Abstract
Six hundred and eighteen pupils, enrolled in elementary and junior-high-school classes (Pisa, Italy) were asked to solve a number of probability problems. The main aim of the investigation has been to obtain a better understanding of the origins and nature of some probabilistic intuitive obstacles. A linguistic factor has been identified: It appears that for many children, the concept of “certain events’ is more difficult to comprehend than that of “possible events”. It has been found that even adolescents have difficulties in detaching the mathematical structure from the practical embodiment of the stochastic situation. In problems where numbers intervene, the magnitude of the numbers considered has an effect on their probability: bigger numbers are more likely to be obtained than smaller ones. Many children seem to be unable to solve probability questions, because of their inability to consider the rational structure of a hazard situation: “chance” is, by itself, an equalizing factor of probabilities. Positive intuitive capacities have also been identified: some problems referring to compound events are better solved when addressed in a general form than when addressed in a particular way.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Feller, W.: 1960, Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications, Vol. 1, John Wiley, New York.
Fischbein, E.: 1975, The Intuitive Sources of Probabilistic Thinking in Children, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Fischbein, E., Barbat, I. and Minzat, I.: 1975, ‘Primary and secondary intuitions in the introduction of probability’, in Fischbein, E. (ed.), The Intuitive Sources of Probabilistic Thinking in Children, Appendix 1, pp. 139–155, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Fischbein, E. and Gazit, A.: 1984, ‘Does the teaching of probability improve probabilistic intuitions?’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 15(1), 1–24.
Garfield, J. and Ahlgren, A.: 1988, ‘Difficulties in learning basic concepts in probability and statistics: implications for research’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 19(1), 44–63.
Godino, J. D., Batanero, C. and Canizares, J.: 1987, Azar y Probabilidad, Sintezis, Madrid.
Hawkins, S. A. and Kapadia, R.: 1984, ‘Children's conceptions of probability — a psychological and pedagogical review’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 15(4), 349–377.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A. (eds.): 1982, Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Lecoutre, M. and Durand, J.: 1988, ‘Judgements probabilistes et modèles cognitifs: Etude d'une situation aleatoire’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 19(3), 357–368.
Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B.: 1951, La Genése de l'Idée de Hasard chez L'Enfant, PUF, Paris.
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.: 1973, ‘Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability’, Cognitive Psychology No. 5, 207–232.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fischbein, E., Nello, M.S. & Marino, M.S. Factors affecting probabilistic judgements in children and adolescents. Educ Stud Math 22, 523–549 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00312714
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00312714