rfc0016: replace some leftover "kv"

rjbs · rjbs · commit 53e7246f67c6 · 2022-02-19T14:42:07.000-05:00
diff --git a/rfc0016.md b/rfc0016.md
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ for my ($i, $value) ($alpha->{beta}->[0]->%[ keys $alpha->{beta}->[0]->@* ]) {
 
 This is pretty bad.
 
-With `kv`, we write this:
+With `indexed`, we write this:
 
 ```perl
 for my ($i, $value) (indexed $alpha->{beta}->[0]->@*) {
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ just like `keys` or `values`.  This is useless, and issues a warning in the new
 
 In void context, the `Useless use of %s in void context` warning is issued.
 
-In list context, `kv LIST` evalutes to a list twice the size of the array,
+In list context, `indexed LIST` evalutes to a list twice the size of the array,
 meshing the values with a list of integers starting from zero.  All values are
 copies, unlike `values ARRAY`.  (If your LIST was actually an array, you can
 use the index to modify the array that way!)
@@ -88,9 +88,9 @@ Nothing specific predicted.
 
 (See the examples under **Rationale**.)
 
-I expect that docs for `keys` and `values` will be updated to reference `kv` as
-well, and we'll add a note about it to the documentation on `for` and possibly
-pair slices.
+I expect that docs for `keys` and `values` will be updated to reference
+`indexed` as well, and we'll add a note about it to the documentation on `for`
+and possibly pair slices.
 
 When n-at-a-time foreach is no longer experimental, we should refer to the
 combination of `for my (...) (...)` with `indexed` as forming an alternative to
