Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Fix race condition: This change wraps the initial verification in a G…#137327

Draft
ndixita wants to merge 1 commit intokubernetes:masterfrom
ndixita:testfix
Draft

Fix race condition: This change wraps the initial verification in a G…#137327
ndixita wants to merge 1 commit intokubernetes:masterfrom
ndixita:testfix

Conversation

@ndixita
Copy link
Contributor

@ndixita ndixita commented Mar 1, 2026

…omega Eventually block and ensures the pod object is refreshed from the API server within each retry loop

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR is related to:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?


Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 1, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 1, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/test sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. labels Mar 1, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label Mar 1, 2026
@ndixita
Copy link
Contributor Author

ndixita commented Mar 1, 2026

/test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-alpha-features

1 similar comment
@ndixita
Copy link
Contributor Author

ndixita commented Mar 1, 2026

/test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-alpha-features

@ndixita
Copy link
Contributor Author

ndixita commented Mar 1, 2026

/test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-alpha-features

@ndixita
Copy link
Contributor Author

ndixita commented Mar 1, 2026

/retest

@ndixita
Copy link
Contributor Author

ndixita commented Mar 2, 2026

/test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-inplace-pod-level-resources-resize

2 similar comments
@ndixita
Copy link
Contributor Author

ndixita commented Mar 2, 2026

/test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-inplace-pod-level-resources-resize

@ndixita
Copy link
Contributor Author

ndixita commented Mar 2, 2026

/test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-inplace-pod-level-resources-resize

@ndixita
Copy link
Contributor Author

ndixita commented Mar 2, 2026

/test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-alpha-features

@ndixita
Copy link
Contributor Author

ndixita commented Mar 2, 2026

/test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-inplace-pod-level-resources-resize

1 similar comment
@ndixita
Copy link
Contributor Author

ndixita commented Mar 2, 2026

/test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-inplace-pod-level-resources-resize

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 2, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ndixita
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign yujuhong for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ndixita
Copy link
Contributor Author

ndixita commented Mar 2, 2026

/test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-inplace-pod-level-resources-resize

@ndixita
Copy link
Contributor Author

ndixita commented Mar 2, 2026

/test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-inplace-pod-level-resources-resize

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 2, 2026
@ndixita
Copy link
Contributor Author

ndixita commented Mar 2, 2026

/test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-inplace-pod-level-resources-resize

@ndixita
Copy link
Contributor Author

ndixita commented Mar 2, 2026

/test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-inplace-pod-level-resources-resize

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ndixita: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-kubernetes-linter-hints d62a84c link false /test pull-kubernetes-linter-hints
pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-alpha-features d62a84c link false /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-alpha-features
pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-inplace-pod-level-resources-resize e31aeee link false /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-inplace-pod-level-resources-resize

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

…omega Eventually block and ensures the pod object is refreshed from the API server within each retry loop
@ndixita
Copy link
Contributor Author

ndixita commented Mar 3, 2026

/test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-inplace-pod-level-resources-resize

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/kubelet area/test cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants