily responds to ammonia using high pH adaptations. Unique physiological responses to ammonia in H. meridiana included the accumulation of two cyclic compounds, metabolite i and ii, the former of which bore amine functional groups. The presence of these compounds may be indicative of intracellular NH3-driven reactions58,59. The disruption of such structures to cellular components could be a mechanism of pH-independent toxicity. Indeed, H. meridiana treated with ammonia exhibited aggregation to intracellular components that would suggest significant disruption to cell contents. Reductions to free ammonia concentration coupled with formation of metabolites i and ii could correlate the formation of metabolites i and ii with intracellular NH3-driven reactions.
Elevated levels of alanine, D-allo-isoleucine, and pantothenate were also exclusively observed in ammonia exposed H. meridiana. The presence of an isoleucine derivative and pantothenate suggested modulation to the Coenzyme A pathway that affects the cell membrane60,61, and amino acid metabolism61,62,63. Indeed, D-amino acids have been implicated in cell wall remodelling in Vibrio cholerae and B. subtilis64. Alanine dehydrogenase catalyses the production of alanine by a reaction between pyruvate and ammonium65,66,67. Thus, alanine could be a by-product of elevated ammonia levels. Notably, D-amino acid aminotransferase catalyses the production of pyruvate and D-glutamate from D-alanine and 2-oxoglutarate, for which D-allo-isoleucine can act as an amino donor in Thermotoga maritima68. The presence of D-allo-isoleucine may therefore lead to enrichment of pyruvate and, in turn, enrichment of D-alanine or L-alanine via the alanine dehydrogenase pathway, or both. D-alanine may act to impede ammonia permeation; D-alanine can increase rigidity, and decrease permeability, of the peptidoglycan layer69,70,71. L-alanine may act to prevent excessive ammonia metabolism; in some bacteria, L-alanine is an allosteric inhibitor of the nitrogen assimilation enzyme glutamine synthetase72,73,74.
Interpreted from the point of view of planetary habitability, the closed-air system is the most applicable representation of icy moon subsurface oceans as ammonia concentrations are presumed to remain constant. The ammonia toxicity limit at 0.05 M established in the closed-air system is higher than the lowest predicted concentration of ammonia at 0.01 M for the Enceladus ocean, but lower than the highest predicted concentration at 0.1 M25,30. With oceanic temperatures estimated at 0 ºC28 and salinity at 4% 29, the Enceladus ocean would require a pH of < 9.96 to satisfy a relative abundance of NH3 at < 62% suggested as a habitability boundary in this study, which is in range of current estimations29,30.
On Earth, up to 78 tetragrams of ammonia per annum are expelled globally from agricultural processes34,35. Individual livestock buildings show ammonia concentrations up to 30 ppm (0.002 M)75,76, which is lower than the habitability limit indicated in this study, yet, it should be noted a water volume of 1 L would require just 1 gram of ammonia to exceed an ammonia concentration of 0.05 M. In alkaline environments, this may alter bacterial community structures and biodiversity once the molarity and relative abundance of NH3 exceeds thresholds for survival, as has been observed in Mono Lake22. Bactericidal effects from NH3 may be transient, unless NH3 deposition is continuous, due to the open-air volatilization and dispersal of NH3 – repopulation of H. meridiana in an open-air ammonia system was observed at concentrations above 0.05 M ammonia. However, it is not without mention that localised and recurrent “point sources” of ammonia deposition have been identified in both agriculture and industrial processes that may consistently disturb bacterial habitats despite volatilization and dispersal77.
Without field-based environmental surveys, the effects of NH3 on terrestrial and extraterrestrial habitability are only estimated. Additionally, without isolation and biological characterisation of metabolites i and ii, we can only speculate the contribution of these molecules in ammonia toxicity. However, we have shown that bacterial growth and viability may become impacted when molar concentrations of ammonia are above 0.05 M, where NH3 exceeds NH4+. Moreover, we deduce that ammonia and pH toxicity are distinct, suggesting a need to modify the current understanding of NH3 toxicity in bacteria. Together, these findings can be integrated into the current knowledge regarding the impact of ammonia on terrestrial geomicrobiology and may inform future habitability assessments of NH3-rich extraterrestrial environments.
Materials and methods
Solution Preparation
Solutions of liquid ammonia were made to the required molar concentrations—0.01, 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1 M ammonia—in yeast media using 35% NH3 (Fisher Scientific, CAS Number: 1336-21-6). The pH of the solutions was determined with a Jenway 3510 benchtop pH meter. pH-matched sodium hydroxide solutions (NaOH; Fisher Scientific, CAS Number: 1310-73-2) were prepared by gradual addition of 1 M NaOH into yeast media. To compare growth in different basic solutions at a pH equivalent to that of 0.25 M ammonia (pH 10.18), several bases were selected that have a natural pH at or greater than pH 10.18 and high solubility in water. Thus, yeast media was made to pH 10.18 ± 0.01 using gradual addition of 1 M NaOH, 1 M potassium hydroxide (KOH), 1 M sodium metasilicate (Na2SiO3), 1 M potassium carbonate (K2CO3) or 1 M sodium carbonate (Na2CO3). Growth experiments proceeded as outlined below. pH was matched to within ± 0.01 pH units. All solutions were filter-sterilised through a 0.22-micron pore before use.
NH3/NH4 + percentage abundance
The percentage concentration of ammonia was determined by indirect calculation based on commonly utilised equations developed by Hampson19. Firstly, the ionic strength of the prepared solutions based on known salinity (0.2 M NaCl) was determined by Eq. 1.
Where I = molar ionic strength; S = salinity (parts per thousand, ppt).
The stoichiometric acid hydrolysis constant of ammonium ions, pKas, based on I, was then calculated. pKas values for given ionic strengths were provided by Hampson19. These values were plotted to obtain a linear regression for calculating pKa (Supplementary Fig. 1). pKas was calculated from Eq. 2.
Percentage abundance of NH3 at given salinity, pH and temperature was then calculated from Eq. 3. As salinity, temperature, pressure and pKas are constant in the experiment, only pH was modified to give percentage abundance of NH3 at each pH value (Supplementary Table 8).
Where P = 1 atm pressure; T = temperature (K).
Oxygen measurements
Oxygen concentrations (µmol/L) of unamended yeast media, ammonia solutions and pH-matched solutions, prepared as described above, were recorded using an oxygen microsenser with tip diameter of < 2 mm (OX-500, Unisense, Denmark). Solutions were equilibrated for 0.5 h before reading at 28 ºC in 96-well plates sealed with aluminium foil to prevent gas loss.
Water activity
Unamended yeast media, ammonia solutions and pH-matched solutions were prepared as described above. Solutions were equilibrated for 1.5 h and water activities measured at 28 ºC with a Rotronic HP23-AW water activity meter (Rotoronic AG, Bassersdorf, Switzerland).
Bacterial strain selection
Halomonas meridiana Slthf1 (DSM 15724; Gram negative) was obtained from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ). The organism was originally isolated at a depth of 2000 m from low temperature hydrothermal fluid in the East Pacific Rise. The strain exhibits halophilic growth up to 22% NaCl, and shows tolerance up to pH 12 50. The strain is therefore representative of the physiological attributes that could be necessary to grow in saline, alkaline fluids. A complete genome sequence is available for this strain49. This organism is not known to have specific adaptations to ammonia; this was a deliberate choice. The purpose of this study was not to study microbial biochemical adaptation to high ammonia, but rather to study whether NH3 can act as an abiotic factor influencing bacterial growth, survival and physiology.
Bacterial culture
An aerobic culture of H. meridiana was grown in glass conical Erlenmeyer flasks at 28 ºC in an orbital benchtop shaking incubator set to rotate at 150 RPM. We assume ammonia-rich environments present optimal nutrient conditions (i.e., available organic debris) with a salinity < 2% for the purpose of this study. Thus, H. meridiana Slthf1 was grown in a yeast media consisting of 1 g/100 mL Bacto™ yeast extract (Becton, Dickinson and Company), 0.2 M NaCl (1.17% salinity) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, CAS Number: 7647-14-5) and deionised water (dH2O).
