-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.9k
Crash on deallocator of type 'time.struct_time' during finalizing for free-threaded Python #122527
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Thanks for the report! |
Bisected to: (oops) |
The problem is in Lines 116 to 131 in 8844197
The GC is clearing the type's dictionary (i.e., The default build works because the GC happens to free the |
You can trigger a similar crash in the default build with some weirder code:
|
The `PyStructSequence` destructor would crash if it was deallocated after its type's dictionary was cleared by the GC, because it couldn't compute the "real size" of the instance. This could occur with relatively straightforward code in the free-threaded build or with a reference cycle involving the type in the default build, due to differing orders in which `tp_clear()` was called. Account for the non-sequence fields in `tp_basicsize` and use that, along with `Py_SIZE()`, to compute the "real" size of a `PyStructSequence` in the dealloc function. This avoids the accesses to the type's dictionary during dealloc, which were unsafe.
The `PyStructSequence` destructor would crash if it was deallocated after its type's dictionary was cleared by the GC, because it couldn't compute the "real size" of the instance. This could occur with relatively straightforward code in the free-threaded build or with a reference cycle involving the type in the default build, due to differing orders in which `tp_clear()` was called. Account for the non-sequence fields in `tp_basicsize` and use that, along with `Py_SIZE()`, to compute the "real" size of a `PyStructSequence` in the dealloc function. This avoids the accesses to the type's dictionary during dealloc, which were unsafe.
…ythonGH-122577) The `PyStructSequence` destructor would crash if it was deallocated after its type's dictionary was cleared by the GC, because it couldn't compute the "real size" of the instance. This could occur with relatively straightforward code in the free-threaded build or with a reference cycle involving the type in the default build, due to differing orders in which `tp_clear()` was called. Account for the non-sequence fields in `tp_basicsize` and use that, along with `Py_SIZE()`, to compute the "real" size of a `PyStructSequence` in the dealloc function. This avoids the accesses to the type's dictionary during dealloc, which were unsafe. (cherry picked from commit 4b63cd1) Co-authored-by: Sam Gross <[email protected]>
…ythonGH-122577) The `PyStructSequence` destructor would crash if it was deallocated after its type's dictionary was cleared by the GC, because it couldn't compute the "real size" of the instance. This could occur with relatively straightforward code in the free-threaded build or with a reference cycle involving the type in the default build, due to differing orders in which `tp_clear()` was called. Account for the non-sequence fields in `tp_basicsize` and use that, along with `Py_SIZE()`, to compute the "real" size of a `PyStructSequence` in the dealloc function. This avoids the accesses to the type's dictionary during dealloc, which were unsafe.
…ythonGH-122577) The `PyStructSequence` destructor would crash if it was deallocated after its type's dictionary was cleared by the GC, because it couldn't compute the "real size" of the instance. This could occur with relatively straightforward code in the free-threaded build or with a reference cycle involving the type in the default build, due to differing orders in which `tp_clear()` was called. Account for the non-sequence fields in `tp_basicsize` and use that, along with `Py_SIZE()`, to compute the "real" size of a `PyStructSequence` in the dealloc function. This avoids the accesses to the type's dictionary during dealloc, which were unsafe.
…H-122577) (#122625) gh-122527: Fix a crash on deallocation of `PyStructSequence` (GH-122577) The `PyStructSequence` destructor would crash if it was deallocated after its type's dictionary was cleared by the GC, because it couldn't compute the "real size" of the instance. This could occur with relatively straightforward code in the free-threaded build or with a reference cycle involving the type in the default build, due to differing orders in which `tp_clear()` was called. Account for the non-sequence fields in `tp_basicsize` and use that, along with `Py_SIZE()`, to compute the "real" size of a `PyStructSequence` in the dealloc function. This avoids the accesses to the type's dictionary during dealloc, which were unsafe. (cherry picked from commit 4b63cd1) Co-authored-by: Sam Gross <[email protected]>
…H-122577) (#122626) The `PyStructSequence` destructor would crash if it was deallocated after its type's dictionary was cleared by the GC, because it couldn't compute the "real size" of the instance. This could occur with relatively straightforward code in the free-threaded build or with a reference cycle involving the type in the default build, due to differing orders in which `tp_clear()` was called. Account for the non-sequence fields in `tp_basicsize` and use that, along with `Py_SIZE()`, to compute the "real" size of a `PyStructSequence` in the dealloc function. This avoids the accesses to the type's dictionary during dealloc, which were unsafe. (cherry picked from commit 4b63cd1)
Crash report
What happened?
A simple standalone file:
If I remove the assignment for
obj
, the program can exit successfully.CPython versions tested on:
CPython main branch, CPython 3.13t, CPython 3.14t
Operating systems tested on:
Linux, macOS
Output from running 'python -VV' on the command line:
Python 3.14.0a0 experimental free-threading build (heads/main:bd3d31f, Aug 1 2024, 01:22:33) [Clang 15.0.0 (clang-1500.3.9.4)]
Linked PRs
PyStructSequence
#122577PyStructSequence
(GH-122577) #122625PyStructSequence
(GH-122577) #122626The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: