Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

[3.6] bpo-29607: Fix stack_effect computation for CALL_FUNCTION_EX #219

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2017
Merged

[3.6] bpo-29607: Fix stack_effect computation for CALL_FUNCTION_EX #219

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions Misc/NEWS
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ What's New in Python 3.6.1 release candidate 1?
Core and Builtins
-----------------

- bpo-29607: Fix stack_effect computation for CALL_FUNCTION_EX.
Patch by Matthieu Dartiailh.

- bpo-29602: Fix incorrect handling of signed zeros in complex constructor for
complex subclasses and for inputs having a __complex__ method. Patch
by Serhiy Storchaka.
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion Python/compile.c
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ PyCompile_OpcodeStackEffect(int opcode, int oparg)
case CALL_FUNCTION_KW:
return -oparg-1;
case CALL_FUNCTION_EX:
return - ((oparg & 0x01) != 0) - ((oparg & 0x02) != 0);
return -1 - ((oparg & 0x01) != 0);
case MAKE_FUNCTION:
return -1 - ((oparg & 0x01) != 0) - ((oparg & 0x02) != 0) -
((oparg & 0x04) != 0) - ((oparg & 0x08) != 0);
Expand Down