fix(cli-agent-readiness-reviewer): remove top-5 cap on improvements#419
Merged
Conversation
…oritized improvements The report template's short numbered list pattern was causing the agent to consistently limit recommendations to 5, even when more findings existed. Now explicitly instructs listing all findings with enough detail per item (title + location + fix) to act on without cross-referencing the detailed section. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The cli-agent-readiness-reviewer was consistently producing only 5 items in its "Highest-Impact Improvements" section, even when more findings existed. The template pattern (
1./2. ...) was implicitly signaling a short list to the model.Renamed the section to "Prioritized Improvements" and added explicit instructions to list all findings ordered by impact with enough detail per item (title line + location and fix) to be actionable without cross-referencing the detailed findings section.
🤖 Generated with Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context, extended thinking) via Claude Code