Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

bench: call the function directly to improve the profiling + move the common functions in uucore #8716

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 23, 2025
Merged

bench: call the function directly to improve the profiling + move the common functions in uucore #8716

merged 5 commits into from
Sep 23, 2025

Conversation

@sylvestre
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Sep 23, 2025 •
edited
Loading

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #8716 will degrade performances by 100%

Comparing sylvestre:refactor (fa865ca) with main (4a92c9b)

Summary

❌ 45 (👁 45) regressions
⏩ 1 skipped1

Benchmarks breakdown

Benchmark BASE HEAD Change
👁 tsort_complex_dag[10000] 11.9 µs 155.4 µs -92.34%
👁 tsort_complex_dag[1000] 11.2 µs 155 µs -92.78%
👁 tsort_complex_dag[50000] 11.8 µs 155.1 µs -92.37%
👁 tsort_complex_dag[5000] 11.8 µs 155.7 µs -92.42%
👁 tsort_input_parsing_heavy[10000] 11.6 µs 148.4 µs -92.19%
👁 tsort_input_parsing_heavy[50000] 11.2 µs 154.6 µs -92.77%
👁 tsort_linear_chain[1000000] 10.8 µs 155.5 µs -93.03%
👁 tsort_linear_chain[100000] 11 µs 155.3 µs -92.94%
👁 tsort_linear_chain[10000] 11.8 µs 156.2 µs -92.43%
👁 tsort_linear_chain[1000] 11.2 µs 155 µs -92.78%
👁 tsort_tree_dag[(4, 3)] 10.9 µs 155.6 µs -92.98%
👁 tsort_tree_dag[(5, 3)] 10.9 µs 155.3 µs -92.96%
👁 tsort_tree_dag[(6, 2)] 11 µs 155.2 µs -92.94%
👁 tsort_tree_dag[(7, 2)] 10.9 µs 155.4 µs -92.97%
👁 tsort_wide_dag[100000] 11 µs 154.9 µs -92.89%
👁 tsort_wide_dag[10000] 11.7 µs 155 µs -92.45%
👁 tsort_wide_dag[50000] 10.9 µs 154.9 µs -92.98%
👁 wc_bytes_lines_synthetic[1000] 12.2 µs 5,731,885.9 µs -100%
👁 wc_bytes_lines_synthetic[100] 11.8 µs 573,360.5 µs -100%
👁 wc_bytes_lines_synthetic[10] 11.8 µs 57,507.3 µs -99.98%
... ... ... ... ...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Footnotes

  1. 1 benchmark was skipped, so the baseline result was used instead. If it was deleted from the codebase, click here and archive it to remove it from the performance reports. ↩

@github-actions
Copy link

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/misc/tee (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)

@sylvestre
Copy link
Contributor Author

The regressions are normal. codspeed wasn't analysis the binaries

@github-actions
Copy link

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/misc/tee (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/timeout/timeout (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

@sylvestre sylvestre marked this pull request as ready for review September 23, 2025 12:35
@sylvestre sylvestre merged commit 5287738 into uutils:main Sep 23, 2025
97 checks passed
@BrewTestBot BrewTestBot mentioned this pull request Oct 24, 2025
Merged
@moonfruit moonfruit mentioned this pull request Oct 27, 2025
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@sylvestre