Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Commit 1a0586d

Browse files
anarazelanarazel
committed
Introduce notion of different types of slots (without implementing them).
Upcoming work intends to allow pluggable ways to introduce new ways of storing table data. Accessing those table access methods from the executor requires TupleTableSlots to be carry tuples in the native format of such storage methods; otherwise there'll be a significant conversion overhead. Different access methods will require different data to store tuples efficiently (just like virtual, minimal, heap already require fields in TupleTableSlot). To allow that without requiring additional pointer indirections, we want to have different structs (embedding TupleTableSlot) for different types of slots. Thus different types of slots are needed, which requires adapting creators of slots. The slot that most efficiently can represent a type of tuple in an executor node will often depend on the type of slot a child node uses. Therefore we need to track the type of slot is returned by nodes, so parent slots can create slots based on that. Relatedly, JIT compilation of tuple deforming needs to know which type of slot a certain expression refers to, so it can create an appropriate deforming function for the type of tuple in the slot. But not all nodes will only return one type of slot, e.g. an append node will potentially return different types of slots for each of its subplans. Therefore add function that allows to query the type of a node's result slot, and whether it'll always be the same type (whether it's fixed). This can be queried using ExecGetResultSlotOps(). The scan, result, inner, outer type of slots are automatically inferred from ExecInitScanTupleSlot(), ExecInitResultSlot(), left/right subtrees respectively. If that's not correct for a node, that can be overwritten using new fields in PlanState. This commit does not introduce the actually abstracted implementation of different kind of TupleTableSlots, that will be left for a followup commit. The different types of slots introduced will, for now, still use the same backing implementation. While this already partially invalidates the big comment in tuptable.h, it seems to make more sense to update it later, when the different TupleTableSlot implementations actually exist. Author: Ashutosh Bapat and Andres Freund, with changes by Amit Khandekar Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
1 parent 763f2ed commit 1a0586d

Some content is hidden

Large Commits have some content hidden by default. Use the searchbox below for content that may be hidden.

69 files changed

+478
-176
lines changed

‎src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c

Lines changed: 2 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -4503,7 +4503,8 @@ ProjIndexIsUnchanged(Relation relation, HeapTuple oldtup, HeapTuple newtup)
45034503
List *indexoidlist = RelationGetIndexList(relation);
45044504
EState *estate = CreateExecutorState();
45054505
ExprContext *econtext = GetPerTupleExprContext(estate);
4506-
TupleTableSlot *slot = MakeSingleTupleTableSlot(RelationGetDescr(relation));
4506+
TupleTableSlot *slot = MakeSingleTupleTableSlot(RelationGetDescr(relation),
4507+
&TTSOpsHeapTuple);
45074508
bool equals = true;
45084509
Datum old_values[INDEX_MAX_KEYS];
45094510
bool old_isnull[INDEX_MAX_KEYS];

‎src/backend/catalog/index.c

Lines changed: 6 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -2510,7 +2510,8 @@ IndexBuildHeapRangeScan(Relation heapRelation,
25102510
*/
25112511
estate = CreateExecutorState();
25122512
econtext = GetPerTupleExprContext(estate);
2513-
slot = MakeSingleTupleTableSlot(RelationGetDescr(heapRelation));
2513+
slot = MakeSingleTupleTableSlot(RelationGetDescr(heapRelation),
2514+
&TTSOpsHeapTuple);
25142515

25152516
/* Arrange for econtext's scan tuple to be the tuple under test */
25162517
econtext->ecxt_scantuple = slot;
@@ -2997,7 +2998,8 @@ IndexCheckExclusion(Relation heapRelation,
29972998
*/
29982999
estate = CreateExecutorState();
29993000
econtext = GetPerTupleExprContext(estate);
3000-
slot = MakeSingleTupleTableSlot(RelationGetDescr(heapRelation));
3001+
slot = MakeSingleTupleTableSlot(RelationGetDescr(heapRelation),
3002+
&TTSOpsHeapTuple);
30013003

30023004
/* Arrange for econtext's scan tuple to be the tuple under test */
30033005
econtext->ecxt_scantuple = slot;
@@ -3315,7 +3317,8 @@ validate_index_heapscan(Relation heapRelation,
33153317
*/
33163318
estate = CreateExecutorState();
33173319
econtext = GetPerTupleExprContext(estate);
3318-
slot = MakeSingleTupleTableSlot(RelationGetDescr(heapRelation));
3320+
slot = MakeSingleTupleTableSlot(RelationGetDescr(heapRelation),
3321+
&TTSOpsHeapTuple);
33193322

33203323
/* Arrange for econtext's scan tuple to be the tuple under test */
33213324
econtext->ecxt_scantuple = slot;

‎src/backend/catalog/indexing.c

Lines changed: 2 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -95,7 +95,8 @@ CatalogIndexInsert(CatalogIndexState indstate, HeapTuple heapTuple)
9595
heapRelation = indstate->ri_RelationDesc;
9696

9797
/* Need a slot to hold the tuple being examined */
98-
slot = MakeSingleTupleTableSlot(RelationGetDescr(heapRelation));
98+
slot = MakeSingleTupleTableSlot(RelationGetDescr(heapRelation),
99+
&TTSOpsHeapTuple);
99100
ExecStoreHeapTuple(heapTuple, slot, false);
100101

101102
/*

‎src/backend/commands/analyze.c

Lines changed: 2 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -730,7 +730,8 @@ compute_index_stats(Relation onerel, double totalrows,
730730
estate = CreateExecutorState();
731731
econtext = GetPerTupleExprContext(estate);
732732
/* Need a slot to hold the current heap tuple, too */
733-
slot = MakeSingleTupleTableSlot(RelationGetDescr(onerel));
733+
slot = MakeSingleTupleTableSlot(RelationGetDescr(onerel),
734+
&TTSOpsHeapTuple);
734735

735736
/* Arrange for econtext's scan tuple to be the tuple under test */
736737
econtext->ecxt_scantuple = slot;

‎src/backend/commands/constraint.c

Lines changed: 2 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -122,7 +122,8 @@ unique_key_recheck(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
122122
/*
123123
* The heap tuple must be put into a slot for FormIndexDatum.
124124
*/
125-
slot = MakeSingleTupleTableSlot(RelationGetDescr(trigdata->tg_relation));
125+
slot = MakeSingleTupleTableSlot(RelationGetDescr(trigdata->tg_relation),
126+
&TTSOpsHeapTuple);
126127

127128
ExecStoreHeapTuple(new_row, slot, false);
128129

‎src/backend/commands/copy.c

Lines changed: 4 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -2488,9 +2488,11 @@ CopyFrom(CopyState cstate)
24882488
ExecInitRangeTable(estate, cstate->range_table);
24892489

24902490
/* Set up a tuple slot too */
2491-
myslot = ExecInitExtraTupleSlot(estate, tupDesc);
2491+
myslot = ExecInitExtraTupleSlot(estate, tupDesc,
2492+
&TTSOpsHeapTuple);
24922493
/* Triggers might need a slot as well */
2493-
estate->es_trig_tuple_slot = ExecInitExtraTupleSlot(estate, NULL);
2494+
estate->es_trig_tuple_slot = ExecInitExtraTupleSlot(estate, NULL,
2495+
&TTSOpsHeapTuple);
24942496

24952497
/*
24962498
* Set up a ModifyTableState so we can let FDW(s) init themselves for

‎src/backend/commands/explain.c

Lines changed: 2 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -266,7 +266,8 @@ ExplainQuery(ParseState *pstate, ExplainStmt *stmt, const char *queryString,
266266
Assert(es->indent == 0);
267267

268268
/* output tuples */
269-
tstate = begin_tup_output_tupdesc(dest, ExplainResultDesc(stmt));
269+
tstate = begin_tup_output_tupdesc(dest, ExplainResultDesc(stmt),
270+
&TTSOpsVirtual);
270271
if (es->format == EXPLAIN_FORMAT_TEXT)
271272
do_text_output_multiline(tstate, es->str->data);
272273
else

‎src/backend/commands/functioncmds.c

Lines changed: 2 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -2347,7 +2347,8 @@ ExecuteCallStmt(CallStmt *stmt, ParamListInfo params, bool atomic, DestReceiver
23472347
tupTypmod = HeapTupleHeaderGetTypMod(td);
23482348
retdesc = lookup_rowtype_tupdesc(tupType, tupTypmod);
23492349

2350-
tstate = begin_tup_output_tupdesc(dest, retdesc);
2350+
tstate = begin_tup_output_tupdesc(dest, retdesc,
2351+
&TTSOpsHeapTuple);
23512352

23522353
rettupdata.t_len = HeapTupleHeaderGetDatumLength(td);
23532354
ItemPointerSetInvalid(&(rettupdata.t_self));

‎src/backend/commands/subscriptioncmds.c

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1148,7 +1148,7 @@ fetch_table_list(WalReceiverConn *wrconn, List *publications)
11481148
res->err)));
11491149

11501150
/* Process tables. */
1151-
slot = MakeSingleTupleTableSlot(res->tupledesc);
1151+
slot = MakeSingleTupleTableSlot(res->tupledesc, &TTSOpsMinimalTuple);
11521152
while (tuplestore_gettupleslot(res->tuplestore, true, false, slot))
11531153
{
11541154
char *nspname;

‎src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c

Lines changed: 3 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -4736,8 +4736,8 @@ ATRewriteTable(AlteredTableInfo *tab, Oid OIDNewHeap, LOCKMODE lockmode)
47364736
* tuples are the same, the tupDescs might not be (consider ADD COLUMN
47374737
* without a default).
47384738
*/
4739-
oldslot = MakeSingleTupleTableSlot(oldTupDesc);
4740-
newslot = MakeSingleTupleTableSlot(newTupDesc);
4739+
oldslot = MakeSingleTupleTableSlot(oldTupDesc, &TTSOpsHeapTuple);
4740+
newslot = MakeSingleTupleTableSlot(newTupDesc, &TTSOpsHeapTuple);
47414741

47424742
/* Preallocate values/isnull arrays */
47434743
i = Max(newTupDesc->natts, oldTupDesc->natts);
@@ -8527,7 +8527,7 @@ validateCheckConstraint(Relation rel, HeapTuple constrtup)
85278527

85288528
econtext = GetPerTupleExprContext(estate);
85298529
tupdesc = RelationGetDescr(rel);
8530-
slot = MakeSingleTupleTableSlot(tupdesc);
8530+
slot = MakeSingleTupleTableSlot(tupdesc, &TTSOpsHeapTuple);
85318531
econtext->ecxt_scantuple = slot;
85328532

85338533
snapshot = RegisterSnapshot(GetLatestSnapshot());

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)