Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

feat(ce-plan): add conditional visual aids to plan documents#440

Merged
tmchow merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
feat/plan-visual-aids
Mar 29, 2026
Merged

feat(ce-plan): add conditional visual aids to plan documents#440
tmchow merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
feat/plan-visual-aids

Conversation

@tmchow
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@tmchow tmchow commented Mar 29, 2026

Summary

  • Adds Section 4.4 "Visual Communication in Plan Documents" to ce:plan -- content-pattern triggers for when to include dependency graphs, interaction diagrams, and comparison tables in plan documents
  • Distinct from Section 3.4 (solution-level technical design) and the existing Section 4.3 mermaid rule -- this guidance covers plan-document readability
  • Adds one pre-finalization checklist item to Phase 5.1 for visual aid consideration
  • Preserves existing template structure, Section 3.4, and planning rules intact

Context

Extends the visual aids work from #437 (ce:brainstorm) to the planning level. Evidence from real plans (release automation, merge-deepen-into-plan, adversarial review agents) showed that plans with 5+ non-linear units and dense System-Wide Impact sections would benefit from inline visual aids for reader comprehension.

Test plan

  • Verify bun test passes (506 tests, all green)
  • Verify bun run release:validate passes
  • Run ce:plan on a multi-unit feature -- should produce inline dependency graph when 4+ non-linear units exist
  • Run ce:plan on a simple 2-unit feature -- should produce no plan-readability visual aids
  • Run ce:plan on a feature with complex System-Wide Impact -- should produce interaction diagram
  • Verify Section 3.4 High-Level Technical Design is unchanged and not duplicated

Post-Deploy Monitoring & Validation

No additional operational monitoring required -- this is a skill prompt change with no runtime infrastructure impact. Quality validation is behavioral: observe plan output documents for appropriate diagram inclusion over the next few uses.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

tmchow and others added 2 commits March 29, 2026 12:14
Add visual communication guidance to Phase 4 of ce:plan so plan
documents can include dependency graphs, interaction diagrams, and
comparison tables when the content warrants it. Triggers are
content-pattern-based (4+ non-linear units, 3+ interacting surfaces,
3+ modes), not depth-based. Distinct from Section 3.4 which covers
solution-level technical design diagrams -- this guidance covers
plan-document readability aids.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Skills are self-contained and cannot reference each other's guidance.
Restate the format selection framework with plan-appropriate detail
(node counts, ASCII/box-drawing with vertical stacking, plan-structure
level constraint) rather than referencing brainstorm's framework.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <[email protected]>
@tmchow tmchow merged commit 4c7f51f into main Mar 29, 2026
2 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request Mar 29, 2026
tmchow added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 29, 2026
Add a Visual communication subsection to Step 6 with content-pattern-based
triggers for including mermaid diagrams, ASCII art, and comparison tables
in PR descriptions. Follows the same conditional approach as ce:brainstorm
(#437) and ce:plan (#440), calibrated for the PR scanning context with a
higher trigger bar and smaller diagrams (5-10 nodes typical).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant