Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

CI: bump staticcheck GHAction#49

Merged
philpennock merged 1 commit intomainfrom
pdp/bump-staticcheck
Mar 16, 2023
Merged

CI: bump staticcheck GHAction#49
philpennock merged 1 commit intomainfrom
pdp/bump-staticcheck

Conversation

@philpennock
Copy link
Member

For initial setup, I used the docs at https://staticcheck.io/docs/running-staticcheck/ci/github-actions/ which worked, but we noticed slightly late that there were deprecation warnings on our shiny new GitHub Action.
Meanwhile, https://github.com/marketplace/actions/staticcheck has a newer version of the action.

So bump the staticcheck action version (not the staticcheck binary version).

For initial setup, I used the docs at
<https://staticcheck.io/docs/running-staticcheck/ci/github-actions/> which
worked, but we noticed slightly late that there were deprecation warnings on
our shiny new GitHub Action.
Meanwhile, <https://github.com/marketplace/actions/staticcheck> has a newer
version of the action.

So bump the staticcheck action version (not the staticcheck binary version).
@philpennock philpennock requested review from aricart and wallyqs March 16, 2023 20:23
Copy link
Member

@aricart aricart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 4441310617

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 79.429%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 4441246471: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 417
Relevant Lines: 525

💛 - Coveralls

@philpennock philpennock merged commit 9fe76da into main Mar 16, 2023
@philpennock philpennock deleted the pdp/bump-staticcheck branch March 16, 2023 20:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants