I am looking into an issue where an invalid association definition on a mapped superclass is not rejected as it should be.
It turns out the assocation is not even reported by the mapping driver, due to the following lines of code.
|
// Evaluate annotations on properties/fields |
|
foreach ($class->getProperties() as $property) { |
|
if ( |
|
$metadata->isMappedSuperclass && ! $property->isPrivate() |
|
|| |
|
$metadata->isInheritedField($property->name) |
|
|| |
|
$metadata->isInheritedAssociation($property->name) |
|
|| |
|
$metadata->isInheritedEmbeddedClass($property->name) |
|
) { |
|
continue; |
|
} |
This is present in the attribute driver as well. To add insult to injury, the thing I am trying to chase depends on wheter an association is mapped in a public or private property.
I have seen this exact piece of code has been questioned in #5744 before, but neither that nor the reference to #4198 help.
Can anybody help reasoning about this – what's the purpose of these continuations, and what does it have to do with private in mapped superclasses?
Maybe it has to do with that the Reflection API also reports non-private properties inherited from base classes, but I don't get it.
How do we want to treat such inherited properties, and/or can we tell whether a property was just inherited or inhertied + redeclared?
I am looking into an issue where an invalid association definition on a mapped superclass is not rejected as it should be.
It turns out the assocation is not even reported by the mapping driver, due to the following lines of code.
orm/lib/Doctrine/ORM/Mapping/Driver/AnnotationDriver.php
Lines 345 to 357 in 69c7791
This is present in the attribute driver as well. To add insult to injury, the thing I am trying to chase depends on wheter an association is mapped in a
publicorprivateproperty.I have seen this exact piece of code has been questioned in #5744 before, but neither that nor the reference to #4198 help.
Can anybody help reasoning about this – what's the purpose of these continuations, and what does it have to do with
privatein mapped superclasses?Maybe it has to do with that the Reflection API also reports non-private properties inherited from base classes, but I don't get it.
How do we want to treat such inherited properties, and/or can we tell whether a property was just inherited or inhertied + redeclared?