Growth experiments
Two growth systems were implemented: ‘closed’ growth experiments were conducted in sealed air-tight 15 mL falcon tubes with sufficient headspace (14 mL) to allow aerobic metabolism but prevent ammonia evaporation; ‘open-air’ growth experiments were conducted in 96-well plates to permit ammonia evaporation and to monitor growth dynamics. Growth in closed-air system experiments were assessed by colony forming units (CFU) after 72 h incubation at 28 ºC and 150 RPM. Growth in open-air systems were assessed in 96-well plates by optical density (OD) readings in a BMG SPECTROstar Nano Microplate Reader at 600 nm with reading taken every half an hour for 48 h at 28 ºC. Plates were shaken at 200 RPM before each reading. Plate wells were prepared with 190 µL of a selected solution and seeded with 10 µL overnight H. meridiana culture to OD600 = 0.05. Positive control wells were 190 µL unamended yeast media inoculated with 10 µL overnight H. meridiana culture to OD600 = 0.05. Negative controls had no inoculation. To avoid condensation, plate lids were coated with Triton X-100 (0.05%) in 20% ethanol.
Growth parameters
Experiments were conducted to yield three standard microbiological growth parameters: lag phase duration, doubling time (Td), and final OD600. The lag phase was calculated with a web-based microbial lag phase calculator78, with the following parameters: algorithm = parameter fitting to a model; pre-processing applied: cut data at some time = yes, max time = 24–48 h; smooth data = no; initial biomass = first observation; model to fit = logistic; NLS fitting algorithm = auto; max number of iterations = 1000. Td was calculated by first determining the growth rate in the exponential growth phase (µ) as per Eq. 4, followed by calculation of Td as per Eq. 5.
Where N0 = OD600 at the beginning of a selected time interval (t0) in the exponential growth phase; N = OD600 at the end of a selected time interval (t) in the exponential growth phase. t and t0 are recorded in minutes.
The final OD600 reached after 48 h was recorded and used to represent the final cell concentration reached. Cell viability versus OD600 over 24 h was assessed by PrestoBlue™ cell viability reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA). Calibration curves confirm changes to observed OD600 corresponds to increasing number of viable cells (Supplementary Fig. 2). Growth or lack of growth was determined by the presence or absence of a defined lag phase, exponential phase, and stationary phase within a 48 h growth period.
Ammonia evaporation and cell viability
In separate 96-well plates, overnight culture of H. meridiana was inoculated to OD600 = 0.05 in 0.1 M and 0.25 ammonia solutions. Plates were incubated at 28 ºC on an orbital shaker continuously shaken at 150 RPM and tested as described below at 0, 4, and 8 h for 0.1 M ammonia solutions, and 0, 4, 8, and 16 h for 0.25 M ammonia solutions. Separate 96-well plates were used for each time point. The viability of cells in the culture wells at these time points was assessed by CFU on yeast media agar plates incubated at 28 ºC. Ammonia content of culture wells at these time intervals was recorded using the CHEMetrics High Range VACUette Ammonia test kit (K-1510 C) by direct nesslerization. The parts per million (ppm) of ammonia in the sample was determined by colorimetric analysis of the Nessler reaction product at 420 nm79. Molarity (M) of ammonia was calculated by conversion of ppm to molarity using the molar mass of ammonia (Eq. 6)
Transmission electron microscopy
An overnight culture of H. meridiana was pelleted, resuspended and exposed for 2 h to the following solutions: unamended yeast media (control), 1 M ammonia and a pH-matched solution (pH 10.78). The matched pH solution was created by gradual addition of 1 M NaOH to yeast media. Following incubation, cells were washed and resuspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Samples were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M Sodium Cacodylate buffer, pH 7.3, for 2 h then washed in three 10-minute changes of 0.1 M Sodium Cacodylate. Specimens were then post-fixed in 1% Osmium Tetroxide in 0.1 M Sodium Cacodylate for 45 min, then washed in three 10-minute changes of 0.1 M Sodium Cacodylate buffer. These samples were then dehydrated in 50%, 70%, 90% and 100% ethanol (X3) for 15 min each, then in two 10-minute changes in Propylene Oxide. Samples were then embedded in TAAB 812 resin. Sections, 1 μm thick were cut on a Leica Ultracut ultramicrotome, stained with Toluidine Blue, and viewed in a light microscope to select suitable areas for investigation. Ultrathin sections, 60 nm thick were cut from selected areas, stained in Uranyl Acetate and Lead Citrate then viewed in a JEOL JEM-1400 Plus TEM. Representative images were collected on a GATAN OneView camera at 4 K resolution. Images were processed using ImageJ57.
