This issue is in response to issue 88 for the micro framework echo.
First of all echo is about 8x faster than Gin in that benchmark. Second, Gin went from 69373 ns/op to 412886 ns/op, nearly 6 times slower, what happened?
Since performance is one of the main selling points for Gin I think this is worth discussing. I really like Gin but the reason I started using it was because of the performance, I assume this is the case for many others too.
Here are the relevant numbers
| April 1, 2015 |
|
|
|
|
| BenchmarkEcho_GithubAll |
30000 |
42728 ns/op |
0 B/op |
0 allocs/op |
| BenchmarkGin_GithubAll |
20000 |
69373 ns/op |
13792 B/op |
167 allocs/op |
| June 3, 2015 |
|
|
|
|
| BenchmarkEcho_GithubAll |
30000 |
51470 ns/op |
0 B/op |
0 allocs/op |
| BenchmarkGin_GithubAll |
3000 |
412886 ns/op |
0 B/op |
0 allocs/op |
This issue is in response to issue 88 for the micro framework echo.
First of all echo is about 8x faster than Gin in that benchmark. Second, Gin went from 69373 ns/op to 412886 ns/op, nearly 6 times slower, what happened?
Since performance is one of the main selling points for Gin I think this is worth discussing. I really like Gin but the reason I started using it was because of the performance, I assume this is the case for many others too.
Here are the relevant numbers