Bug report
For some reasons gh-111696 implemented %T# and %N# instead of %#T and %#N. It does not only contradict PEP 737, but does not match the general principles of prinf-like format, and can cause problems in future.
Tests, which were added in gh-111696, were removed in gh-116417, so now this feature is not tested.
Linked PRs
Bug report
For some reasons gh-111696 implemented
%T#and%N#instead of%#Tand%#N. It does not only contradict PEP 737, but does not match the general principles of prinf-like format, and can cause problems in future.Tests, which were added in gh-111696, were removed in gh-116417, so now this feature is not tested.
Linked PRs