You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Looking at #25796 and #26854, it might be helpful to be able to independently set the different parts of sketch and not just as a tuple. This is motivated by wanting to make plt.xkcd discouraged and wanting the cleanest alternative for passing in the sketch params.
and if we're OK w/ the other parameters getting their own rcParams then they can have a unified naming scheme. Alternatively, we can probably do the parsing so None = default but I don't like having to remember which position is which param.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Consensus on the call is we won't, I think we should b/c I think all the styling functionality should just live together & it's odd to have this one special cased styling function.
Problem
Looking at #25796 and #26854, it might be helpful to be able to independently set the different parts of sketch and not just as a tuple. This is motivated by wanting to make
plt.xkcd
discouraged and wanting the cleanest alternative for passing in the sketch params.Proposed solution
#25796 moves in this direction by allowing both
and if we're OK w/ the other parameters getting their own rcParams then they can have a unified naming scheme. Alternatively, we can probably do the parsing so
None = default
but I don't like having to remember which position is which param.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: