You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A long time ago, our LGTM Check used to work with the C/C++ code, but it stopped doing so. Currently, this is because it runs setup.py using Python 2 and we have Python 3.6 syntax in it. We should be able to configure it to not use Python 2 easily.
However, prior to that, it failed because it could not download jQuery. I am working towards removing that requirement entirely, but this is something we should keep in mind if more things are downloaded (e.g., #16720).
And before anyone asks about the utility of LGTM, yes it's not blocking and full of many false positives, but I did go through it once and find several real bugs (e.g., #16802.) And since C/C++ is probably the language with least proficiency on the team, more eyes on it would be better.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue has been marked "inactive" because it has been 365 days since the last comment. If this issue is still present in recent Matplotlib releases, or the feature request is still wanted, please leave a comment and this label will be removed. If there are no updates in another 30 days, this issue will be automatically closed, but you are free to re-open or create a new issue if needed. We value issue reports, and this procedure is meant to help us resurface and prioritize issues that have not been addressed yet, not make them disappear. Thanks for your help!
A long time ago, our LGTM Check used to work with the C/C++ code, but it stopped doing so. Currently, this is because it runs
setup.py
using Python 2 and we have Python 3.6 syntax in it. We should be able to configure it to not use Python 2 easily.However, prior to that, it failed because it could not download jQuery. I am working towards removing that requirement entirely, but this is something we should keep in mind if more things are downloaded (e.g., #16720).
And before anyone asks about the utility of LGTM, yes it's not blocking and full of many false positives, but I did go through it once and find several real bugs (e.g., #16802.) And since C/C++ is probably the language with least proficiency on the team, more eyes on it would be better.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: