Nudgers
November 12, 2025
3-Item Status
Current Location: Milwaukee, WI
Reading: Sleeper Beach by Nick Harkaway
Listening: Shell (of a Man) by Saya Gray
If you have a moment, reply with your own 3-Item Status.
Quick Notes
New Work:
This week’s Let’s Know Things is about Nitazenes
This week’s Brain Lenses essay is about Choline and Anxiety & the pod is on Representation Gaps
This week’s Writing & Such is about Making the Time
Nudgers
There’s an argument to be made that we should all be creating for AI. Doing so, it’s been posited, is the best way to ensure our work, our thoughts, our history and experiences are well documented by the archivists of the future.
There’s an argument to be made that we should all be creating for social media, optimizing our output for the trends these platforms’ algos prefer (currently), and which they are thus more likely to place in front of more eyeballs (and ears).
This isn’t new: if we’re not creating for the AIs or socials, we’re writing for the search engines, critics, or other middleman between maker and consumer. It’s also not novel for such forces to nudge us in specific directions (those favoring their priorities), and some of these forces will make a good case for that nudging, others will fail to, and still others will nudge us without our even realizing they’re doing so.
I could choose to be nudged, then, and I might enjoy some real, tangible benefits for making that choice.
But is that how I want to live my life? Spending grand sums of my finite thoughts, hours, and energy to churn out stuff I know is good for the machines (or some sentient gatekeeper), rather than the work I actually want to be sharing with other humans?
There’s a balance here, of course. Just as there’s a balance between doing the work I want to be doing (in its purest, most Platonic possible form) and doing the work I want to be doing in such a way that I’m able to make a living from it.
I have bills, I have to pay the rent, I have to eat. We all have external variables shaping, to greater and lesser degrees, that which we produce. We have some choice about some of the specifics, but it’s arguably impossible to create something that’s just ours, free from any outside influence.
I think it’s possible to prioritize our own voices and aspirations over those of life’s many nudgers, but I also know that the more we opt for that kind of purity, the fewer distribution and curatorial avenues will be available to us; which will be a more than acceptable trade-off for some, but unworkable for most.
The real challenge, then, is finding the exact right formula: a balance between purity and access, so that the costs paid and points conceded allow us, over time, to pay and concede less while making something that’s increasingly our own.
If you enjoyed this essay, consider supporting my work by becoming a paid subscriber, buying me a coffee, or grabbing one of my books.
Interesting Links
If you want more links to interesting things, consider subscribing to Aspiring Generalist.

What Else
Ariana is finally home from Jamaica! We’re celebrating her (much later than anticipated) return by making a lot of cozy food and playing D&D with our gaming group tonight.
I’m about halfway through a second draft of Methuselahs, and still in the querying trenches with Yore (since we’re approaching the holidays, I strongly suspect that will remain the case until sometime next year).
Loving the cold weather we’ve been having in Milwaukee, and have so far confirmed that my winter workout gears allows me to comfortably run when it’s a windy 10-degrees (F) outside. Hoping it works even lower, too, as I find treadmills super boring, and the temps are dropping fast, but we’ll see.
Say Hello
New here? Hit reply and tell me something about yourself!
You can also fill me in on something interesting you’re working on or something random you’re learning about.
I respond to every message I receive and would love to hear from you :)
Prefer stamps and paper? Send a letter, postcard, or some other physical communication to: Colin Wright, PO Box 11442, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA
Or hit me up via other methods: Instagram, Threads, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, or job offer negotiation.


The “Baby Shoggoth” piece you linked in Writing & Such was so odd. It put existential stakes on a far-fetched concept that still managed to feel impactful as a reader. I left it with at least some anxiety. The author seems sincere and self aware, which helped with my suspension of disbelief. I found the supposition that a Super Intelligence would be able to simulate a person based on their writing alone to be quite a conclusive leap. My understanding is that full simulation of a complex system is one of the hardest things in computation. Even modern supercomputers have to use simplified, idealized models when creating sophisticated simulations. Reality is quite dense in information. If we assume the SI can scale their computation indefinitely, sure, it’s almost like anything can happen. But that’s quite the assumption. My point being that writing for an AI as a prioritization machine for other humans makes some sort of sense. As you mentioned, some of us already choose to do it. Writing to catch the eye of an eldritch alien consciousness in hopes that they will invite you for tea… now that feels like a great short story prompt.