Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

[FEATURE] Why does Documentation Coverage not account for types/type aliases? #1517

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
vogloblinsky opened this issue Sep 27, 2024 Discussed in #1516 · 1 comment
Closed

[FEATURE] Why does Documentation Coverage not account for types/type aliases? #1517

vogloblinsky opened this issue Sep 27, 2024 Discussed in #1516 · 1 comment

Comments

@vogloblinsky
Copy link
Contributor

Discussed in #1516

Originally posted by edumserrano September 27, 2024
When looking at the Documentation Coverage for my library it shows:

  • function
  • variable
  • injectable
  • class
  • interface
  • directive

But I have many types under the Miscellaneous -> Type Aliases section that aren't checked for documentation coverage.

Are types not supported for Documentation Coverage or am I doing something wrong?
@edumserrano
Copy link

edumserrano commented Oct 7, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Thank you for the quick fix @vogloblinsky 👏

Any clue when there will be a release with this fix?

EDIT: I can see this was recently released with version 1.1.26. I've tested and can confirm this is working as expected. Thank you 🥇

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@vogloblinsky @edumserrano