DOC: Fix Sphinx warning and address reviewer comments

tinezivic · tinezivic · commit 016175145d19 · 2026-04-21T18:23:23.000+02:00
- Fix backticks on autolim=True in add_collection docstring
  (single backtick was interpreted as cross-reference by Sphinx)
- 'explicit calls' -&gt; 'explicit call' per reviewer suggestion
- Remove out-of-place TODO comments from artist.py remove()
diff --git a/lib/matplotlib/artist.py b/lib/matplotlib/artist.py
@@ -268,11 +268,6 @@ def remove(self):
 
         else:
             raise NotImplementedError('cannot remove artist')
-        # TODO: move the limits calculation into the artist itself, including
-        # the property of whether or not the artist should affect the limits.
-        # Then there will be no distinction between axes.add_line,
-        # axes.add_patch, etc.
-        # TODO: add legend support
 
     def have_units(self):
         """Return whether units are set on any axis."""
diff --git a/lib/matplotlib/axes/_base.py b/lib/matplotlib/axes/_base.py
@@ -2391,15 +2391,15 @@ def add_collection(self, collection, autolim=True):
 
             .. versionchanged:: 3.11
 
-               Since 3.11 `autolim=True` matches the standard behavior
+               Since 3.11 ``autolim=True`` matches the standard behavior
                of other ``add_[artist]`` methods: Axes data and view limits
                are both updated in the method, and the collection will
                be considered in future data limit updates through
                `.relim`.
 
                Prior to matplotlib 3.11 this was only a one-time update
                of the data limits. Updating view limits required an
-               explicit calls to `~.Axes.autoscale_view`, and collections
+               explicit call to `~.Axes.autoscale_view`, and collections
                did not take part in `.relim`.
 
             As an implementation detail, the value "_datalim_only" is