Metabolomics sampling and extraction
An overnight culture of H. meridiana was inoculated to OD600 = 0.05 within 0.25 M ammonia, pH-matched yeast media (pH 10.18) or unamended yeast media (control) within a 24-well plate. The pH-matched solution was created by gradual addition of 1 M NaOH to yeast media. Growth occurred within plates at 28 ºC and was assessed by OD600 reading every half an hour using a BMG SPECTROstar Nano Microplate Reader. Samples were harvested during the log phase of growth at OD600 = 0.5. All the following procedures occurred at 4 °C. Samples were aliquoted into microcentrifuge tubes and quenched by rapid cooling through submersion in a dry ice/70% (v/v) ethanol bath after brief incubation on ice. During cooling, samples were mixed vigorously to prevent freezing. Cells were separated from spent medium by centrifugation at 1,000 g for 10 min and supernatant discarded. Metabolite extraction occurred by addition of ice-cold chloroform/methanol/water (1:3:1 ratio). Cell lysis was encouraged by sonication with ice for 5 min at 37 kHz within an ultrasonication bath (Elmasonic S 60 H). Extraction mixtures were mixed vigorously at 1,200 rpm on an orbital shaker for 1 h. Following mixing, samples were centrifuged at 13,000 g for 3 min. The supernatant, containing metabolites, was collected into sterile microcentrifuge tubes. A pooled quality control sample was generated by combining equal volumes of metabolites from each sample. All samples were stored at − 80 °C until analysis.
Untargeted metabolomics analysis
The untargeted metabolomics analysis was performed using liquid chromatography (LC) coupled to ion mobility (IM) quadrupole time-of-flight (qTOF) mass spectrometry (MS). The instrumentation consisted of an Agilent 1290 Infinity II series UHPLC system hyphenated with an Agilent 6560 IM-qTOF with a Dual Agilent Jet Stream Electron Ionization source. LC separation was performed on an InfinityLab Poroshell 120 HILIC-Z, 2.1 mm × 50 mm, 2.7 μm UHPLC column (Agilent Technologies 689775–924) coupled to an InfinityLab Poroshell 120 HILIC-Z, 3.0 mm × 2.7 μm UHPLC guard column (Agilent Technologies 823750–948). A 3.5 min gradient was run using organic buffer (acetonitrile) combined with an aqueous buffer with low pH (10 mM ammonium formate, pH 3) or high pH (10 mM ammonium acetate, pH 9) for positive and negative ionization modes, respectively. Data was acquired using MassHunter Data Acquisition 10.0 software on 1 µL of sample separated on the column with a flow rate of 800 µL/min. The quality control sample was injected five times at the beginning of the experiment to condition the column and after every five test samples to monitor the instrument state throughout data acquisition. Data were acquired in the 50 to 1700 m/z range, with an MS acquisition rate of 0.8 scans/s. The metabolomics analyses were carried out by the EdinOmics research facility (RRID: SCR_021838) at the University of Edinburgh.
Metabolomics data processing and statistical analysis
The raw data files were processed using the Agilent MassHunter software suite. Briefly, ion multiplexed data files and calibration files were demultiplexed using the PNNL PreProcessor v2020.03.23 (the default settings for demultiplexing, moving average smoothing, saturation repair and spike removal were applied to the data). The data files were recalibrated for accurate mass and drift time using the AgtTofReprocessUi and the IM-MS Browser 10.0, respectively. Molecular features were extracted in Mass Profiler 10.0 with a retention time tolerance of ± 0.3 min, drift time tolerance of ± 1.5% and accurate mass tolerance of ± (5 ppm + 2 mDa). Features were annotated based on accurate mass and collision cross section (CCS) values using McLean CCS Compendium PCDL library80. Multivariate and univariate statistical analysis was performed using the MetaboAnalyst 6.0 web-based platform81. The input data were log-transformed and Pareto-scaled. The results were visualised using principal component analysis (PCA), box and whisker plots, volcano plots and heatmaps. Further aesthetic adjustments, including font changes and line thickness modifications, were made using Inkscape (version 1.0.1). Chemical structures were drawn using ChemDraw (version 23.1.2) and exported in SVG format for inclusion in the figures. The raw data associated with this dataset is available to view in the Supplementary Dataset. This study focuses on metabolomic changes in ammonia, pH and control samples, but the broader metabolomics profiling also included samples exposed to (NH4)2SO4. For analysis, only ammonia, pH and control samples were included in this study. The metabolomics of (NH4)2SO4 exposed samples are to be addressed in a separate analysis.
