Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Query about Mr. Mime's evolution chain correctness #274

@ChrisMash

Description

@ChrisMash

I wanted to enquire about whether anyone agreed with me that Mr. Mime's evolution chain should be modified.

This might just be something that suits my project, so feel free to say "nah it's how it's intended"!

Currently it's Mime Jr. -> Mr. Mime -> Mr. Rime (

)

AFAIK the actual reality is: Mime Jr. -> Mr. Mime and Galarian Mr. Mime -> Mr. Rime

So would it be best to split the evolution chain in two, otherwise the only assumption you can really make from the data is that Mime Jr. can evolve all the way to Mr. Rime, which I don't believe is the case?

I could be wrong, I've not played most of the games, but what I've said is true in Pokemon Go at least!

I'd be happy to raise a PR with the change if it's agreed upon, just wanted to see what people thought before I went to the effort of figuring it out!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions