You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Have it been considered to add support for CANopen FD (CiA 1301)? Is it of interest to add support for it in this library, or would it better live in another?
The concepts are very similar, but there are protocol differences. E.g. EMCY have a larger payload, a new Universal SDO (USDO) protocol to mention two examples.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
sveinse
changed the title
Support CANopen (CiA 1301)?
Support CANopen FD (CiA 1301)?
May 31, 2024
Someone with more experience / insight of CANopen FD needs to judge this. I'd say if a lot of functionality from the current library can be re-used, then why not. Certainly creating a separate library for FD will cause some extra effort that could be avoided. And especially for users wanting to support both protocols in one application, the split would make it cumbersome I guess.
Have it been considered to add support for CANopen FD (CiA 1301)? Is it of interest to add support for it in this library, or would it better live in another?
The concepts are very similar, but there are protocol differences. E.g. EMCY have a larger payload, a new Universal SDO (USDO) protocol to mention two examples.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: