Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

The probelm about simulation and MEG mapping #7

@sjbt007

Description

@sjbt007

Hi Luke,
Sourry to distrub you. Recently I face some warning about the dataset I created from T1.gmz by freesurfer when I change the signal to eeg/meg map.

The probelms I faced with are about the simulation and the function :

elec_pos = _find_topomap_coords(self.info, self.info.ch_names,ignore_overlap=True) in 625 of net.py of esinet.

image

The probelms are:
image
image

and
image

What's more I face another probelm about the channel type when I simulate data. The problem is
image

image

There are two type of my meg channel but I don't know how to drop them. So I comment these code out. But I worry about it will have bad effect on the simulated data.

The workflow of creating fwd.fif.
I firstly use the Freesurfer and
mne.bem.make_watershed_bem(subject=subject, subjects_dir=subjects_dir,
overwrite=True, verbose=True, show=False)
make_scalp_surfaces(subject,subjects_dir=subjects_dir,overwrite=True)

to creat bem layer from T1.mgz of subject and follow the tutorial of MNE to coregistate the bem forward model to get fwd.fif

The link is https://mne.tools/stable/auto_tutorials/forward/25_automated_coreg.html

To sum up, I face four problem. One is about the two channel types when I simulate data, others are about the elec_pos = _find_topomap_coords warnings

I dont know how to deal with them and if they have great negtivate effects on the result we get.
Looking for your relpy. Thanks.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions