Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@jerop
Copy link
Contributor

@jerop jerop commented Sep 18, 2025

Adds a security warning to all Gemini CLI workflow prompts, instructing the model to avoid using command substitution features like $(...), <(...), or >(...) in shell commands.

This is a preventative measure to avoid errors where the Gemini CLI rejects commands that use command substitution for security reasons. This change makes the security constraints of the tool explicit to the model.

Adds a security warning to all Gemini CLI workflow prompts, instructing the model to avoid using command substitution features like `$(...)`, `<(...)`, or `>(...)` in shell commands.

This is a preventative measure to avoid errors where the Gemini CLI rejects commands that use command substitution for security reasons. This change makes the security constraints of the tool explicit to the model.
@gemini-cli
Copy link

gemini-cli bot commented Sep 18, 2025

🤖 Hi @jerop, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details.

@gemini-cli
Copy link

gemini-cli bot commented Sep 18, 2025

🤖 I'm sorry @jerop, but I was unable to process your request. Please see the logs for more details.

@gemini-cli
Copy link

gemini-cli bot commented Sep 18, 2025

🤖 Hi @jerop, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details.

Copy link

@gemini-cli gemini-cli bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

📋 Review Summary

This pull request enhances security by explicitly instructing the model to avoid command substitution in shell commands. The change is applied consistently across all relevant workflow files. The overall quality of the change is good.

🔍 General Feedback

  • The security warning is a good preventative measure and is well-articulated.
  • The change is consistently applied across all relevant files.
  • There is a minor stylistic inconsistency in the formatting of the new rule across different files (e.g., numbered lists, bullet points, and <rule> tags). While this doesn't affect the functionality, you might consider unifying the style in a future refactoring for better maintainability.

@jerop jerop linked an issue Sep 18, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@jerop jerop merged commit 65211e7 into main Sep 18, 2025
64 of 65 checks passed
@jerop jerop deleted the feat/add-security-warning-to-workflows branch September 18, 2025 21:05
google-github-actions-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2025
## What's Changed
* chore: script to generate examples by @leehagoodjames in
#244
* chore: update readme to state user must copy gemini-dispatch.yml by
@leehagoodjames in
#249
* Relax node requirement and bump actions-utils by @sethvargo in
#253
* feat: support /fix slash command and workflow by @leehagoodjames in
#190
* feat(docs): improve manual setup instructions for workflows by @jerop
in #263
* feat: improve action input descriptions by @jerop in
#264
* fix: enforce COMMENT event type for submit_pending_pull_request_review
by @jerop in
#271
* docs: add fork support documentation for PR review workflow by @jerop
in #268
* feat(action): add support for preview and nightly versions by @jerop
in #281
* feat(workflows): add gemini_cli_version to all workflows by @jerop in
#279
* feat: migrate to new Gemini CLI configuration format by @jerop in
#284
* feat: clean up temp fix for empty API key by @jerop in
#285
* Sort inputs alphabetically in action.yml by @jerop in
#286
* chore: organize workflow inputs alphabetically and add missing
parameters by @jerop in
#288
* feat: add auth input validation by @jerop in
#289
* fix(action): correct quoting in workflow expressions by @jerop in
#293
* fix(validation): improve validation error messages by @jerop in
#297
* fix(validate-inputs): surface errors in logs, annotation, and step
summary by @jerop in
#299
* feat(validate-inputs): downgrade validation failures to warnings by
@jerop in
#300
* fix(validate-inputs): use env-based bash shebang for portability by
@jerop in
#303
* feat: simplify input validation logic by @jerop in
#304
* fix(action): correct input validation script behavior by @jerop in
#309
* feat: add command substitution security warning by @jerop in
#306
* fix(triage): correct duplicate step numbering in workflow by @aladh in
#331
* feat: Optionally install extensions by @CallumHYoung in
#329
* docs(extensions): add documentation for extensions by @jerop in
#340
* chore(workflows): Apply formatting and fix example prompt by @jerop in
#339
* refactor(workflows): improve prompts to use env vars directly by
@jerop in
#342
* fix(review): Remove --source argument to match CLI 8.0 release by
@CallumHYoung in
#347

## New Contributors
* @aladh made their first contribution in
#331
* @CallumHYoung made their first contribution in
#329

**Full Changelog**:
v0.1.12...v0.1.13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Command substitution using $(), <(), or >() is not allowed

3 participants