Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Commit cee750e

Browse files
committed
Incorporate comments from Eric Firing regarding usage of pyplot versus pylab.
1 parent fdc7c89 commit cee750e

1 file changed

Lines changed: 4 additions & 4 deletions

File tree

doc/faq/usage_faq.rst

Lines changed: 4 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -77,10 +77,10 @@ For example, one can call the `sin` and `cos` functions just like
7777
you could in MATLAB, as well as having all the features of pyplot.
7878

7979
The pyplot interface is generally preferred for non-interactive plotting
80-
(i.e., scripting). The pylab interface is generally preferred for interactive
81-
plotting in the python shell. Note that this is what you get if you use the
82-
*ipython* shell with the *-pylab* option, which imports everything
83-
from pylab and makes plotting fully interactive.
80+
(i.e., scripting). The pylab interface is convenient for interactive
81+
calculations and plotting, as it minimizes typing. Note that this is
82+
what you get if you use the *ipython* shell with the *-pylab* option,
83+
which imports everything from pylab and makes plotting fully interactive.
8484

8585
.. _coding_styles:
8686

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)