Commit f669b9c
authored
[lldb][test] Test all libcxxabi demangler test-cases against TrackingOutputBuffer (#137793)
To test the infrastructure added in
#131836 in would be nice to
confirm that we can reconstruct all kinds of demangled names. The
libcxxabi test-suite already has all those test-cases.
This patch copies those test-cases (taken from
`libcxxabi/test/test_demangle.pass.cpp`), reconstructs the name like
LLDB would when showing backtraces, and confirms that all demangled
names can be fully reconstructed.
Two open questions:
1. Do we really want a copy of all those test-cases in LLDB? It's
unlikely to be kept in sync with the demangler test-suite. It includes
30,000+ test-cases
2. Do we want to turn the
`GetDemangledBasename`/`GetDemangledScope`/etc. into public APIs (e.g.,
on `TrackingOutputBuffer`) so that we can use the exact same method of
extraction in the tests?1 parent c0b25f4 commit f669b9c
1 file changed
+63
-0
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
612 | 612 | | |
613 | 613 | | |
614 | 614 | | |
| 615 | + | |
| 616 | + | |
| 617 | + | |
| 618 | + | |
| 619 | + | |
| 620 | + | |
| 621 | + | |
| 622 | + | |
| 623 | + | |
| 624 | + | |
| 625 | + | |
| 626 | + | |
| 627 | + | |
| 628 | + | |
| 629 | + | |
| 630 | + | |
| 631 | + | |
| 632 | + | |
| 633 | + | |
| 634 | + | |
| 635 | + | |
| 636 | + | |
| 637 | + | |
| 638 | + | |
| 639 | + | |
| 640 | + | |
| 641 | + | |
| 642 | + | |
| 643 | + | |
| 644 | + | |
| 645 | + | |
| 646 | + | |
| 647 | + | |
| 648 | + | |
| 649 | + | |
| 650 | + | |
| 651 | + | |
| 652 | + | |
| 653 | + | |
| 654 | + | |
| 655 | + | |
| 656 | + | |
| 657 | + | |
| 658 | + | |
| 659 | + | |
| 660 | + | |
| 661 | + | |
| 662 | + | |
| 663 | + | |
| 664 | + | |
| 665 | + | |
| 666 | + | |
| 667 | + | |
| 668 | + | |
| 669 | + | |
| 670 | + | |
| 671 | + | |
| 672 | + | |
| 673 | + | |
| 674 | + | |
| 675 | + | |
| 676 | + | |
| 677 | + | |
0 commit comments