Statistics and reproducibility
All data were compiled from a minimum of three different cultures inoculated on different days with new media (n = 3–4 biological replicates). The normality of data was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test. For comparison of two groups, unpaired two-tailed t-tests were used. The Mann Whitney U test was used for unpaired groups where the assumption of normality was violated. An unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction was applied for groups with unequal variance as assessed by an F test. For comparison of two or more groups, equal variance was assessed with the Brown-Forsythe test. Samples of equal variance were examined by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. For samples where variance was not equal, Welch’s ANOVA test with Games-Howell’s post-hoc test was used. Statistical tests are specified in figure legends. Significance was considered when p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 8.0.2 (GraphPad Software Inc.).
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article within the Supplementary Dataset, except when specified as part of the Supplementary Material.
References
Doherty, M. J. et al. Ammonia in the interstellar medium of a starbursting disc at z = 2.6. Mon not R Astron. Soc. Lett. 517, L60–L64 (2022).
Henderson-Sellers, A. & Schwartz, A. W. Chemical evolution and ammonia in the early Earth’s atmosphere. Nature 287, 526–528 (1980).
Woodman, J. H., Trafton, L. & Owen, T. The abundances of ammonia in the atmospheres of Jupiter, Saturn, and Titan. Icarus 32, 314–320 (1977).
Nagatani, H., Shimizu, M. & Valentine, R. C. The mechanism of ammonia assimilation in nitrogen fixing bacteria. Arch. Für Mikrobiol. 79, 164–175 (1971).
Burris, R. H. & Roberts, G. P. Biological nitrogen fixation. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 13, 317–335 (1993).
Stein, L. Y. & Klotz, M. G. The nitrogen cycle. Curr. Biol. 26, R94–R98 (2016).
Fowler, D. et al. The global nitrogen cycle in the twenty-first century. Philos. Trans. R Soc. B Biol. Sci. 368, 20130164 (2013).
Vines, H. M. & Wedding, R. T. Some effects of ammonia on plant metabolism and a possible mechanism for ammonia toxicity. Plant. Physiol. 35, 820–825 (1960).
Kelly, L. C., Cockell, C. S. & Summers, S. Diverse microbial species survive high ammonia concentrations. Int. J. Astrobiol. 11, 125–131 (2012).
Dasarathy, S. et al. Ammonia toxicity: From head to toe? Metab. Brain Dis. 32, 529–538 (2017).
Jurcă, A. D. et al. Clinical and genetic diversity of congenital hyperammonemia. Romanian J. Morphol. Embryol. Rev. Roum Morphol. Embryol. 59, 945–948 (2018).
Walter, A. & Gutknecht, J. Permeability of small nonelectrolytes through lipid bilayer membranes. J. Membr. Biol. 90, 207–217 (1986).
Brazier, B. W. Membrane transport of ammonia. Am. J. Food Nutr. 4, 135–137 (2016).
Ritchie, R. J. & Gibson, J. Permeability of ammonia and amines in Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Bacillus firmus. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 258, 332–341 (1987).
Ritchie, R. J. & Gibson, J. Permeability of ammonia, methylamine and ethylamine in the Cyanobacterium Synechococcus R-2 (Anacystis nidulans) PCC 7942. J. Membr. Biol. 95, 131–142 (1987).
Weng, X. et al. Biofilm formation during wastewater treatment: Motility and physiological response of aerobic denitrifying bacteria under ammonia stress based on surface plasmon resonance imaging. Bioresour Technol. 361, 127712 (2022).
Fischer, M. A. et al. Immediate effects of ammonia shock on transcription and composition of a biogas reactor Microbiome. Front. Microbiol. 10, 2064 (2019).
Wang, F. et al. Effects of ammonia on apoptosis and oxidative stress in bovine mammary epithelial cells. Mutagenesis 33, 291–299 (2018).
Hampson, B. L. Relationship between total ammonia and free ammonia in terrestrial and ocean waters. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 37, 117–122 (1977).
