-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
Fix/FSRS simulator fallback to memory_state_from_sm2 for after setting “Ignore cards reviewed before” #4187
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
L-M-Sherlock
wants to merge
8
commits into
ankitects:main
from
L-M-Sherlock:Fix/FSRS-simulator-fallback-to-memory_state_from_sm2-for-after-setting-“Ignore-cards-reviewed-before”
The head ref may contain hidden characters: "Fix/FSRS-simulator-fallback-to-memory_state_from_sm2-for-after-setting-\u201CIgnore-cards-reviewed-before\u201D"
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1081053
Fix/FSRS simulator fallback to memory_state_from_sm2 for after settin…
L-M-Sherlock 267f763
add comment to fsrs_item_for_memory_state
L-M-Sherlock d159aaa
Add historical retention field to FSRS review request and update rela…
L-M-Sherlock 7c9e8ee
Update rslib/src/scheduler/fsrs/memory_state.rs
L-M-Sherlock 824da30
Update rslib/src/scheduler/fsrs/simulator.rs
L-M-Sherlock cef825b
pass ci
L-M-Sherlock 2c7241c
Update rslib/src/scheduler/fsrs/simulator.rs
L-M-Sherlock b253983
format
L-M-Sherlock File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't we exclude new cards here to improve performance and prevent introduction of new bugs?
Edit:
filter(is_included_card)already excludes the new cards. I got confused byCardQueue::New => None,in theconvertfunction. That's not actually needed, IMO.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's required by Rust's compiler.