Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

[Bug]: LaTeX X-Tick Labels are Vertically Misaligned When DPI is Set #31802

Description

@mikewacker

Bug summary

x-tick labels using LaTeX are vertically misaligned when you call savefig() with dpi=300. The misalignment occurs when two labels have a superscript and subscript, while the third misaligned label only has a superscript.

Code for reproduction

import sys

import matplotlib
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

print(matplotlib.__version__)
print(matplotlib.get_backend())
print(sys.version)

idxs = list(range(3))
labels = ["$w^{(2)}_1$", "$w^{(2)}_2$", "$b^{(2)}$"]

fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(3, 3))
ax.set_xlim(-0.5, 2.5)
ax.set_ylim(-3, 3)
ax.set_xticks(idxs, labels)
ax.set_yticks([])
ax.tick_params(which="both", length=0)
fig.tight_layout()
fig.savefig("test.png", dpi=300)

Actual outcome

Here is the image produced by the code. You can see that the $b^{(2)}$ label is vertically misaligned; it's higher than the other two labels.

Image

Expected outcome

Here is the same image if you run the code without the dpi arg in savefig(). You can see that the $b^{(2)}$ label is vertically aligned with the other two labels.

Image

Additional information

[EDIT: slight fix to code] Here's the reproduction code modified to use a workaround:

import sys

import matplotlib
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from matplotlib.artist import Artist
from matplotlib.figure import Figure

print(matplotlib.__version__)
print(matplotlib.get_backend())
print(sys.version)


def get_center(fig: Figure, artist: Artist) -> tuple[float, float]:
    renderer = fig.canvas.get_renderer()  # type: ignore  # get_renderer() not in base class
    bbox = artist.get_window_extent(renderer)
    fig_box = bbox.transformed(fig.transFigure.inverted())
    x = (fig_box.xmin + fig_box.xmax) / 2
    y = (fig_box.ymin + fig_box.ymax) / 2
    return x, y


idxs = list(range(3))
labels = ["$w^{(2)}_1$", "$w^{(2)}_2$", "$b^{(2)}_1$"]  # add subscript to b2

fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(3, 3))
ax.set_xlim(-0.5, 2.5)
ax.set_ylim(-3, 3)
ax.set_xticks(idxs, labels)
ax.set_yticks([])
ax.tick_params(which="both", length=0)
fig.tight_layout()  # call the layout function before fixing the label

orig_b2_label = ax.get_xticklabels()[-1]
orig_b2_x, orig_b2_y = get_center(fig, orig_b2_label)  # measure while it's still visible
orig_b2_label.set_visible(False)
b2_label = fig.text(
    orig_b2_x, orig_b2_y, "$b^{(2)}$", ha="center", va="center", transform=fig.transFigure
)
b2_label.set_in_layout(False)

fig.savefig("test-workaround.png", dpi=300)

Here is the image with the workaround:

Image

(Feel free to let me know if there is a better workaround.)

Operating system

Ubuntu 24

Matplotlib Version

3.10.9

Matplotlib Backend

module://backend_interagg

Python version

Python 3.12.3

Jupyter version

No response

Installation

uv

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions