Abstract
This chapter highlights the challenges of ‘knowledge production’ in what is now known as the Global South. It analyzes how mighty global parameters shape the queries and practices in a given location, and thus limit the investigation long before a scholar starts her work. Authorship and agency are crucial areas of discussion in recent decades that pointed at many tendencies, as well as opened up many possibilities of knowledge production across the national borders. However, the interlocutors of these concepts often assumed texts and other expressions to be the testimony of their authors’ agency. Thus, agency was reduced to an act of creating (or co-creating) texts or (artistic) expressions, dissociating from the realm of meanings this production could be read within. However, authorship has not appeared to pose critical understanding of, or radical alternatives to, the system of meanings and the ways they are perceived in a certain historical structure. Without reconfiguring the concepts, categories, and premises, co-authorship or co-creation can only aid the cultural project of pluralism or ‘melting-pot’. It may end up as the feminist poet Jo Carrillo once wrote ‘Our white sisters/radical friends/love to own pictures of us’.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
I am well aware of the fact that this is a very risky area for discussion, and I do not claim any authority on mysticism or theology. There are experts more qualified. This is a general understanding or analysis of based on what I perceived. If incorrect, only I should be held accountable.
- 2.
On archiving, I recall a casual evening chat with a professor from the Netherlands. He was happily elaborating on how Dutch archives had sufficient documentation on Indonesia. My colleague from Bangladesh reminded him of the colonial relationship and purposes of archiving of colonial subjects. This presumably posed some discomfort and disruption, but we were all aware of the underpinning historical fact.
- 3.
A folklore researcher and founding faculty member of Bengali literature at the then Calcutta University in the latter part of the nineteenth century, Dr. Sen is credited with collecting ten ballads from the greater Mymensingh region between 1923 and 1932. In other sources, he is known for collecting 21 ballads in total from other parts of eastern Bengal. However, in the strictest sense of collection, the first ten ballads had already been collected by someone called Chandra Kumar Dey, a local lover of literature.
- 4.
Development literature in Bangladesh, namely, NGO reports, that authenticates development from the beneficiaries’ ‘own voice’, is being produced in large numbers. During this development hype, a handful of critical examinations also took place, mostly by foreign academics, that went beyond this formulaic representation of authentic ‘voice from the below’. Sarah White and Geoffrey Wood were among those very few development scholars (White 1992; Wood 1995).
- 5.
Master’s House (Kortar Shangshar in Bangla), edited by Saydia Gulrukh and Manosh Chowdhury, was the first-ever feminist anthology in Bangladesh published by a feminist readers’ circle, Rupantar, in 2000.
- 6.
Talal Asad argued that the act of translation is contextualizing and needs a greater understanding of the historical structure (Asad and Dixon 1985).
- 7.
I am not a great fan of disciplinary boundaries. In other words, I am aware of the incentives and administrative reasons that form a ‘new’ discipline in the defined guidelines of an academic institution. Often, they, contrary to what is told as ‘new knowledge’, are an outcome of professional competitiveness and management issues.
References
Asad, Talal, and John Dixon. 1985. Translating Europe’s Others. In Europe and Its Others, ed. F. Barker et al., vol. 1, 170–177. Colchester: University of Essex Press.
Chowdhury, Manosh. 1998. Nribigyan Aar Shottanushondhan Niye Bhabna/Anthropology and the Search for Truth. Shomaj Nirikkhon 68:1–11.
Clifford, James. 1986. Partial Truths. In Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, ed. James Clifford and George E. Marcus, 1–26. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Handler, Richard. 1986. Authenticity. Anthropology Today 2 (1): 2–4.
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1922. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: G. Routledge & Sons.
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1967. A Diary in the Strict Sense of the Term. San Diego: G. Harcourt, Brace & World.
Marcus, George E., and Michael M. J. Fischer. 1986. Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mazhar, Farhad. 2014. Banglar Bhabandolon/Philosophies of Bengal. Dhaka: Mowla Brothers.
Price, David. 2000. Anthropologists as Spies. The Nation, November 02.
Theodossopoulos, Dimitrios. 2013. Introduction: Laying Claim to Authenticity: Anthropological Dilemmas. Anthropological Quarterly 86 (2): 337–360.
To, W. M., and Billy T. W. Yu. 2020. Rise in Higher Education Researchers and Academic Publications. Emerald Open Research 2 (3). https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.13437.1
Vansina, Jan. 2017 [1965]. Oral Tradition: A Study in Historical Methodology. London: Routledge.
White, Sarah C. 1992. Arguing with the Crocodile: Gender and Class in Bangladesh. Dhaka: University Press Limited.
Wood, Geoffrey D. 1995. Bangladesh: Whose Ideas, Whose Interests? Dhaka: University Press Limited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chowdhury, M. (2025). On Knowledge Production in the Global South. In: Popular Culture and Political Lives. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-99074-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-99074-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-99073-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-99074-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)