[RFC] Deterministic Runtime Safety & SMT Invariant Verification for AutoGen via Microsoft Z3 #8218
Leonid-3smx
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[RFC] Deterministic Runtime Safety & SMT Invariant Verification for AutoGen via Microsoft Z3
microsoft/autogen(GitHub Discussions)1. Summary
We propose introducing a Deterministic SMT-Based Runtime Guard for Microsoft AutoGen using the Microsoft Z3 Theorem Prover.
While existing agent guardrails rely on semantic prompt checks (which remain vulnerable to jailbreaks, instruction drift, and high latency), our proposed middleware provides formal mathematical verification of state invariants (e.g. token/budget limits, non-destructive execution, and non-dominated action choices) in under 3 milliseconds before any tool call reaches the execution environment.
A working, open-source reference implementation with 100% test coverage is available at https://github.com/Leonid-3smx/Radiant-Guard.
2. Motivation: Operational Failure Modes in Production AutoGen Swarms
As AutoGen deployments scale in production (CI/CD pipelines, autonomous data analysis, coding assistants), enterprise users face three critical failure modes:
Agents entering iterative ping-pong loops (e.g., AssistantAgent <-> UserProxyAgent) can exhaust corporate API budgets within hours. Current termination conditions rely on string checks (e.g.,
"TERMINATE"), which LLMs frequently forget to generate.When code execution is enabled, an agent misled by an external prompt injection (e.g., in a scraped webpage or git issue) can execute irreversible shell commands (
rm -rf, DROP DATABASE, data exfiltration).Regulated industries cannot accept probabilistic prompt assurances. They require deterministic proof certificates for automated actions.
3. Technical Architecture
The integration introduces an
AutoZ3Guardmiddleware between AutoGen's agent decision stage and theCodeExecutor/ToolExecutor:Key Mathematical Guarantees:
4. Proposed AutoGen Integration Example
We propose a seamless, backward-compatible API integration:
5. Empirical Benchmark Data
We benchmarked the Z3 proof engine and AST scanner on multi-agent transitions:
z3-solver.6. Synergies with Microsoft Technologies
z3-solverPyPI package) as the verification backbone.cgroups v2(on Linux Azure containers) to enforce 512MB RAM caps and terminate descendant processes on parent exit (JOB_OBJECT_LIMIT_KILL_ON_JOB_CLOSE).7. Next Steps & Invitation for Feedback
We would love to get feedback from the AutoGen maintainers and community:
autogen-ext-z3guard) or core middleware?The full working implementation, unit tests, and mathematical proofs are available in our repository:
π https://github.com/Leonid-3smx/Radiant-Guard
All reactions