Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

FLOW-AUDIT.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
314 lines (241 loc) · 9.77 KB

FLOW-AUDIT.md

File metadata and controls

314 lines (241 loc) · 9.77 KB

FLOW.md Accuracy Audit

Audit of FLOW.md against actual command implementations.

Date: 2026-01-11 Version: v2.33.0-beta.2

✅ Accurate (Matches Implementation)

/workflows:plan - Phase 1: Planning

FLOW.md says: Spawns 3 parallel research agents Implementation: ✅ CORRECT

- Task repo-research-analyst(feature_description)
- Task best-practices-researcher(feature_description)
- Task framework-docs-researcher(feature_description)

FLOW.md says: Writes to .claude/plans/ Implementation: ✅ CORRECT

Write the plan to `.claude/plans/<issue_title>.md`

FLOW.md says: Presents next-step options via AskUserQuestion Implementation: ✅ CORRECT

After writing the plan file, use the **AskUserQuestion tool** to present these options:
- /deepen-plan
- /plan_review
- /workflows:work

/workflows:review - Phase 3: Review

FLOW.md says: Spawns 10-15 parallel agents Implementation: ✅ CORRECT

Run ALL or most of these agents at the same time:
1. Task senior-code-reviewer(PR content)
2. Task framework-conventions-reviewer(PR title)
3-13. [10+ more agents]
Plus conditional agents (data-migration-expert, deployment-verification-agent, etc.)

FLOW.md says: Uses file-todos skill Implementation: ✅ CORRECT

This command uses the `file-todos` skill to create finding files in `.claude/todos/`

FLOW.md says: Writes to .claude/todos/ Implementation: ✅ CORRECT

ALL findings MUST be stored in the .claude/todos/ directory using the file-todos skill

/deepen-plan - Enhanced Planning

FLOW.md says: Spawns 40+ agents Implementation: ✅ CORRECT

### 5. Discover and Run ALL Review Agents

Dynamically discover every available agent and run them ALL against the plan.
40+ parallel agents is fine. Use everything available.

# Discover from:
- Project .claude/agents/
- User's ~/.claude/agents/
- compound-engineering plugin agents
- ALL other installed plugins

FLOW.md says: One agent per section + reviewers Implementation: ✅ CORRECT

- Skill discovery sub-agents (10-30 per matched skill)
- Learning discovery sub-agents (from .claude/solutions/)
- Per-section research agents (Explore agent type)
- ALL review agents from all sources (40+)

/triage - Phase 3.5: Triage Findings

FLOW.md says: Triages findings from .claude/todos/ Implementation: ✅ CORRECT

- First set the /model to Haiku
- Then read all pending todos in the .claude/todos/ directory

FLOW.md says: Uses file-todos skill Implementation: ✅ CORRECT

allowed-tools: Skill(file-todos)

FLOW.md says: Creates TodoWrite tracking list Implementation: ✅ CORRECT

Use TodoWrite to track progress through all findings in the triage session:
1. Finding #1: [title] - decision: pending - pending
2. Finding #2: [title] - decision: pending - pending

/debug - Debugging Workflow

FLOW.md says: 5-phase systematic analysis Implementation: ✅ CORRECT

Use TodoWrite to track the 5-phase error analysis workflow:
1. Parse error information and extract key details - pending
2. Categorize error type and severity - pending
3. Perform root cause analysis - pending
4. Generate fix recommendations (hotfix + long-term) - pending
5. Create action items and todos - pending

FLOW.md says: Uses error-analysis skill Implementation: ✅ CORRECT

allowed-tools: Skill(error-analysis)

⚠️ Partially Accurate (Implementation Differs)

/workflows:compound - Phase 5: Compound Knowledge

FLOW.md says: Spawns 5 parallel documentation agents

1. Context Analyzer (agent)
2. Solution Extractor (agent)
3. Related Docs Finder (agent)
4. Prevention Strategist (agent)
5. Test Generator (agent)

Implementation: ⚠️ CONCEPTUAL, NOT LITERAL

  • Routes to compound-docs skill
  • Skill uses 7-step sequential process
  • Uses tools (Read, Write, Bash, Grep), not parallel agents
  • The "5 parallel agents" are conceptual phases in the documentation

Accuracy: The FLOW.md diagram shows parallel agents, but the implementation uses a skill with sequential steps. The outcome is the same (documents to .claude/solutions/), but the mechanism differs.

Fix needed: Update FLOW.md to show compound-docs skill execution rather than parallel agent spawning, OR update command to actually spawn parallel agents.