Whitfield, M. The hydrolysis of ammonium ions in sea water - a theoretical study. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U K. 54, 565–580 (1974).
Bower, C. E. & Bidwell, J. P. Ionization of ammonia in seawater: Effects of temperature, pH, and salinity. J. Fish. Res. Board. Can. 35, 1012–1016 (1978).
Humayoun, S. B., Bano, N. & Hollibaugh, J. T. Depth distribution of microbial diversity in mono lake, a meromictic soda lake in California. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 1030–1042 (2003).
Ward, B. B., Martino, D. P., Diaz, M. C. & Joye, S. B. Analysis of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria from hypersaline mono lake, California, on the basis of 16s rRNA sequences. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 2873–2881 (2000).
Waite, J. H. Jr et al. Liquid water on enceladus from observations of ammonia and 40Ar in the plume. Nature 460, 487–490 (2009).
Waite, J. H. et al. Cassini finds molecular hydrogen in the enceladus plume: Evidence for hydrothermal processes. Science 356, 155–159 (2017).
Hay, H. C. F. C. & Matsuyama, I. Nonlinear tidal dissipation in the subsurface oceans of enceladus and other icy satellites. Icarus 319, 68–85 (2019).
Roberts, J. H. & Nimmo, F. Tidal heating and the long-term stability of a subsurface ocean on enceladus. Icarus 194, 675–689 (2008).
Matson, D. L., Castillo-Rogez, J. C., Davies, A. G., Johnson, T. V. & Enceladus A hypothesis for bringing both heat and chemicals to the surface. Icarus 221, 53–62 (2012).
Hsu, H. W. et al. Ongoing hydrothermal activities within enceladus. Nature 519, 207–210 (2015).
Fifer, L. M., Catling, D. C. & Toner, J. D. Chemical fractionation modeling of plumes indicates a gas-rich, moderately alkaline enceladus ocean. Planet. Sci. J. 3, 191 (2022).
McKay, C. P., Porco, C. C., Altheide, T., Davis, W. L. & Kral, T. A. The possible origin and persistence of life on enceladus and detection of biomarkers in the plume. Astrobiology 8, 909–919 (2008).
Taubner, R. S. et al. Biological methane production under putative Enceladus-like conditions. Nat. Commun. 9, 748 (2018).
Taubner, R. S., Schleper, C., Firneis, M. G. & Rittmann, S. K.-M. R. Assessing the ecophysiology of methanogens in the context of recent Astrobiological and planetological studies. Life 5, 1652–1686 (2015).
Luo, Z. et al. Estimating global ammonia (NH3) emissions based on IASI observations from 2008 to 2018. Atmospheric Chem. Phys. 22, 10375–10388 (2022).
Yang, Y. et al. Improved global agricultural crop- and animal-specific ammonia emissions during 1961–2018. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 344, 108289 (2023).
Erisman, J. W. & Draaijers, G. P. J. Atmospheric Deposition: in Relation To Acidification and Eutrophicationvol. 63 (Elsevier, 1995).
Krupa, S. V. Effects of atmospheric ammonia (NH3) on terrestrial vegetation: a review. Environ. Pollut. 124, 179–221 (2003).
Duce, R. A. et al. The atmospheric input of trace species to the world ocean. Glob Biogeochem. Cycles. 5, 193–259 (1991).
Powlson, D. S. & Dawson, C. J. Use of ammonium sulphate as a sulphur fertilizer: implications for ammonia volatilization. Soil. Use Manag. 38, 622–634 (2022).
Wang, X. et al. Effect of Trichoderma viride biofertilizer on ammonia volatilization from an alkaline soil in Northern China. J. Environ. Sci. 66, 199–207 (2018).
Wang, X. et al. Ammonia volatilization, greenhouse gas emissions and Microbiological mechanisms following the application of nitrogen fertilizers in a saline-alkali paddy ecosystem. Geoderma 433, 116460 (2023).
Leejeerajumnean, A., Ames, J. M. & Owens, J. D. Effect of ammonia on the growth of Bacillus species and some other bacteria. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 30, 385–389 (2000).
Jahns, T. Ammonium/urea-dependent generation of a proton electrochemical potential and synthesis of ATP in Bacillus pasteurii. J. Bacteriol. 178, 403–409 (1996).
Wiley, W. R. & Stokes, J. L. Effect of pH and ammonium ions on the permeability of Bacillus pasteurii. J. Bacteriol. 86, 1152–1156 (1963).
Wiley, W. R. & Stokes, J. L. Requirement of an alkaline pH and ammonia for substrate oxidation by Bacillus pasteurii. J. Bacteriol. 84, 730–734 (1962).
Vejmelkova, D. et al. Analysis of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria dominating in lab-scale bioreactors with high ammonium bicarbonate loading. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 93, 401–410 (2012).
Hayatsu, M. et al. An acid-tolerant ammonia-oxidizing γ-proteobacterium from soil. ISME J. 11, 1130–1141 (2017).
Deal, P. H., Souza, K. A. & Mack, H. M. High pH, ammonia toxicity, and the search for life on the Jovian planets. Orig Life. 6, 561–573 (1975).
Takahashi, Y., Takahashi, H., Galipon, J. & Arakawa, K. Complete genome sequence of Halomonas meridiana strain Slthf1, isolated from a deep-sea thermal vent. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. https://doi.org/10.1128/MRA.00292-20 (2020).
Kaye, J. Z., Márquez, M. C., Ventosa, A. & Baross, J. A. Y. Halomonas neptunia sp. nov., Halomonas sulfidaeris sp. nov., Halomonas axialensis sp. nov. and Halomonas hydrothermalis sp. nov.: halophilic bacteria isolated from deep-sea hydrothermal-vent environments. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54, 499–511 (2004). (2004).
Baharoglu, Z. & Mazel, D. SOS, the formidable strategy of bacteria against aggressions. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 38, 1126–1145 (2014).
Boutte, C. C. & Crosson, S. Bacterial lifestyle shapes stringent response activation. Trends Microbiol. 21, 174–180 (2013).
Fernandez, L., Rosvall, M., Normark, J., Fällman, M. & Avican, K. Co-PATHOgenex web application for assessing complex stress responses in pathogenic bacteria. Microbiol. Spectr. 12, e02781–e02723 (2023).
Fuentes, D. E., Acuña, L. G. & Calderón, I. L. Stress response and virulence factors in bacterial pathogens relevant for Chilean aquaculture: current status and outlook of our knowledge. Biol. Res. 55, 21 (2022).
Langer, G., Nehrke, G., Probert, I., Ly, J. & Ziveri, P. Strain-specific responses of Emiliania huxleyi to changing seawater carbonate chemistry. Biogeosciences 6, 2637–2646 (2009).
Moreno-Galván, A., Romero-Perdomo, F. A., Estrada-Bonilla, G., Meneses, C. H. S. G. & Bonilla, R. R. Dry-caribbean Bacillus spp. Strains ameliorate drought stress in maize by a strain-specific antioxidant response modulation. Microorganisms 8, 823 (2020).
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Toxicological Profile for Ammonia (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 2004).
Liu, S. & Cheng, X. Insertion of ammonia into alkenes to build aromatic N-heterocycles. Nat. Commun. 13, 425 (2022).
Nielsen, A. T., Moore, D. W., Ogan, M. D. & Atkins, R. L. Structure and chemistry of the aldehyde ammonias. 3. Formaldehyde-ammonia reaction. 1,3,5-Hexahydrotriazine. J. Org. Chem. 44, 1678–1684 (1979).
Yao, J. & Rock, C. O. Exogenous fatty acid metabolism in bacteria. Biochimie 141, 30–39 (2017).
Leonardi, R., Zhang, Y. M., Rock, C. O., Jackowski, S. & Coenzyme, A. Back in action. Prog Lipid Res. 44, 125–153 (2005).
Shi, L. & Tu, B. P. Acetyl-CoA and the regulation of metabolism: mechanisms and consequences. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 33, 125 (2015).
Tomita, T. Structure, function, and regulation of enzymes involved in amino acid metabolism of bacteria and archaea. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 81, 2050–2061 (2017).
Lam, H. et al. D-amino acids govern stationary phase cell wall remodeling in bacteria. Science 325, 1552–1555 (2009).
Aharonowitz, Y. & Friedrich, C. G. Alanine dehydrogenase of the β-lactam antibiotic producer Streptomyces clavuligerus. Arch. Microbiol. 125, 137–142 (1980).
Li, Q. et al. Alanine synthesized by alanine dehydrogenase enables ammonium-tolerant nitrogen fixation in Paenibacillus sabinae T27. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 119, e2215855119 (2022).
Yoshida, A. & Freese, E. Enzymic properties of Alanine dehydrogenase of Bacillus subtilis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA - Nucleic Acids Protein Synth. 96, 248–262 (1965).
Miyamoto, T. et al. Identification of a novel d-amino acid aminotransferase involved in d-glutamate biosynthetic pathways in the hyperthermophile Thermotoga maritima. FEBS J. 289, 5933–5946 (2022).
Trivedi, R. R. et al. Mechanical genomic studies reveal the role of d-alanine metabolism in Pseudomonas aeruginosa cell stiffness. mBio 9, e01340–e01318 (2018).
Liu, D. et al. Knockout of the Alanine racemase gene in Aeromonas hydrophila HBNUAh01 results in cell wall damage and enhanced membrane permeability. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 362, fnv089 (2015).
Palumbo, E. et al. Knockout of the Alanine racemase gene in Lactobacillus plantarum results in septation defects and cell wall perforation. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 233, 131–138 (2004).
Stadtman, E. R. Regulation of glutamine synthetase activity. EcoSal Plus. 1 https://doi.org/10.1128/ecosalplus.3.6.1.6 (2004).
Hubbard, J. S. & Stadtman, E. R. Regulation of glutamine synthetase II. Patterns of feedback Inhibition in microorganisms. J. Bacteriol. 93, 1045–1055 (1967).
Liaw, S. H., Pan, C. & Eisenberg, D. Feedback Inhibition of fully unadenylylated glutamine synthetase from Salmonella typhimurium by Glycine, Alanine, and Serine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 90, 4996–5000 (1993).
Groot Koerkamp, P. W. G. et al. Concentrations and emissions of ammonia in livestock buildings in Northern Europe. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 1, 79–95 (1998).
Seedorf, J. & Hartung, J. Survey of ammonia concentrations in livestock buildings. J. Agric. Sci. 133, 433–437 (1999).
Van Damme, M. et al. Industrial and agricultural ammonia point sources exposed. Nature 564, 99–103 (2018).
Smug, B. J., Opalek, M., Necki, M. & Wloch-Salamon, D. Microbial lag calculator: A shiny-based application and an R package for calculating the duration of microbial lag phase. Methods Ecol. Evol. 15, 301–307 (2024).
Jeong, H., Park, J. & Kim, H. Determination of NH4+ in environmental water with interfering substances using the modified nessler method. J. Chem. e359217 (2013). (2013).
Nichols, C. M. et al. Untargeted molecular discovery in primary metabolism: collision cross section as a molecular descriptor in ion mobility-mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 90, 14484–14492 (2018).
Pang, Z. et al. MetaboAnalyst 6.0: towards a unified platform for metabolomics data processing, analysis and interpretation. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, W398–W406 (2024).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a Natural Environmental Research Council (NERC) Doctoral Training Partnership grant (NE/S007407/1). C.H. and C.S.C thanks the Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) for support under grant ST/V000586/1 and ST/Y001788/1. We also acknowledge the support of the Wellcome Trust Multiuser Equipment Grant (WT104915MA) for use of the JEOL JEM-1400 Plus TEM. We acknowledge the EdinOmics research facility at the University of Edinburgh where the metabolomics analyses were carried out.
Funding
for this research was provided by the Natural Environmental Research Council (NERC) though an E4 Doctoral Training Partnership (DTP) studentship (NE/S007407/1). C.H. and C.S.C thanks the Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) for support under grant ST/V000586/1 and ST/Y001788/1. We also acknowledge the support of the Wellcome Trust Multiuser Equipment Grant (WT104915MA) for use of the JEOL JEM-1400 Plus TEM. We acknowledge the EdinOmics research facility at the University of Edinburgh where the metabolomics analyses were carried out.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.M.H. conducted the experiments, data analysis and paper writing. C.S.C. and P.N. jointly supervised this work and provided input in the writing of the paper. C.S.C. provided instruments and materials for experiments.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hopton, C.M., Nienow, P. & Cockell, C.S. Ammonia sets limit to life and alters physiology independently of pH in Halomonas meridiana. Sci Rep 15, 19549 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03858-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03858-z
- Springer Nature Limited