Abstract
In this paper, we present a first survey of the literature regarding whether the strategy method, in which a responder makes conditional decisions for each possible information set, leads to different experimental results than does the more standard direct-response method, in which the responder learns the action of the first mover and then chooses a response. Of the twenty-nine existing comparisons, sixteen find no difference, while four do find differences, and nine comparisons find mixed evidence. We also find some indications about the underlying determinants of when the two methods lead to different responses. For example, it appears that levels of punishment are substantially lower with the strategy method. In addition, it also appears that difference across these elicitation methods are more likely when people make fewer contingent choices. Finally, in no case do we find that a treatment effect found with the strategy method is not observed with the direct-response method.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abbink, K., Irlenbusch, B., & Renner, E. (2000). An experimental study of reciprocity and retribution. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 42, 265–277.
Armentier, O. (2004). Do wealth differences affect fairness considerations? Université de Montréal, mimeo.
Armentier, O., & Treich, N. (2007). Subjective probabilities in games: an application to the overbidding puzzle. Université de Montréal, mimeo.
Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic.
Bardsley, N., Cubitt, R., Loomes, G., Moffatt, P., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2010). Experimental economics: rethinking the rules. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Blount, S., & Bazerman, M. (1996). The inconsistent evaluation of absolute versus comparative payoffs in labor supply and bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 30, 227–240.
Bosch-Domènech, A., & Silvestre, J. (1999). Does risk aversion or attraction depend on income? An experiment. Economics Letters, 65, 265–273.
Bosch-Domènech, A., & Silvestre, J. (2006). Risk aversion and embedding bias. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, mimeo.
Brandts, J., & Charness, G. (2000). Hot vs. cold: sequential responses in simple experimental games. Experimental Economics, 2, 227–238.
Brandts, J., & Charness, G. (2003). Truth or consequences: an experiment. Management Science, 49, 116–130.
Brandts, J., & Charness, G. (2009). The strategy versus the direct-response method: a survey of experimental comparisons. Working paper.
Brandts, J., Riedl, A., & van Winden, F. (2009). Competitive rivalry, social disposition and subjective well-being: an experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 93, 1158–1167.
Brosig, J., Weimann, J., & Yang, C.-L. (2003). The hot versus cold effect in a simple bargaining experiment. Experimental Economics, 6, 75–90.
Büchner, S., Coricelli, G., & Greiner, B. (2007). Self-centered and other-regarding behavior in the solidarity game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 62, 293–303.
Burks, S., Carpenter, J., & Verhoogen, E. (2003). Playing both roles in the trust game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 51, 195–216.
Casari, M., & Cason, T. (2009). The strategy method lowers measured trustworthy behavior. Economics Letters, 103, 157–159.
Cason, T., & Mui, V.-L. (1998). Social influence in the sequential dictator game. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 42, 248–265.
Carter, J., & Irons, M. (1991). Are economists different, and if so, why? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 171–177.
Charness, G., & Grosskopf, B. (2001). Relative payoffs and happiness: an experimental study. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 45, 301–328.
Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002). Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 817–868.
Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2005). Expressed preferences and behavior in experimental games. Games and Economic Behavior, 53, 151–169.
Cooper, D., & Van Huyck, J. (2003). Evidence on the equivalence of the strategic and extensive form representation of games. Journal of Economic Theory, 110, 290–308.
Cox, J., & Hall, D. (2010). Trust with private and common property: effects of stronger property right entitlements. Games, 1, 527–550.
Engelmann, D., & Strobel, M. (2004). Inequality aversion, efficiency and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments. American Economic Review, 94, 857–869.
Falk, A., & Kosfeld, M. (2006). The hidden costs of control. American Economic Review, 96, 1611–1630.
Falk, A., Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2005). Driving forces behind informal sanctions. Econometrica, 73, 2017–2030.
Falk, A., Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2008). Testing theories of fairness—intentions matter. Games and Economic Behavior, 62, 287–303.
Fischbacher, U., & Gächter, S. (2006). Heterogeneous social preferences and the dynamics of free riding in public goods. CeDEx Discussion Paper No. 2006-01.
Fong, Y.-f., Huang, C.-Y., & Offerman, T. (2007). Guilt-driven reciprocity in a psychological signaling game. University of Amsterdam, mimeo.
Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J., Savin, N., & Sefton, M. (1994). Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6, 347–369.
Goeree, J., Holt, C., & Palfrey, T. (2002). Quantal response equilibrium and overbidding in private-value auctions. Journal of Economic Theory, 104, 247–272.
Güth, W., & Tietz, R. (1990). Ultimatum bargaining behavior: a survey and comparison of experimental results. Journal of Economic Psychology, 11, 417–449.
Güth, W., Ockenfels, P., & Wendel, M. (1997). Cooperation based on trust: an experimental investigation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, 15–43.
Güth, W., Huck, S., & Müller, W. (2001). The relevance of equal splits in ultimatum games. Games and Economic Behavior, 37, 161–169.
Harless, D., & Camerer, C. (1994). The predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories. Econometrica, 62, 1251–1289.
Hommes, C., Sonnemans, J., Tuinstra, J., & van de Velden, H. (2005). A strategy experiment in dynamic asset pricing. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 29, 823–843.
Iriberri, N., & Rey-Biel, P. (2008). The role of role uncertainty in modified dictator games. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, mimeo.
Keser, C. (1993). Some results of experimental duopoly markets with demand inertia. Journal of Industrial Economics, 41, 133–151.
Krawczyk, M. (2006). Note on strategy method in experimental games. University of Amsterdam, mimeo.
Kübler, D., & Müller, W. (2002). Simultaneous and sequential price competition in heterogeneous duopoly markets: experimental evidence. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20, 1437–1460.
Meidinger, C., Robin, S., & Ruffieux, B. (1999). Jeu de l’investissement et coordination par les intentions: des résultats expérimentaux. Université Pierre Mendès France, Grenoble, mimeo.
Mitzkewitz, M., & Nagel, R. (1993). Experimental results on ultimatum games with incomplete information. International Journal of Game Theory, 22, 171–198.
Muller, L., Sefton, M., Steinberg, R., & Vesterlund, L. (2008). Strategic behavior and learning in repeated voluntary contribution experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 67, 782–793.
Murphy, R., Rapoport, A., & Parco, J. (2006). Breakdown of cooperation in iterative real-time trust dilemmas. Experimental Economics, 9, 147–166.
Murphy, R., Rapoport, A., & Parco, J. (2007). Credible signaling in real-time trust dilemmas. University of Arizona, mimeo.
Offerman, T., Potters, J., & Verbon, H. (2001). Cooperation in an overlapping generations experiment. Games and Economic Behavior, 36, 264–275.
Oosterbeek, H., Sloof, R., & van de Kuilen, G. (2004). Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: evidence from a meta-analysis. Experimental Economics, 7, 171–188.
Oxoby, R., & McLeish, K. (2004). Sequential decision and strategy method vectors in ultimatum bargaining: evidence on the strength of other-regarding behavior. Economics Letters, 84, 399–405.
Rapoport, A. (1997). Order of play in strategically equivalent games in extensive form. International Journal of Game Theory, 26, 113–136.
Rapoport, A., & Fuller, M. (1995). Bidding strategies in a bilateral monopoly with two-sided incomplete information. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 179–196.
Rapoport, A., & Sundali, J. (1996). Ultimatums in two-person bargaining with one-sided uncertainty: offer games. International Journal of Game Theory, 25, 475–494.
Rapoport, A., Sundali, J., & Seale, D. (1996). Ultimatums in two-person bargaining with one-sided uncertainty: demand games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 30, 173–196.
Rapoport, A., Seale, D., Erev, I., & Sundali, J. (1998). Equilibrium play in large group market entry games. Management Science, 40, 119–141.
Reuben, E., & Suetens, S. (2008). Disentangling strategic from non-strategic cooperation in social dilemmas. Mimeo.
Roth, A. (1995). Bargaining experiments. In J. Kagel & A. Roth (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Schotter, A., Weigelt, K., & Wilson, C. (1994). A laboratory investigation of multiperson rationality and presentation effects. Games and Economic Behavior, 6, 445–468.
Seale, D., & Rapoport, A. (2000). Elicitation of strategy profiles in large group coordination games. Experimental Economics, 3, 153–179.
Selten, R. (1967). Die Strategiemethode zur Erforschung des eingeschränkt rationalen Verhaltens im Rahmen eines Oligopolexperiments. In H. Sauermann (Ed.), Beiträge zur experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung (pp. 136–168). Tübingen: Mohr.
Selten, R., & Ockenfels, A. (1998). An experimental solidarity game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 34, 517–539.
Selten, R., Mitzkewitz, M., & Uhlich, G. (1997). Duopoly strategies programmed by experienced players. Econometrica, 65, 517–555.
Selten, R., Abbink, K., Buchta, J., & Sadrieh, K. (2003). How to play 3×3-games—a strategy method experiment. Games and Economic Behavior, 45, 19–37.
Snijders, C., & Keren, G. (1999). Determinants of trust. In D. Budescu, I. Erev, & R. Zwick (Eds.), Games and human behavior (pp. 355–385). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Solnick, S. (2007). Cash and alternate methods of accounting in an experimental game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 62, 316–321.
Sonnemans, J. (2000). Decisions and strategies in a sequential search experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 21, 91–102.
Sundali, J., Rapoport, A., & Seale, D. (1995). Coordination in market entry games with symmetric players. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64, 203–218.
Weg, E., & Smith, V. (1993). On the failure to induce meager offers in ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Psychology, 14, 17–32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Brandts, J., Charness, G. The strategy versus the direct-response method: a first survey of experimental comparisons. Exp Econ 14, 375–398 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9272-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9272-x