Use the Gaufrette FilesystemInterface instead of a concrete implementation#13601
Merged
Conversation
Roshyo
approved these changes
Feb 8, 2022
GSadee
approved these changes
Apr 20, 2022
Member
|
The base of this pull-request was changed, you need fetch and reset your local branch Unless you added new commits (to this branch) locally that you did not push yet, Feel free to ask for assistance when you get stuck 👍 |
Member
|
Thanks, Michael! 🥇 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The image uploader has a dependency to a concrete class instead of the interface. This widens the parameter type to allow the interface.