Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Commit 943140d

Browse files
committed
Avoid dangling pointer to relation name in RLS code path in DoCopy().
With RLS active, "COPY tab TO ..." failed under -DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE, and would sometimes fail without that, because it used the relation name directly from the relcache as part of the parsetree it's building. That becomes a potentially-dangling pointer as soon as the relcache entry is closed, a bit further down. Typical symptom if the relcache entry chanced to get cleared would be "relation does not exist" error with a garbage relation name, or possibly a core dump; but if you were really truly unlucky, the COPY might copy from the wrong table. Per report from Andrew Dunstan that regression tests fail with -DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE. The core tests now pass for me (but have not tried "make check-world" yet). Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
1 parent 68f7b91 commit 943140d

File tree

1 file changed

+2
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+2
-1
lines changed

src/backend/commands/copy.c

Lines changed: 2 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -938,7 +938,8 @@ DoCopy(const CopyStmt *stmt, const char *queryString, uint64 *processed)
938938
* relation which we have opened and locked.
939939
*/
940940
from = makeRangeVar(get_namespace_name(RelationGetNamespace(rel)),
941-
RelationGetRelationName(rel), -1);
941+
pstrdup(RelationGetRelationName(rel)),
942+
-1);
942943

943944
/* Build query */
944945
select = makeNode(SelectStmt);

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)