Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Exclude armv7 arch from iOS add-to-app integration test hosts #102007

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

jmagman
Copy link
Member

@jmagman jmagman commented Apr 15, 2022

To support removing armv7 iOS arch from the Flutter.framework (flutter/engine#32664), the add-to-app iOS host apps must exclude building that arch.

All existing add-to-apps hosts will need to do this migration manually as well. I will update the samples, and the website with instructions:
Screen Shot 2022-04-15 at 2 08 37 PM

See also #101943

Pre-launch Checklist

  • I read the Contributor Guide and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs.
  • I read the Tree Hygiene wiki page, which explains my responsibilities.
  • I read and followed the Flutter Style Guide, including Features we expect every widget to implement.
  • I signed the CLA.
  • I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above.
  • I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with ///).
  • I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is test-exempt.
  • All existing and new tests are passing.

If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on Discord.

@jmagman jmagman added platform-ios iOS applications specifically a: existing-apps Integration with existing apps via the add-to-app flow labels Apr 15, 2022
@jmagman jmagman self-assigned this Apr 15, 2022
@flutter-dashboard flutter-dashboard bot added the c: contributor-productivity Team-specific productivity, code health, technical debt. label Apr 15, 2022
@flutter-dashboard
Copy link

It looks like this pull request may not have tests. Please make sure to add tests before merging. If you need an exemption to this rule, contact Hixie on the #hackers channel in Chat (don't just cc him here, he won't see it! He's on Discord!).

If you are not sure if you need tests, consider this rule of thumb: the purpose of a test is to make sure someone doesn't accidentally revert the fix. Ask yourself, is there anything in your PR that you feel it is important we not accidentally revert back to how it was before your fix?

Reviewers: Read the Tree Hygiene page and make sure this patch meets those guidelines before LGTMing.

@jmagman
Copy link
Member Author

jmagman commented Apr 15, 2022

Added a test.

if ((await fileType(builtHostBinary)).contains('armv7')) {
throw TaskResult.failure('Unexpected armv7 architecture slice in $builtHostBinary');
}
await containsBitcode(builtHostBinary);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what does this do?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're right, this is a bug. Will fix all the spots in this file.

@jmagman
Copy link
Member Author

jmagman commented Apr 15, 2022

Hmm, the module tests passed in #102012 (flutter/engine#32664) without this change. I'm going to close this and think more about why this wasn't needed. 🤔
Will follow up in another PR to check the containsBitcode result.

@jmagman
Copy link
Member Author

jmagman commented Apr 16, 2022

Will follow up in another PR to check the containsBitcode result.

#102016

@jmagman jmagman deleted the add2app-32-host branch April 16, 2022 01:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
a: existing-apps Integration with existing apps via the add-to-app flow c: contributor-productivity Team-specific productivity, code health, technical debt. platform-ios iOS applications specifically
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants