-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32k
Make exception wrapping less intrusive for __set_name__ calls #77757
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Type creation currently wraps all exceptions raised by __set_name__ calls with a generic RuntimeError: https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/Objects/typeobject.c#L7263 Unfortunately, this makes it difficult to use __set_name__ for descriptor validation operations, since it means the specific exception type gets lost, and it makes the traceback much harder to read (since the generic error messages appears at the end, while the actual error appears somewhere in the middle). See https://bugs.python.org/issue21145#msg317097 for a specific example. |
Nick, I think the reason this exception wrapping was added is because the stack trace for these exceptions is currently a bit lacking. The "caller" for the For exceptions raised inside For cases where the exception is raised at the caller (e.g. a TypeError due to a In practice I don't know how much of a problem this is; it doesn't seem likely that it would take too long to narrow down the source of the issue. Let me know what you think. |
Hmm, I wonder if the UX problem with the current chaining might be solved in a different way, by doing something similar to what we did for codec exceptions (where we want to try to mention the codec name, but also don't want to change the exception type, and want to include the original exception text in the wrapper's message). The codecs related call is at Line 389 in 0c1c456
Line 2713 in 55edd0c
|
Unconditional replacing an exception is bad, because it can hide important exceptions like KeybordInterrupt or MemoryError. What if raise a new exception only if TypeError was raised? This will cover the case of a __set_name__() method with wrong signature. |
Awkwardly, the motivating use case in bpo-21145 is a TypeError that we wanted to raise within __set_name__, and not have replaced. It feels a little ugly to special case TypeError this way. I like the _PyErr_TrySetFromCause idea. That function is a bit ugly too, in the way it has to try and sniff out whether an exception has extra state or is safe to copy and add extra context to. But in practice I think the results would be pretty good here. Most of the time you’d get the original exception but with added useful context; occasionally for some exception types you might just not get the extra context. But as long as TypeError falls in the former category it would help with the worst case. I’ll look at using that in the PR. |
Yeah, the "transparent exception chaining" code falls into the category of code that I'm both proud of (since it works really well in typical cases [1]) and somewhat horrified by (since the *way* it works tramples over several principles of good object oriented design and is completely non-portable to other Python implementations). Anyway, I've adjusted the issue title here to indicate that we don't want to remove the exception wrapping entirely, just make it less intrusive. [1] See the hex encoding and bz2 decoding failure examples in https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.4.html#codec-handling-improvements |
…ject's __set_name__
…ject's __set_name__ (python#103402)
…ject's __set_name__ (python#103402)
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
bugs.python.org fields:
Linked PRs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: