From b8074817a9170b73236bba9765a2e7c88d9317d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Antony Lee Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 22:57:35 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Reword awkward sentence in FAQ. Note the double occurrence of "check" in the previous version. --- doc/users/faq/howto_faq.rst | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/users/faq/howto_faq.rst b/doc/users/faq/howto_faq.rst index 4ea220d969b0..fd4e81f32d00 100644 --- a/doc/users/faq/howto_faq.rst +++ b/doc/users/faq/howto_faq.rst @@ -89,8 +89,8 @@ way of defining empty, and checking the above is only rarely necessary. Usually the user or program handling the figure know if they have added something to the figure. -Checking whether a figure would render empty cannot be reliably checked except -by actually rendering the figure and investigating the rendered result. +The only reliable way to check whether a figure would render empty is to +actually perform such a rendering and inspect the result. .. _howto-findobj: