Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to link.springer.com

Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Comparative Analysis of Variation of the BOLD Fragment of Mitochondrial cox1 Gene and Y Chromosome kl-2 1-beta dynein heavy chain Gene in Drosophilavirilis Species Group (Diptera: Drosophilidae)

  • ANIMAL GENETICS
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The species of the virilis group of Drosophila are one of the well-studied models of speciation and microevolution. A comparative analysis of variability of the marker genes for two non-recombining regions of the genome was conducted: the BOLD fragment of the mitochondrial cox1 gene and the fragment of the dynein gene in order to identify events of interspecific hybridization in 11 Drosophila species of the virilis group. We identified single events of the mitochondrial DNA transfer from Drosophila montana to Drosophila lacicola and of the Y chromosome transfer from Drosophila ezoana to Drosophila montana. The probable connection of the modern speciation process in Drosophila montana with genomic instability and interspecific hybridization in nature is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from £29.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

REFERENCES

  1. van der Linde, K. and Houle, D., A supertree analysis and literature review of the genus Drosophila and closely related genera (Diptera, Drosophilidae), Insect System. Evol., 2008, vol. 39, pp. 241—267. https://doi.org/10.1163/187631208788784237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tamura, K., Subramanian, S., and Kumar, S., Temporal patterns of fruit fly (Drosophila) evolution revealed by mutation clocks, Mol. Biol. Evol., 2004, vol. 21, pp. 36—44. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msg236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhutkar, A., Russo, S.M., Smith, T.F., and Gelbart, W.M., Genome-scale analysis of positionally relocated genes, Genome Res., 2007, vol. 17, pp. 1880—1887. doi https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.7062307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, B.C., Park, J., Watabe, H.A., et al., Molecular phylogeny of the Drosophila virilis section (Diptera: Drosophilidae) based on mitochondrial and nuclear sequences, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 2006, vol. 40, pp. 484—500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.03.026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Morales-Hojas, R., Reis, M., Vieira, C.P., and Vieira, J., Resolving the phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary history of the Drosophila virilis group using multilocus data, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 2011, vol. 60, pp. 249—258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2011.04.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Caletka, B. and McAllister, B., A genealogical view of chromosomal evolution and species delimitation in the Drosophila virilis species subgroup, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 2004, vol. 33, pp. 664—670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2004.08.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Koerich, L.B., Wang, X., Clark, A.G., and Carvalho, A.B., Low conservation of gene content in the Drosophila Y chromosome, Nature, 2008, vol. 456, pp. 949—951. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Carvalho, A.B. and Clark, A.G.Y., Y Chromosome of D. pseudoobscura is not homologous to the ancestral Drosophila Y, Science, 2005, vol. 307, pp. 108—110. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1101675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E.F., and Sambrook, J., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Lab., 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., et al., DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates, Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol., 1994, vol. 3, pp. 294—299.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar, S., Stecher, G., and Tamura, K., MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for bigger datasets, Mol. Biol. Evol., 2016, vol. 33, pp. 1870—1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Leigh, J.W. and Bryant, D., POPART: full-feature software for haplotype network construction, Methods Ecol. Evol., 2015, vol. 6, pp. 1110—1116. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Clement, M., Posada, D., and Crandall, K.A., TCS: A computer program to estimate gene genealogies, Mol. Ecol., 2000, vol. 9, pp. 1657—1659. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01020.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sokolov, N.N., A new species, Drosophila imeretensis, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1948, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1007—1008.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eldredge, N. and Gould, S., Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism, in Models in Paleobiology, Schopf, T.J.M., Ed., San Francisco: Freeman, 1972, pp. 82—115.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sverdlov, E.D., Retroviruses and primate evolution, BioEssays, 2000, vol. 22, pp. 161—171. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(200002)22:2<161::AID-BIES7>3.0.CO;2-X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Andrianov, B.V. and Romanov, D.A., Transpositions of site-specific retrotransposon Tv1 mark speciation events in Drosophila from the virilis group, in Aktual’nye problemy biologicheskoi i khimicheskoi ekologii (Current Issues in Biological and Chemical Ecology), 2016, pp. 89—93.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991, Moscow, Russia

    B. V. Andrianov, D. A. Romanov & T. V. Gorelova

  2. Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117334, Moscow, Russia

    S. Yu. Sorokina

Authors
  1. B. V. Andrianov
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. A. Romanov
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Yu. Sorokina
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T. V. Gorelova
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. V. Andrianov.

Additional information

Translated by A. Lisenkova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Andrianov, B.V., Romanov, D.A., Sorokina, S.Y. et al. Comparative Analysis of Variation of the BOLD Fragment of Mitochondrial cox1 Gene and Y Chromosome kl-2 1-beta dynein heavy chain Gene in Drosophilavirilis Species Group (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Russ J Genet 55, 592–597 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S102279541905003X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S102279541905003X

Keywords: