Function translate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 140 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
translate(keys, o, lastKey) {
let opt = typeof o === 'object' ? { ...o } : o;
if (typeof opt !== 'object' && this.options.overloadTranslationOptionHandler) {
/* eslint prefer-rest-params: 0 */
opt = this.options.overloadTranslationOptionHandler(arguments);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File Translator.js
has 519 lines of code (exceeds 300 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import baseLogger from './logger.js';
import EventEmitter from './EventEmitter.js';
import postProcessor from './postProcessor.js';
import { copy as utilsCopy, looksLikeObjectPath, isString } from './utils.js';
Function translate
has 220 lines of code (exceeds 70 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
translate(keys, o, lastKey) {
let opt = typeof o === 'object' ? { ...o } : o;
if (typeof opt !== 'object' && this.options.overloadTranslationOptionHandler) {
/* eslint prefer-rest-params: 0 */
opt = this.options.overloadTranslationOptionHandler(arguments);
Function extendTranslation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
extendTranslation(res, key, opt, resolved, lastKey) {
if (this.i18nFormat?.parse) {
res = this.i18nFormat.parse(
res,
{ ...this.options.interpolation.defaultVariables, ...opt },
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function extractFromKey
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
extractFromKey(key, opt) {
let nsSeparator = opt.nsSeparator !== undefined ? opt.nsSeparator : this.options.nsSeparator;
if (nsSeparator === undefined) nsSeparator = ':';
const keySeparator =
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function resolve
has 88 lines of code (exceeds 70 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
resolve(keys, opt = {}) {
let found;
let usedKey; // plain key
let exactUsedKey; // key with context / plural
let usedLng;
Function extendTranslation
has 73 lines of code (exceeds 70 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
extendTranslation(res, key, opt, resolved, lastKey) {
if (this.i18nFormat?.parse) {
res = this.i18nFormat.parse(
res,
{ ...this.options.interpolation.defaultVariables, ...opt },
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (
needsZeroSuffixLookup &&
opt[`defaultValue${this.options.pluralSeparator}zero`] &&
suffixes.indexOf(`${this.options.pluralSeparator}zero`) < 0
) {
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
} else if (handleAsObjectInI18nFormat && isString(joinArrays) && Array.isArray(res)) {
// array special treatment
res = res.join(joinArrays);
if (res) res = this.extendTranslation(res, keys, opt, lastKey);
} else {
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return resolved;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return r;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return key;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return res;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return resolved;
Function getUsedParamsDetails
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
getUsedParamsDetails(options = {}) {
// we need to remember to extend this array whenever new option properties are added
const optionsKeys = [
'defaultValue',
'ordinal',
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (needsPluralHandling) {
finalKeys.push(key + pluralSuffix);
if (opt.ordinal && pluralSuffix.indexOf(ordinalPrefix) === 0) {
finalKeys.push(
key + pluralSuffix.replace(ordinalPrefix, this.options.pluralSeparator),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 100.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (needsPluralHandling) {
finalKeys.push(contextKey + pluralSuffix);
if (opt.ordinal && pluralSuffix.indexOf(ordinalPrefix) === 0) {
finalKeys.push(
contextKey + pluralSuffix.replace(ordinalPrefix, this.options.pluralSeparator),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 100.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76