NANOG Mailing List
The North American Network Operators' Group discusses fundamental Internet infrastructure issues such as routing, IP address allocation, and containing malicious activity.
List Archives
- Jan
- Feb
- Mar
- Apr
- May
- Jun
- Jul
- Aug
- Sep
- Oct
- Nov
- Dec
- 2026
- 213
- 153
- –
- –
- –
- –
- –
- –
- –
- –
- –
- –
- 2025
- 182
- 148
- 229
- 224
- 300
- 136
- 206
- 528
- 284
- 101
- 293
- 269
- 2024
- 468
- 367
- 206
- 192
- 225
- 119
- 171
- 152
- 143
- 128
- 283
- 281
- 2023
- 234
- 212
- 195
- 173
- 257
- 246
- 144
- 365
- 414
- 474
- 215
- 125
- 2022
- 414
- 370
- 968
- 369
- 302
- 379
- 251
- 338
- 236
- 203
- 235
- 135
- 2021
- 721
- 619
- 528
- 449
- 280
- 447
- 280
- 527
- 651
- 728
- 454
- 239
- 2020
- 659
- 461
- 821
- 544
- 461
- 651
- 449
- 534
- 476
- 473
- 345
- 372
- 2019
- 699
- 447
- 515
- 400
- 536
- 469
- 593
- 503
- 378
- 661
- 497
- 607
- 2018
- 386
- 203
- 397
- 418
- 504
- 423
- 508
- 269
- 373
- 485
- 322
- 620
- 2017
- 278
- 321
- 427
- 166
- 284
- 417
- 168
- 325
- 406
- 366
- 177
- 680
- 2016
- 680
- 515
- 536
- 513
- 499
- 854
- 515
- 388
- 587
- 661
- 338
- 380
- 2015
- 576
- 865
- 540
- 567
- 629
- 1363
- 1083
- 587
- 890
- 1344
- 497
- 618
- 2014
- 692
- 899
- 1041
- 885
- 681
- 540
- 1015
- 518
- 540
- 986
- 714
- 652
- 2013
- 931
- 1007
- 824
- 690
- 546
- 937
- 545
- 595
- 624
- 578
- 509
- 828
- 2012
- 1239
- 1367
- 1178
- 602
- 719
- 1107
- 891
- 774
- 953
- 681
- 879
- 697
- 2011
- 1789
- 2122
- 1029
- 802
- 962
- 1459
- 605
- 887
- 1148
- 802
- 976
- 993
- 2010
- 1136
- 1206
- 1305
- 1611
- 652
- 663
- 813
- 933
- 997
- 1339
- 1081
- 1476
- 2009
- 940
- 1254
- 552
- 1019
- 825
- 627
- 750
- 701
- 646
- 1105
- 884
- 956
- 2008
- 847
- 650
- 605
- 750
- 739
- 812
- 750
- 796
- 1027
- 536
- 628
- 716
- 2007
- 806
- 457
- 505
- 693
- 762
- 652
- 542
- 764
- 572
- 1022
- 355
- 299
- 2006
- 691
- 674
- 660
- 448
- 403
- 552
- 379
- 551
- 630
- 567
- 310
- 327
- 2005
- 824
- 619
- 915
- 1204
- 790
- 632
- 1075
- 1048
- 1085
- 1237
- 769
- 593
- 2004
- 852
- 1004
- 1182
- 891
- 785
- 1220
- 752
- 770
- 848
- 537
- 999
- 768
- 2003
- 1099
- 692
- 986
- 875
- 676
- 683
- 633
- 1529
- 1579
- 1527
- 757
- 675
- 2002
- 468
- 533
- 556
- 737
- 1171
- 979
- 1123
- 1097
- 815
- 714
- 735
- 575
- 2001
- 1088
- 949
- 1052
- 822
- 1145
- 1056
- 800
- 1150
- 1956
- 857
- 518
- 382
- 2000
- 468
- 684
- 338
- 498
- 539
- 617
- 716
- 497
- 634
- 323
- 651
- 550
- 1999
- 436
- 304
- 372
- 340
- 271
- 227
- 244
- 312
- 246
- 447
- 326
- 438
- 1998
- 404
- 633
- 431
- 576
- 862
- 796
- 285
- 629
- 754
- 1063
- 967
- 402
- 1997
- 720
- 507
- 576
- 486
- 796
- 613
- 1120
- 521
- 608
- 589
- 843
- 342
- 1996
- 364
- 213
- 275
- 496
- 290
- 233
- 349
- 333
- 903
- 1099
- 373
- 290
- 1995
- 94
- 74
- 191
- 267
- 171
- 25
- 150
- 253
- 251
- 210
- 391
- 140
- 1994
- –
- –
- –
- 161
- 44
- 59
- 33
- 49
- 116
- 84
- 54
- 52
Latest Posts
META. Performance degradation caused by uRPF or bundle issues within Meta network
Alejandro via NANOG (Feb 23)
Meta has a problem in its clusters in Boca Raton, Miami; this is affecting
the MNA content delivery network and direct content consumption. This has a
regional impact in Latin America, since so far most non-cacheable content
is consumed from the clusters in Florida. metafixthis.com
TCP retransmissions, mediocre performance, ICMP losses
[image: image.png]
How long AS-PATH policies have you used
Saku Ytti via NANOG (Feb 23)
We've had problems in various NOS in generating large prefix-lists. In
absolute configuration size, as well as prefix-set sizes.
I'd like to hear about operational experiences, how long AS-PATH
policies people have successfully run and in which NOS.
I am not interested in exact AS_PATH contents, I am only interested
that it contains a named set of AS numbers, in any order and any
repetition. In Junos speak ^[1 42 500 1212]*$
How many...
Re: Bad glue record in .NET zone
Robert McKay via NANOG (Feb 23)
So this is clearly a network solutions issue.. not something the
registry should get involved with. If their web interface doesn't let
you make the necessary changes go to their support and escalate. They
should be able to manually delete the old glue record. If you can't get
anywhere with that my practical suggestion is to temporarily transfer it
to a competent registrar, get the glue records sorted out and then if
you must, move...
RE: Bad glue record in .NET zone
John Palmer via NANOG (Feb 23)
Nope.
The issue is that the glue record SLD1.WORLDROOT.NET has the wrong IP address on it (198.180.140.223) in the
gtld-servers.net servers and there is no way that I can change it since Network Solutions has a broken website that
doesn't show any glue records unless they were created on their website. Our domains were originally created at another
registrar and apparently Network Solutions can't handle that.
NS1, NS2, KOVU, NEBULA...
Re: Bad glue record in .NET zone
Christopher Morrow via NANOG (Feb 22)
hazarding a guess: adns.net looks wonky :(
a.gtld-servers.net says: ( for and NS set query)
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
ns1.adns.net. 172800 IN A 199.5.157.2
ns2.adns.net. 172800 IN A 199.5.157.3
czones1.american-webmasters.net. 172800 IN A 199.5.157.129
czones2.american-webmasters.net. 172800 IN A 199.5.156.253
kovu.adns.net. 172800 IN A 199.5.157.52
nebula.adns.net. 172800 IN A 3.134.129.157
and the first in that list that replies fo dns requests:...
OARC 46 Call for Contributions
Willem Toorop via NANOG (Feb 22)
This workshop will be a hybrid event.
Date - 16-17 May 2026
Location - Edinburgh, Scotland
Times - approximately 09:00-16:00 UTC (Local time BST is UTC +1 )
Adjacent to - RIPE 92 (18 - 22 May 2026, https://ripe92.ripe.net/)
Deadline for Submissions - 2026-03-06 23:59 UTC
https://indico.dns-oarc.net/event/56/abstracts/
All DNS-related subjects and discussion topics are welcome although
we're particularly keen to hear more about...
Re: Bad glue record in .NET zone
John R. Levine via NANOG (Feb 22)
In 2000, Verisign bought Network Solutions which was the registry for
.COM, .NET, and .ORG. As part of the process that created ICANN, in 2003
Verisign spun off NetSol as a registrar, and transferred .ORG to PIR,
owned by the Internet Society. They kept the .COM and .NET registries.
These days NetSol has been rolled up into Newfold Digital along with a lot
of other registrars and hosting providers like web.com and Bluehost.
Verisign is...
Re: Bad glue record in .NET zone
Ibro Seremet via NANOG (Feb 22)
We (Verisign) are not aware of any operational issues. That said, I have reached out to John directly to see if we
could help troubleshoot the issue he is experiencing. @John please check my direct email to you.
Re: Bad glue record in .NET zone
Jonathan Lassoff via NANOG (Feb 22)
On Sat, Feb 21, 2026 at 20:39 John Levine via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
wrote:
Strong agree.
Actual names could garner actual help vs. just speculation.
I guess I mean what’s left of them, and what is now called Verisign.
The names on the domain haven’t changed, the stack has just changed owners.
Re: Bad glue record in .NET zone
John Levine via NANOG (Feb 21)
It appears that Jonathan Lassoff via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org> said:
Those seem reasonable but I agree that if you want help, the actual
names are essential.
No, that hasn't been the case for over 20 years.
R's,
John
Re: Router Recommendations
Mike Hammett via NANOG (Feb 21)
What are your experiences with a box with a Broadcom StrataDNX Qumran MX and BCM15K TCAM with OcNOS in the role of BGP
edge for a small network? ChatGPT says it should work for ~5 years at current FIB growth projections, but it would be
nice to hear from someone currently running that combination as to how it works for them.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
----- Original...
Re: Bad glue record in .NET zone
Warren Kumari via NANOG (Feb 21)
+1
Also, if you provide the actual domain name people will be much more able
to help you, for example by figuring out the registrar, if this does
actually look like an issue, etc.
W
Backhoes surround AT&T office in Arlington VA
Sean Donelan via NANOG (Feb 21)
The AT&T toll office in Arlington VA is surrounded by a half-dozen
backhoes (2 in front, more in the side-street around the corner). Instead
of the usual "call before you dig" markings, they had full crew of
professional surveyors marking a grid and repair trucks from
multiple telco/carriers standing by.
A lot of "suit & tie" folks on-site too.
Probability before I lose some service?...
Re: Bad glue record in .NET zone
Christopher Morrow via NANOG (Feb 21)
`550 Get a real e-mail address (ie one you pay for). We do not accept
GMAIL or Yahoo email - too much spam.` - kinda hard to help with this
sort of answer from your email service...
I'd also point out that you can't actually tell if a gmail user pays
for their account or not... but anyway, good luck !
Re: Bad glue record in .NET zone
Jonathan Lassoff via NANOG (Feb 20)
Generally you would need to change those values with the registrar.
Maybe try changing the registrar-set values to a different value and then
back? I'm thinking it might force an update message to refresh the state.
I think Network Solutions *is* in charge of gtld-servers.net
On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 at 15:59, John Palmer via NANOG <nanog () lists nanog org>
wrote:
More Lists
Dozens of other network security lists are archived at SecLists.Org.
