Abstract
This paper considers research and development (R&D) as a style of investigation that holds promise for the field of behavior analysis. Contrasted with academic-style research, R&D tends to be highly targeted toward achievement of specific outcomes, which are determined by a user community. R&D is typically multidisciplinary in character and is coordinated by a funding source. R&D usually includes extensive field testing and systematically addresses technology transfer. A program of R&D focused on detector dogs serves as an exemplar of this approach for behavior analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailey, M., & Bailey, R. (1977). The uses of sensory systems and response capabilities in security systems. In Joel J. Kramer (Ed.), The role of behavioral science in physical security (pp. 123–144). Proceedings of the Second Annual Symposium, Center for Consumer Product Technology, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC.
Birnbrauer, J. S. (1979). Applied behavior analysis, service, and the acquisition of knowledge. The Behavior Analyst, 2, 15–21.
Breland, K., & Breland, M. (1951). A field of applied animal psychology. American Psychologist, 6, 202–204.
Deitz, S. M. (1982). Applied behavior analysis: An historical analogy. The Behavior Analyst, 5, 53–64.
Hayes, S. C, Rincover, A., & Solnick, J. V. (1980). The technical drift of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 275–285.
Herman, E. (1995). The romance of American psychology: Political culture in the age of experts. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Johnston, J. M. (1991). We need a new model of technology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 425–427.
Johnston, J. M. (1993). A model for developing and evaluating behavioral technology. In R. Van Houten & S. Axelrod (Eds.), Effective behavioral treatment: Issues and implementation (pp. 323–343). New York: Plenum.
Johnston, J. M. (1996). Distinguishing between applied research and practice. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 35–47.
Mace, F. C. (1991). Technological to a fault or faulty approach to technology development? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 433–435.
Mace, F. C. (1994). Basic research needed for stimulating the development of behavioral technologies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 29–55.
Michael, J. L. (1980). Flight from behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 25, 83–88.
Pennypacker, H. S. (1986). The challenge of technology transfer: Buying in without selling out. The Behavior Analyst, 9, 147–156.
Pierce, W D., & Epling, W F. (1985). What happened to analysis in applied behavior analysis? The Behavior Analyst, 3, 19.
Skinner, B. F. (1961). Cumulative record. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Technology against terrorism: The federal effort. (1991). (OTA–ISC–481). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Verhave, T. (1966). The pigeon as a quality control inspector. In R. Ulrich, T. Stachnik, & J. Mabry, J. (Eds.), Control of human behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 213–221). Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
I am grateful to Richard Foxx, Sigrid Glenn, and Hank Pennypacker for their comments on an earlier version of this paper. The research program described in the paper is largely the result of the considerable contributions of Paul Waggoner (now Director of the Canine Olfactory Detection Laboratory) and Marc Williams (previously Director of the Canine Field Research Facility). In addition, over the more than 10 years of this research program, many graduate and undergraduate students, as well as technical staff of the Institute for Biological Detection Systems, have contributed enormously to the success of the canine program. This research has been or is presently funded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the Federal Aviation Administration, the Office of National Drug Control Policy, and the Technical Support Working Group through the Office of Special Technology, among other organizations. I am particularly grateful to Susan F. Hallowell of the FAA and James A. Petrousky of the Office of Special Technology for their support.
An earlier version of this paper was delivered as the presidential address at the 23rd annual convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis. I have recently returned to regular teaching and other departmental duties and am no longer involved with the canine program.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnston, J.M. Behavior analysis and the R&D paradigm. BEHAV ANALYST 23, 141–148 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392007
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392007