forked from SigmaHQ/sigma
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathtest_rules.py
More file actions
executable file
·752 lines (644 loc) · 35.1 KB
/
test_rules.py
File metadata and controls
executable file
·752 lines (644 loc) · 35.1 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
Checks for noncompliance or common errors on all rules
Run using the command
# python test_rules.py
"""
import os
import unittest
import yaml
import re
from attackcti import attack_client
from colorama import init
from colorama import Fore
class TestRules(unittest.TestCase):
MITRE_TECHNIQUE_NAMES = ["process_injection", "signed_binary_proxy_execution", "process_injection"] # incomplete list
MITRE_TACTICS = ["initial_access", "execution", "persistence", "privilege_escalation", "defense_evasion", "credential_access", "discovery", "lateral_movement", "collection", "exfiltration", "command_and_control", "impact", "launch"]
# Don't use trademarks in rules - they require non-ASCII characters to be used on we don't want them in our rules
TRADE_MARKS = {"MITRE ATT&CK", "ATT&CK"}
path_to_rules = "rules"
# Helper functions
def yield_next_rule_file_path(self, path_to_rules:str) -> str:
for root, _, files in os.walk(path_to_rules):
for file in files:
yield os.path.join(root, file)
def get_rule_part(self, file_path:str, part_name:str):
yaml_dicts = self.get_rule_yaml(file_path)
for yaml_part in yaml_dicts:
if part_name in yaml_part.keys():
return yaml_part[part_name]
return None
def get_rule_yaml(self, file_path:str) -> dict:
data = []
with open(file_path,encoding='utf-8') as f:
yaml_parts = yaml.safe_load_all(f)
for part in yaml_parts:
data.append(part)
return data
# Tests
# def test_confirm_extension_is_yml(self):
# files_with_incorrect_extensions = []
# for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
# file_name_and_extension = os.path.splitext(file)
# if len(file_name_and_extension) == 2:
# extension = file_name_and_extension[1]
# if extension != ".yml":
# files_with_incorrect_extensions.append(file)
# self.assertEqual(files_with_incorrect_extensions, [], Fore.RED +
# "There are rule files with extensions other than .yml")
def test_legal_trademark_violations(self):
files_with_legal_issues = []
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
with open(file, 'r',encoding='utf-8') as fh:
file_data = fh.read()
for tm in self.TRADE_MARKS:
if tm in file_data:
files_with_legal_issues.append(file)
self.assertEqual(files_with_legal_issues, [], Fore.RED +
"There are rule files which contains a trademark or reference that doesn't comply with the respective trademark requirements - please remove the trademark to avoid legal issues")
def test_optional_tags(self):
files_with_incorrect_tags = []
tags_pattern = re.compile(r"cve\.\d+\.\d+|attack\.t\d+\.*\d*|attack\.[a-z_]+|car\.\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{3}")
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
tags = self.get_rule_part(file_path=file, part_name="tags")
if tags:
for tag in tags:
if tags_pattern.match(tag) == None:
print(Fore.RED + "Rule {} has the invalid tag <{}>".format(file, tag))
files_with_incorrect_tags.append(file)
self.assertEqual(files_with_incorrect_tags, [], Fore.RED +
"There are rules with incorrect/unknown MITRE Tags. (please inform us about new tags that are not yet supported in our tests) and check the correct tags here: https://attack.mitre.org/ ")
def test_confirm_correct_mitre_tags(self):
files_with_incorrect_mitre_tags = []
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
tags = self.get_rule_part(file_path=file, part_name="tags")
if tags:
for tag in tags:
if tag not in MITRE_ALL and tag.startswith("attack."):
print(Fore.RED + "Rule {} has the following incorrect tag {}".format(file, tag))
files_with_incorrect_mitre_tags.append(file)
self.assertEqual(files_with_incorrect_mitre_tags, [], Fore.RED +
"There are rules with incorrect/unknown MITRE Tags. (please inform us about new tags that are not yet supported in our tests) and check the correct tags here: https://attack.mitre.org/ ")
def test_duplicate_tags(self):
files_with_incorrect_mitre_tags = []
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
tags = self.get_rule_part(file_path=file, part_name="tags")
if tags:
known_tags = []
for tag in tags:
if tag in known_tags:
print(Fore.RED + "Rule {} has the duplicate tag {}".format(file, tag))
files_with_incorrect_mitre_tags.append(file)
else:
known_tags.append(tag)
self.assertEqual(files_with_incorrect_mitre_tags, [], Fore.RED +
"There are rules with duplicate tags")
def test_look_for_duplicate_filters(self):
def check_list_or_recurse_on_dict(item, depth:int) -> None:
if type(item) == list:
check_if_list_contain_duplicates(item, depth)
elif type(item) == dict and depth <= MAX_DEPTH:
for sub_item in item.values():
check_list_or_recurse_on_dict(sub_item, depth + 1)
def check_if_list_contain_duplicates(item:list, depth:int) -> None:
try:
if len(item) != len(set(item)):
print(Fore.RED + "Rule {} has duplicate filters".format(file))
files_with_duplicate_filters.append(file)
except:
# unhashable types like dictionaries
for sub_item in item:
if type(sub_item) == dict and depth <= MAX_DEPTH:
check_list_or_recurse_on_dict(sub_item, depth + 1)
MAX_DEPTH = 3
files_with_duplicate_filters = []
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
detection = self.get_rule_part(file_path=file, part_name="detection")
check_list_or_recurse_on_dict(detection, 1)
self.assertEqual(files_with_duplicate_filters, [], Fore.RED +
"There are rules with duplicate filters")
def test_field_name_with_space(self):
def key_iterator(fields, faulty):
for key, value in fields.items():
if " " in key:
faulty.append(key)
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has a space in field name ({}).".format(file, key))
if type(value) == dict:
key_iterator(value, faulty)
faulty_fieldnames = []
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
yaml = self.get_rule_yaml(file_path = file)
detection = self.get_rule_part(file_path = file, part_name = "detection")
key_iterator(detection, faulty_fieldnames)
self.assertEqual(faulty_fieldnames, [], Fore.RED +
"There are rules with an unsupported field name. Spaces are not allowed. (Replace space with an underscore character '_' )")
def test_single_named_condition_with_x_of_them(self):
faulty_detections = []
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
yaml = self.get_rule_yaml(file_path = file)
detection = self.get_rule_part(file_path = file, part_name = "detection")
has_them_in_condition = "them" in detection["condition"]
has_only_one_named_condition = len(detection) == 2
not_multipart_yaml_file = len(yaml) == 1
if has_them_in_condition and \
has_only_one_named_condition and \
not_multipart_yaml_file:
faulty_detections.append(file)
self.assertEqual(faulty_detections, [], Fore.RED +
"There are rules using '1/all of them' style conditions but only have one condition")
def test_all_of_them_condition(self):
faulty_detections = []
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
yaml = self.get_rule_yaml(file_path = file)
detection = self.get_rule_part(file_path = file, part_name = "detection")
if "all of them" in detection["condition"]:
faulty_detections.append(file)
self.assertEqual(faulty_detections, [], Fore.RED +
"There are rules using 'all of them'. Better use e.g. 'all of selection*' instead (and use the 'selection_' prefix as search-identifier).")
def test_duplicate_detections(self):
def compare_detections(detection1:dict, detection2:dict) -> bool:
# detections not the same count can't be the same
if len(detection1) != len(detection2):
return False
for named_condition in detection1:
#don't check timeframes
if named_condition == "timeframe":
continue
# condition clause must be the same too
if named_condition == "condition":
if detection1["condition"] != detection2["condition"]:
return False
else:
continue
# Named condition must exist in both rule files
if named_condition not in detection2:
return False
#can not be the same if len is not equal
if len(detection1[named_condition]) != len(detection2[named_condition]):
return False
for condition in detection1[named_condition]:
if type(condition) != str:
return False
if condition not in detection2[named_condition]:
return False
condition_value1 = detection1[named_condition][condition]
condition_value2 = detection2[named_condition][condition]
if condition_value1 != condition_value2:
return False
return True
faulty_detections = []
files_and_their_detections = {}
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
detection = self.get_rule_part(file_path = file, part_name = "detection")
logsource = self.get_rule_part(file_path = file, part_name = "logsource")
detection["logsource"] = {}
detection["logsource"].update(logsource)
yaml = self.get_rule_yaml(file_path = file)
is_multipart_yaml_file = len(yaml) != 1
if is_multipart_yaml_file:
continue
for key in files_and_their_detections:
if compare_detections(detection, files_and_their_detections[key]):
faulty_detections.append((key, file))
files_and_their_detections[file] = detection
self.assertEqual(faulty_detections, [], Fore.YELLOW +
"There are rule files with exactly the same detection logic.")
def test_source_eventlog(self):
faulty_detections = []
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
detection = self.get_rule_part(file_path = file, part_name = "detection")
detection_str = str(detection).lower()
if "'source': 'eventlog'" in detection_str:
faulty_detections.append(file)
self.assertEqual(faulty_detections, [], Fore.YELLOW +
"There are detections with 'Source: Eventlog'. This does not add value to the detection.")
def test_event_id_instead_of_process_creation(self):
faulty_detections = []
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
with open(file,encoding='utf-8') as f:
for line in f:
if re.search(r'.*EventID: (?:1|4688)\s*$', line) and file not in faulty_detections:
faulty_detections.append(file)
self.assertEqual(faulty_detections, [], Fore.YELLOW +
"There are rules still using Sysmon 1 or Event ID 4688. Please migrate to the process_creation category.")
def test_missing_id(self):
faulty_rules = []
dict_id = {}
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
id = self.get_rule_part(file_path=file, part_name="id")
if not id:
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has no field 'id'.".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
elif len(id) != 36:
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has a malformed 'id' (not 36 chars).".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
elif id in dict_id.keys():
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has the same 'id' than {} must be unique.".format(file,dict_id[id]))
faulty_rules.append(file)
else:
dict_id[id] = file
self.assertEqual(faulty_rules, [], Fore.RED +
"There are rules with missing or malformed 'id' fields. Create an id (e.g. here: https://www.uuidgenerator.net/version4) and add it to the reported rule(s).")
def test_optional_related(self):
faulty_rules = []
valid_type = [
"derived",
"obsoletes",
"merged",
"renamed",
]
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
related_lst = self.get_rule_part(file_path=file, part_name="related")
if related_lst:
# it exists but isn't a list
if not isinstance(related_lst, list):
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has a 'related' field that isn't a list.".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
else:
# should probably test if we have only 'id' and 'type' ...
type_ok = True
for ref in related_lst:
id_str = ref['id']
type_str = ref['type']
if not type_str in valid_type:
type_ok = False
#Only add one time if many bad type in the same file
if type_ok == False:
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has a 'related/type' invalid value.".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
self.assertEqual(faulty_rules, [], Fore.RED +
"There are rules with malformed optional 'related' fields. (check https://github.com/SigmaHQ/sigma/wiki/Specification)")
def test_sysmon_rule_without_eventid(self):
faulty_rules = []
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
logsource = self.get_rule_part(file_path=file, part_name="logsource")
if logsource:
service = logsource.get('service', '')
if service.lower() == 'sysmon':
with open(file,encoding='utf-8') as f:
found = False
for line in f:
if re.search(r'.*EventID:.*$', line): # might be on a single line or in multiple lines
found = True
break
if not found:
faulty_rules.append(file)
self.assertEqual(faulty_rules, [], Fore.RED +
"There are rules using sysmon events but with no EventID specified")
def test_missing_date(self):
faulty_rules = []
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
datefield = self.get_rule_part(file_path=file, part_name="date")
if not datefield:
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has no field 'date'.".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
elif not isinstance(datefield, str):
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has a malformed 'date' (should be YYYY/MM/DD).".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
elif len(datefield) != 10:
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has a malformed 'date' (not 10 chars, should be YYYY/MM/DD).".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
elif datefield[4] != '/' or datefield[7] != '/':
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has a malformed 'date' (should be YYYY/MM/DD).".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
self.assertEqual(faulty_rules, [], Fore.RED +
"There are rules with missing or malformed 'date' fields. (create one, e.g. date: 2019/01/14)")
def test_optional_date_modified(self):
faulty_rules = []
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
modifiedfield = self.get_rule_part(file_path=file, part_name="modified")
if modifiedfield:
if not isinstance(modifiedfield, str):
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has a malformed 'modified' (should be YYYY/MM/DD).".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
elif len(modifiedfield) != 10:
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has a malformed 'modified' (not 10 chars, should be YYYY/MM/DD).".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
elif modifiedfield[4] != '/' or modifiedfield[7] != '/':
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has a malformed 'modified' (should be YYYY/MM/DD).".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
self.assertEqual(faulty_rules, [], Fore.RED +
"There are rules with malformed 'modified' fields. (create one, e.g. date: 2019/01/14)")
def test_optional_status(self):
faulty_rules = []
valid_status = [
"stable",
"test",
"experimental",
"deprecated",
"unsupported"
]
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
status_str = self.get_rule_part(file_path=file, part_name="status")
if status_str:
if not status_str in valid_status:
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has a invalid 'status' (check wiki).".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
elif status_str == "unsupported":
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has the unsupported 'status', can not be in rules directory".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
self.assertEqual(faulty_rules, [], Fore.RED +
"There are rules with malformed 'status' fields. (check https://github.com/SigmaHQ/sigma/wiki/Specification)")
def test_level(self):
faulty_rules = []
valid_level = [
"informational",
"low",
"medium",
"high",
"critical",
]
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
level_str = self.get_rule_part(file_path=file, part_name="level")
if not level_str:
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has no field 'level'.".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
elif not level_str in valid_level:
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has a invalid 'level' (check wiki).".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
self.assertEqual(faulty_rules, [], Fore.RED +
"There are rules with missing or malformed 'level' fields. (check https://github.com/SigmaHQ/sigma/wiki/Specification)")
def test_optional_fields(self):
faulty_rules = []
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
fields_str = self.get_rule_part(file_path=file, part_name="fields")
if fields_str:
# it exists but isn't a list
if not isinstance(fields_str, list):
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has a 'fields' field that isn't a list.".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
self.assertEqual(faulty_rules, [], Fore.RED +
"There are rules with malformed optional 'fields' fields. (has to be a list of values even if it contains only a single value)")
def test_optional_falsepositives(self):
faulty_rules = []
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
falsepositives_str = self.get_rule_part(file_path=file, part_name="falsepositives")
if falsepositives_str:
# it exists but isn't a list
if not isinstance(falsepositives_str, list):
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has a 'falsepositives' field that isn't a list.".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
self.assertEqual(faulty_rules, [], Fore.RED +
"There are rules with malformed optional 'falsepositives' fields. (has to be a list of values even if it contains only a single value)")
# Upgrade Detection Rule License 1.1
def test_optional_author(self):
faulty_rules = []
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
author_str = self.get_rule_part(file_path=file, part_name="author")
if author_str:
# it exists but isn't a string
if not isinstance(author_str, str):
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has a 'author' field that isn't a string.".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
self.assertEqual(faulty_rules, [], Fore.RED +
"There are rules with malformed 'author' fields. (has to be a string even if it contains many author)")
def test_optional_license(self):
faulty_rules = []
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
license_str = self.get_rule_part(file_path=file, part_name="license")
if license_str:
if not isinstance(license_str, str):
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has a malformed 'license' (has to be a string).".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
self.assertEqual(faulty_rules, [], Fore.RED +
"There are rules with malformed 'license' fields. (has to be a string )")
def test_optional_tlp(self):
faulty_rules = []
valid_tlp = [
"WHITE",
"GREEN",
"AMBER",
"RED",
]
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
tlp_str = self.get_rule_part(file_path=file, part_name="tlp")
if tlp_str:
# it exists but isn't a string
if not isinstance(tlp_str, str):
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has a 'tlp' field that isn't a string.".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
elif not tlp_str.upper() in valid_tlp:
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has a 'tlp' field with not valid value.".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
self.assertEqual(faulty_rules, [], Fore.RED +
"There are rules with malformed optional 'tlp' fields. (https://www.cisa.gov/tlp)")
def test_optional_target(self):
faulty_rules = []
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
target = self.get_rule_part(file_path=file, part_name="target")
if target:
# it exists but isn't a list
if not isinstance(target, list):
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has a 'target' field that isn't a list.".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
self.assertEqual(faulty_rules, [], Fore.RED +
"There are rules with malformed 'target' fields. (has to be a list of values even if it contains only a single value)")
def test_references(self):
faulty_rules = []
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
references = self.get_rule_part(file_path=file, part_name="references")
# Reference field doesn't exist
# if not references:
# print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has no field 'references'.".format(file))
# faulty_rules.append(file)
if references:
# it exists but isn't a list
if not isinstance(references, list):
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has a references field that isn't a list.".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
self.assertEqual(faulty_rules, [], Fore.RED +
"There are rules with malformed 'references' fields. (has to be a list of values even if it contains only a single value)")
def test_references_plural(self):
faulty_rules = []
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
reference = self.get_rule_part(file_path=file, part_name="reference")
if reference:
# it exists but in singular form
faulty_rules.append(file)
self.assertEqual(faulty_rules, [], Fore.RED +
"There are rules with malformed 'references' fields. (has to be 'references' in plural form, not singular)")
def test_file_names(self):
faulty_rules = []
name_lst = []
filename_pattern = re.compile('[a-z0-9_]{10,70}\.yml')
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
filename = os.path.basename(file)
if filename in name_lst:
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} is a duplicate file name.".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
elif filename[-4:] != ".yml":
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has a invalid extension (.yml).".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
elif len(filename) > 74:
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has a file name too long >70.".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
elif len(filename) < 14:
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has a file name too sort <10.".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
elif filename_pattern.match(filename) == None or not '_' in filename:
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has a file name that doesn't match our standard.".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
name_lst.append(filename)
self.assertEqual(faulty_rules, [], Fore.RED +
"There are rules with malformed file names (too short, too long, uppercase letters, a minus sign etc.). Please see the file names used in our repository and adjust your file names accordingly. The pattern for a valid file name is '[a-z0-9_]{10,70}\.yml' and it has to contain at least an underline character.")
def test_title(self):
faulty_rules = []
allowed_lowercase_words = [
'the',
'for',
'in',
'with',
'via',
'on',
'to',
'without',
'of',
'through',
'from',
'by',
'as',
'a',
'or',
'at',
'and',
'an',
'over',
'new',
]
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
title = self.get_rule_part(file_path=file, part_name="title")
if not title:
print(Fore.RED + "Rule {} has no field 'title'.".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
continue
elif len(title) > 70:
print(Fore.YELLOW + "Rule {} has a title field with too many characters (>70)".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
if title.startswith("Detects "):
print(Fore.RED + "Rule {} has a title that starts with 'Detects'".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
wrong_casing = []
for word in title.split(" "):
if word.islower() and not word.lower() in allowed_lowercase_words and not "." in word and not "/" in word and not word[0].isdigit():
wrong_casing.append(word)
if len(wrong_casing) > 0:
print(Fore.RED + "Rule {} has a title that has not title capitalization. Words: '{}'".format(file, ", ".join(wrong_casing)))
faulty_rules.append(file)
self.assertEqual(faulty_rules, [], Fore.RED +
"There are rules with non-conform 'title' fields. Please check: https://github.com/SigmaHQ/sigma/wiki/Rule-Creation-Guide#title")
def test_invalid_logsource_attributes(self):
faulty_rules = []
valid_logsource = [
'category',
'product',
'service',
'definition',
]
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
logsource = self.get_rule_part(file_path=file, part_name="logsource")
if not logsource:
print(Fore.RED + "Rule {} has no 'logsource'.".format(file))
faulty_rules.append(file)
continue
valid = True
for key in logsource:
if key.lower() not in valid_logsource:
print(Fore.RED + "Rule {} has a logsource with an invalid field ({})".format(file, key))
valid = False
elif not isinstance(logsource[key],str):
print(Fore.RED + "Rule {} has a logsource with an invalid field type ({})".format(file, key))
valid = False
if not valid:
faulty_rules.append(file)
self.assertEqual(faulty_rules, [], Fore.RED +
"There are rules with non-conform 'logsource' fields. Please check: https://github.com/SigmaHQ/sigma/wiki/Rule-Creation-Guide#log-source")
def test_selection_list_one_value(self):
faulty_rules = []
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
detection = self.get_rule_part(file_path=file, part_name="detection")
if detection:
valid = True
for key in detection:
if isinstance(detection[key],list):
if len(detection[key]) == 1 and not isinstance(detection[key][0],str): #rule with only list of Keywords term
print(Fore.RED + "Rule {} has the selection ({}) with a list of only 1 element in detection".format(file, key))
valid = False
#deactivate because more than 170 rules have to be corrected
# if isinstance(detection[key],dict):
# for sub_key in detection[key]:
# if isinstance(detection[key][sub_key],list): #split in 2 if as get a error "int has not len()"
# if len(detection[key][sub_key]) == 1:
# print (Fore.RED + "Rule {} has the selection ({}/{}) with a list of only 1 value in detection".format(file, key, sub_key))
# #valid = False
if not valid:
faulty_rules.append(file)
self.assertEqual(faulty_rules, [], Fore.RED + "There are rules using list with only 1 element")
def test_condition_operator_casesensitive(self):
faulty_rules = []
for file in self.yield_next_rule_file_path(self.path_to_rules):
detection = self.get_rule_part(file_path=file, part_name="detection")
if detection:
valid = True
if isinstance(detection["condition"],str):
param = detection["condition"].split(' ')
for item in param:
if item.lower() == 'or' and not item == 'or':
valid = False
elif item.lower() == 'and' and not item == 'and':
valid = False
elif item.lower() == 'not' and not item == 'not':
valid = False
elif item.lower() == 'of' and not item == 'of':
valid = False
if not valid:
print(Fore.RED + "Rule {} has a invalid condition '{}' : 'or','and','not','of' are lowercase".format(file,detection["condition"]))
faulty_rules.append(file)
self.assertEqual(faulty_rules, [], Fore.RED + "There are rules using condition whitout lowercase operator")
def get_mitre_data():
"""
Generate tags from live TAXI service to get up-to-date data
"""
# Get ATT&CK information
lift = attack_client()
# Techniques
MITRE_TECHNIQUES = []
MITRE_TECHNIQUE_NAMES = []
MITRE_PHASE_NAMES = set()
MITRE_TOOLS = []
MITRE_GROUPS = []
# Techniques
enterprise_techniques = lift.get_enterprise_techniques()
for t in enterprise_techniques:
MITRE_TECHNIQUE_NAMES.append(t['name'].lower().replace(' ', '_').replace('-', '_'))
for r in t.external_references:
if 'external_id' in r:
MITRE_TECHNIQUES.append(r['external_id'].lower())
if 'kill_chain_phases' in t:
for kc in t['kill_chain_phases']:
if 'phase_name' in kc:
MITRE_PHASE_NAMES.add(kc['phase_name'].replace('-','_'))
# Tools / Malware
enterprise_tools = lift.get_enterprise_tools()
for t in enterprise_tools:
for r in t.external_references:
if 'external_id' in r:
MITRE_TOOLS.append(r['external_id'].lower())
enterprise_malware = lift.get_enterprise_malware()
for m in enterprise_malware:
for r in m.external_references:
if 'external_id' in r:
MITRE_TOOLS.append(r['external_id'].lower())
# Groups
enterprise_groups = lift.get_enterprise_groups()
for g in enterprise_groups:
for r in g.external_references:
if 'external_id' in r:
MITRE_GROUPS.append(r['external_id'].lower())
# Combine all IDs to a big tag list
return ["attack." + item for item in MITRE_TECHNIQUES + MITRE_TECHNIQUE_NAMES + list(MITRE_PHASE_NAMES) + MITRE_GROUPS + MITRE_TOOLS]
if __name__ == "__main__":
init(autoreset=True)
# Get Current Data from MITRE ATT&CK®
MITRE_ALL = get_mitre_data()
# Run the tests
unittest.main()