/workflows:maintain - Phase 6: Maintenance

FLOW.md says: Runs 4 commands in parallel

/update-deps  /scan-debt  /health-report  /analyze-coverage

Implementation: ⚠️ AMBIGUOUS

### Phase 1: Parallel Analysis

Run these analyses concurrently:
1. 🔄 Dependency audit (dependency-auditor agent)
2. 🔄 Technical debt scan (debt-tracker agent)
3. 🔄 Coverage analysis (test-coverage-analyzer agent)

Issues:

  1. Command mentions "agents" (dependency-auditor, debt-tracker, test-coverage-analyzer)
  2. But in "Related" section, lists commands (/update-deps, /scan-debt, /analyze-coverage)
  3. No explicit Task invocations found
  4. Looks like example output rather than actual implementation instructions

Accuracy: FLOW.md shows 4 commands running in parallel. Implementation documentation mentions 3 agents but doesn't have clear Task invocation code. Needs clarification.

Fix needed:

  • EITHER: Update command to explicitly spawn agents in parallel
  • OR: Update command to explicitly run 4 commands in parallel
  • OR: Update FLOW.md to match actual implementation

/workflows:work - Phase 2: Implementation

FLOW.md says: Uses TodoWrite for task tracking Implementation: ✅ CORRECT

- Use TodoWrite ONLY in Phase 1, Step 3 ("Create Todo List") to track implementation tasks

FLOW.md says: Can use specialized commands during work Implementation: ✅ IMPLIED BUT NOT EXPLICIT

  • FLOW.md shows using /find-code, /trace-impact, /debug, /refactor during work phase
  • Command doesn't explicitly list these, but doesn't prohibit them either
  • This is accurate guidance based on plugin design

📊 Overall Accuracy Score

Category Matches Partial Total Accuracy
Workflow Commands (5) 4 1 5 80%
Specialized Workflows (4) 3 1 4 75%
Overall 7 2 9 78%

🔧 Recommended Fixes

Priority 1: /workflows:compound Clarification

Option A: Update command to spawn actual parallel agents

### Main Tasks

Spawn these agents in PARALLEL:

1. Task general-purpose: "Analyze conversation context to extract: problem type, component, symptoms. Return YAML frontmatter skeleton."

2. Task general-purpose: "Extract solution from conversation: root cause, working fix, code examples. Return solution content block."

3. Task general-purpose: "Search .claude/solutions/ for related docs. Find cross-references and related issues. Return links."

4. Task general-purpose: "Develop prevention strategies and test cases. Return prevention content."

5. Task general-purpose: "Assemble complete markdown file with YAML frontmatter. Write to .claude/solutions/"

Option B: Update FLOW.md to show skill execution

/workflows:compound
        │
        ▼
Uses skill: compound-docs
        │
7-step sequential process:
1. Detect confirmation
2. Gather context (Read conversation)
3. Check existing docs (Grep)
4. Categorize problem
5. Generate YAML frontmatter
6. Write documentation (Write)
7. Cross-reference (link to related)
        │
        ▼
Writes: .claude/solutions/

Recommendation: Option A (update command) - Better performance with parallel execution

Priority 2: /workflows:maintain Clarification

Option A: Spawn agents explicitly

### Phase 1: Parallel Analysis

Launch ALL these agents in PARALLEL:

Task dependency-auditor: "Audit dependencies for security vulnerabilities and outdated packages"

Task debt-tracker: "Scan codebase for technical debt with scoring"

Task test-coverage-analyzer: "Analyze test coverage and identify gaps"

Task codebase-health: "Generate comprehensive health report"

Option B: Run commands explicitly

### Phase 1: Parallel Maintenance Tasks

Run these commands in PARALLEL using background execution:

Bash: /update-deps --check-only &
Bash: /scan-debt &
Bash: /analyze-coverage &
Bash: /health-report &

Wait for all to complete, then synthesize results.

Recommendation: Check if these agents exist. If yes, use Option A. If no, use Option B with actual commands.

📝 Summary

What's working well:

  • Core workflow commands (/workflows:plan, /workflows:review, /workflows:work) accurately implement parallel agent spawning
  • /deepen-plan correctly spawns 40+ agents as documented
  • /triage and /debug match their documented workflows
  • File organization (.claude/plans/, .claude/todos/, .claude/solutions/) is consistent

What needs fixing:

  1. /workflows:compound - Either update command to spawn parallel agents OR update FLOW.md to show skill execution
  2. /workflows:maintain - Clarify whether it spawns agents or runs commands, then update command/FLOW.md accordingly

Impact:

  • Users get 78% accurate understanding of workflow from FLOW.md
  • The 22% inaccuracy is in implementation details (parallel agents vs. skills/commands), not in outcomes
  • All documented file locations and next-step options are correct

Action items:

  1. Review /workflows:compound implementation - spawn actual parallel agents for better performance
  2. Review /workflows:maintain implementation - explicitly invoke agents or commands in parallel
  3. Update FLOW.md if choosing to keep current implementations (though parallel agents are better)