Yes, this'd be great! Agree that this is an Explanation

Just a quick addition: some of the proposed material is also covered in NumPy Internals in the reference guide. This material is pretty dense so I definitely agree that a distillation to a NEP44-style Explanation with a more user-centric theme would be very nice. I mention it here so that it can be drawn upon (and hopefully kept somewhat synced with) if/when anyone undertakes the Explanation doc.

@melissawm @rgommers , I have tried to analyse it , this issue can be resolved if there is an FAQs section in the documentation , where we'll give a brief eplanation to the questions like these along with the ones which can be sourced from Stack overflow , these type of questions which may sound trivial or basic can sometime be a lot of pain in the workflow for even an experienced developer ,if we look upon this link we'll see that issues of this type are widespread , I'll try to structure a FAQs demo page where questions of such nature can be documented so that we can resolve issues like this which may occur in future too

Hi @mrityagi , I don't think we have considered a FAQ format for this, initially we thought about an "Explanation" document. However, I do think that the questions might be a good guide into which content to cover, and this might end up being an excellent guide to the internals of NumPy. How does that sound to you?

@melissawm yeah I think Explanation/Questions sounds more reliable and a more trustworthy word for NumPy , infact we are on the same page with thought process to structure docs like an excellent guide to internals of NumPy . I have tried to give it a structure which can be useful for such issues . Infact I totally agree with you , the need to index them into which content to cover say there can be a topic named Copies and Views , under this we can give explanations like No Copy vs Shallow Copy (ie Views) , Shallow Copy (ie views) vs Deep Copy .
Similarly for arrays indexing and other stuff , i mean we need to order and Group(categorize) these Explanations like above .
This way we are basically answering questions , doubts whatever we choose to call them in a structured good guide , because a person coming to this page should know with just a glimpse whether we have an answer / explanation to his doubt by merely looking at the names of the topics covered .
This way our objective of giving solutions for popular queries will surely be covered , What do u say ?

Hello, @mrityagi - I think we talked about this in the documentation meeting but I'm not sure if you intend to follow up on this? If not maybe @Mukulikaa can pick this up. Thanks!

I think this issue can be closed by gh-19791 for now. There is also a separate tracking issue (gh-20112) for future work on this topic.

Agreed, thanks for flagging!