Commit da00bf9
committed
Swift: move TBD code to ql
This allows to avoid bypassing label type correcness in the extractor,
and allows to independently resolve TBD extractions, as with this
approach TBD nodes do have the correctly typed trap label. The TBD
status is now a predicate on the QL side.
This requires:
* a default visit using the correct type, which is achieved via macro
metaprogramming in `VisitorBase.h`, following the way
`swift::ASTVisitor` is programmed
* a mapping from labels to corresponding binding trap entries. The
functor is defined in `TrapTagTraits.h` and instantiated in generated
`TrapEntries.h`
* Binding trap entries for TBD unknown entities must not have any other
field than the `id` (after all, we are supposed to not extract them
yet). This is why all unextracted fields in `schema.yml` have been
commented out, and will be uncommentend when visitors are added1 parent 20af134 commit da00bf9
178 files changed
Lines changed: 928 additions & 2146 deletions
File tree
- swift
- codegen
- templates
- extractor
- trap
- visitors
- ql
- lib
- codeql/swift
- elements
- typerepr
- type
- generated
- decl
- expr
- pattern
- stmt
- typerepr
- type
- test/extractor-tests/declarations
Some content is hidden
Large Commits have some content hidden by default. Use the searchbox below for content that may be hidden.
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
27 | 27 | | |
28 | 28 | | |
29 | 29 | | |
30 | | - | |
| 30 | + | |
| 31 | + | |
| 32 | + | |
| 33 | + | |
31 | 34 | | |
32 | 35 | | |
33 | 36 | | |
| |||
38 | 41 | | |
39 | 42 | | |
40 | 43 | | |
41 | | - | |
| 44 | + | |
| 45 | + | |
| 46 | + | |
| 47 | + | |
| 48 | + | |
42 | 49 | | |
43 | 50 | | |
44 | 51 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments