1. We used the nmrglue 3D data processing script to process a 3D full-sampled bruker data, but the processing results are quite different from those processed by NMRPipe. The results are as follows, where a, b, and c are the results of NMRPipe processing, and d, e, and f are nmrglue processes the results.
a: 
b:  **c:** 
d: 
e: 
f: 
At the same time, we use NMRPipe to process the direct dimension of the 3D data, and then use nmrglue to process the two indirect dimensions of the 3D data and find that the results are consistent with the NMRPipe results. So we think the problem should lie in the processing of the direct dimension.
2.Also, it seems that nmrglue's bruker and varian also have problems reading raw data. It is normal when we use bruker and varian to read 3D fully sampled raw data, but when we use bruker and varian to read 3D undersampled raw data, the read data becomes 2D data.
We hope the author can provide some help, it is greatly appreciated!
a:
 **c:** 
b:
d:
e:
f:
At the same time, we use NMRPipe to process the direct dimension of the 3D data, and then use nmrglue to process the two indirect dimensions of the 3D data and find that the results are consistent with the NMRPipe results. So we think the problem should lie in the processing of the direct dimension.
2.Also, it seems that nmrglue's bruker and varian also have problems reading raw data. It is normal when we use bruker and varian to read 3D fully sampled raw data, but when we use bruker and varian to read 3D undersampled raw data, the read data becomes 2D data.
We hope the author can provide some help, it is greatly appreciated!