Replies: 3 comments 3 replies
-
|
Personally no, more likely to use this app to see what is happening on an existing broker rather than using it as the broker for some reason. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Great, thanks |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
If I understand correctly you're talking about configuring, deploying and tearing-down MQTT brokers through an the MQTT Viewer interface, this would be an excellent candidate for a premium cloud service. Also, the ability to perform those action via the MQTT protocol might be the type of killer feature you're looking for. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It would be limited to just a broker running over localhost for dev purposes. I don't have the bandwidth to build interfaces to other hosting providers yet for remote management of brokers, although it would be neat if MQTT Viewer eventually became the tool for monitoring, managing and debugging. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I also use MQTTexplorer to monitor my main broker (which is always running in my network). So, this is not a priority functionality for me. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It seems like this is not a priority for most people. Thanks @SensorsIot. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
For those that don't want to deal with mosquitto / docker / other brokers' complexity when setting up a local broker, there's the possibility of managing this instead through MQTT Viewer's UI.
Would this be useful to you?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions