Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

chore: bump purego to build against newer go #18021

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

chenrui333
Copy link

@chenrui333 chenrui333 commented May 24, 2025

seeing build failure as below when building 2.21.3 release on homebrew side

  link: duplicated definition of symbol dlopen, from github.com/ebitengine/purego and github.com/ebitengine/purego

relates to:


I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

@cdr-bot cdr-bot bot added the community Pull Requests and issues created by the community. label May 24, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 24, 2025

All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅
Posted by the CLA Assistant Lite bot.

@chenrui333
Copy link
Author

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

cdrci2 added a commit to coder/cla that referenced this pull request May 24, 2025
@chenrui333 chenrui333 changed the title build: bump purego to build against newer go fix: bump purego to build against newer go May 24, 2025
@matifali matifali enabled auto-merge (squash) May 24, 2025 04:29
@matifali matifali disabled auto-merge May 24, 2025 04:29
@matifali matifali changed the title fix: bump purego to build against newer go chore: bump purego to build against newer go May 24, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale This issue is like stale bread. label Jun 1, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Jun 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
community Pull Requests and issues created by the community. stale This issue is like stale bread.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant