forked from garrytan/gstack
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathskill-e2e-plan-format.test.ts
More file actions
340 lines (274 loc) · 13.6 KB
/
Copy pathskill-e2e-plan-format.test.ts
File metadata and controls
340 lines (274 loc) · 13.6 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
/**
* AskUserQuestion format regression test for /plan-ceo-review and /plan-eng-review.
*
* Context: a user on Opus 4.7 reported the RECOMMENDATION line and the
* `Completeness: N/10` per-option score stopped appearing on AskUserQuestion
* prompts. This test captures the agent's AskUserQuestion output verbatim
* and asserts the format rule is applied.
*
* Capture shape: `claude -p` sessions inside this harness do not have the
* AskUserQuestion MCP tool wired. We instruct the agent to write the verbatim
* AskUserQuestion text it would have made to $OUT_FILE instead of calling
* any tool. Assertions read that file.
*
* Coverage-vs-kind split: the format rule says to include `Completeness: N/10`
* only when options differ in coverage. When options differ in kind (mode
* selection, posture choice, cherry-pick Add/Defer/Skip), the score is
* intentionally absent and a one-line note explains why. Assertions split
* accordingly.
*/
import { describe, test, expect, beforeAll, afterAll } from 'bun:test';
import { runSkillTest } from './helpers/session-runner';
import {
ROOT, runId,
describeIfSelected, testConcurrentIfSelected,
logCost, assertRecommendationQuality,
createEvalCollector, finalizeEvalCollector,
} from './helpers/e2e-helpers';
import { spawnSync } from 'child_process';
import * as fs from 'fs';
import * as path from 'path';
import * as os from 'os';
const evalCollector = createEvalCollector('e2e-plan-format');
// Regex predicates applied to captured AskUserQuestion content.
// Recommendation-line presence + substance is now graded by judgeRecommendation
// (deterministic regex for present/commits/has_because, Haiku for substance);
// the prior strict `[Rr]ecommendation:[*\s]*Choose` regex pinned down a
// template-example wording ("Choose [X]") that the format spec doesn't require
// — the canonical form per generate-ask-user-format.ts is just
// `Recommendation: <choice> because <reason>`, where <choice> is the bare
// option label. judgeRecommendation.present covers the canonical shape.
// COMPLETENESS regex matches both legacy bare form (`Completeness: 10/10`) and
// the canonical option-prefixed form (`Completeness: A=10/10, B=7/10`) per
// scripts/resolvers/preamble/generate-ask-user-format.ts. The optional
// `[A-Z]=` prefix tolerates either shape; both are acceptable spec output.
const COMPLETENESS_RE = /Completeness:\s*(?:[A-Z]=)?\d{1,2}\/10/;
const KIND_NOTE_RE = /options differ in kind/i;
// v1.7.0.0 Pros/Cons format tokens. Tests are additive: existing
// RECOMMENDATION / Completeness / kind-note assertions still hold; new
// format tokens are asserted ONLY when the capture is from a v1.7+
// skill rendering. Presence is optional for backward compatibility during
// rollout; the periodic-tier cadence+format eval (see skill-e2e-plan-cadence)
// is the strict gate for the new format.
const PROS_CONS_HEADER_RE = /Pros\s*\/\s*cons:/i;
const PRO_BULLET_RE = /^\s*✅\s+\S/m;
const CON_BULLET_RE = /^\s*❌\s+\S/m;
const NET_LINE_RE = /^Net:\s+\S/m;
const D_NUMBER_RE = /^D\d+\s+—/m;
const STAKES_RE = /Stakes if we pick wrong:/i;
const SAMPLE_PLAN = `# Plan: Add User Dashboard
## Context
We're building a new user dashboard that shows recent activity, notifications, and quick actions.
## Changes
1. New React component \`UserDashboard\` in \`src/components/\`
2. REST API endpoint \`GET /api/dashboard\` returning user stats
3. PostgreSQL query for activity aggregation
4. Redis cache layer for dashboard data (5min TTL)
## Architecture
- Frontend: React + TailwindCSS
- Backend: Express.js REST API
- Database: PostgreSQL with existing user/activity tables
- Cache: Redis for dashboard aggregates
`;
function setupPlanDir(tmpPrefix: string, skillName: 'plan-ceo-review' | 'plan-eng-review'): string {
const planDir = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), tmpPrefix));
const run = (cmd: string, args: string[]) =>
spawnSync(cmd, args, { cwd: planDir, stdio: 'pipe', timeout: 5000 });
run('git', ['init', '-b', 'main']);
run('git', ['config', 'user.email', '[email protected]']);
run('git', ['config', 'user.name', 'Test']);
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(planDir, 'plan.md'), SAMPLE_PLAN);
run('git', ['add', '.']);
run('git', ['commit', '-m', 'add plan']);
fs.mkdirSync(path.join(planDir, skillName), { recursive: true });
fs.copyFileSync(
path.join(ROOT, skillName, 'SKILL.md'),
path.join(planDir, skillName, 'SKILL.md'),
);
return planDir;
}
// The capture instruction passed to every case. Tells the agent to dump
// AskUserQuestion content to a file instead of calling a tool.
function captureInstruction(outFile: string): string {
return `Write the verbatim text of every AskUserQuestion you would have made to ${outFile} (one question per session, full text including options and recommendation line). Do NOT call any tool to ask the user. Do NOT paraphrase — include the exact prose you would have shown. This is a format-capture test, not an interactive session.`;
}
// --- Case 1: plan-ceo-review mode selection (kind-differentiated) ---
describeIfSelected('Plan Format — CEO Mode Selection', ['plan-ceo-review-format-mode'], () => {
let planDir: string;
let outFile: string;
beforeAll(() => {
planDir = setupPlanDir('skill-e2e-plan-format-ceo-mode-', 'plan-ceo-review');
outFile = path.join(planDir, 'ask-capture.md');
});
afterAll(() => {
try { fs.rmSync(planDir, { recursive: true, force: true }); } catch {}
});
testConcurrentIfSelected('plan-ceo-review-format-mode', async () => {
const result = await runSkillTest({
prompt: `Read plan-ceo-review/SKILL.md for the review workflow.
Read plan.md — that's the plan to review. This is a standalone plan document, not a codebase — skip any codebase exploration or system audit steps.
Proceed to Step 0F (Mode Selection). This is where the skill presents 4 mode options (SCOPE EXPANSION, SELECTIVE EXPANSION, HOLD SCOPE, SCOPE REDUCTION) to the user via AskUserQuestion. These options differ in kind (review posture), not in coverage.
${captureInstruction(outFile)}
After writing the file, stop. Do not continue the review.`,
workingDirectory: planDir,
maxTurns: 10,
timeout: 240_000,
testName: 'plan-ceo-review-format-mode',
runId,
model: 'claude-opus-4-7',
});
logCost('/plan-ceo-review format (mode)', result);
expect(['success', 'error_max_turns']).toContain(result.exitReason);
expect(fs.existsSync(outFile)).toBe(true);
const captured = fs.readFileSync(outFile, 'utf-8');
expect(captured.length).toBeGreaterThan(100);
// Kind-differentiated: Completeness: N/10 must NOT appear, "options differ
// in kind" note must appear. Recommendation presence is checked by the judge.
expect(captured).not.toMatch(COMPLETENESS_RE);
expect(captured).toMatch(KIND_NOTE_RE);
await assertRecommendationQuality({
captured,
evalCollector,
evalId: '/plan-ceo-review-format-mode',
evalTitle: 'Plan Format — CEO Mode Selection',
result,
passed: ['success', 'error_max_turns'].includes(result.exitReason),
});
}, 300_000);
});
// --- Case 2: plan-ceo-review approach menu (coverage-differentiated) ---
describeIfSelected('Plan Format — CEO Approach Menu', ['plan-ceo-review-format-approach'], () => {
let planDir: string;
let outFile: string;
beforeAll(() => {
planDir = setupPlanDir('skill-e2e-plan-format-ceo-approach-', 'plan-ceo-review');
outFile = path.join(planDir, 'ask-capture.md');
});
afterAll(() => {
try { fs.rmSync(planDir, { recursive: true, force: true }); } catch {}
});
testConcurrentIfSelected('plan-ceo-review-format-approach', async () => {
const result = await runSkillTest({
prompt: `Read plan-ceo-review/SKILL.md for the review workflow.
Read plan.md — that's the plan to review. This is a standalone plan document, not a codebase — skip any codebase exploration or system audit steps.
Proceed to Step 0C-bis (Implementation Alternatives / Approach Menu). This is where the skill generates 2-3 approaches (minimal viable vs ideal architecture) and presents them via AskUserQuestion. These options differ in coverage (complete vs shortcut), so Completeness: N/10 applies.
${captureInstruction(outFile)}
After writing the file, stop. Do not continue the review.`,
workingDirectory: planDir,
maxTurns: 10,
timeout: 240_000,
testName: 'plan-ceo-review-format-approach',
runId,
model: 'claude-opus-4-7',
});
logCost('/plan-ceo-review format (approach)', result);
expect(['success', 'error_max_turns']).toContain(result.exitReason);
expect(fs.existsSync(outFile)).toBe(true);
const captured = fs.readFileSync(outFile, 'utf-8');
expect(captured.length).toBeGreaterThan(100);
// Coverage-differentiated: Completeness: N/10 required. Recommendation
// presence checked by the judge.
expect(captured).toMatch(COMPLETENESS_RE);
await assertRecommendationQuality({
captured,
evalCollector,
evalId: '/plan-ceo-review-format-approach',
evalTitle: 'Plan Format — CEO Approach Menu',
result,
passed: ['success', 'error_max_turns'].includes(result.exitReason),
});
}, 300_000);
});
// --- Case 3: plan-eng-review coverage-differentiated per-issue AskUserQuestion ---
describeIfSelected('Plan Format — Eng Coverage Issue', ['plan-eng-review-format-coverage'], () => {
let planDir: string;
let outFile: string;
beforeAll(() => {
planDir = setupPlanDir('skill-e2e-plan-format-eng-cov-', 'plan-eng-review');
outFile = path.join(planDir, 'ask-capture.md');
});
afterAll(() => {
try { fs.rmSync(planDir, { recursive: true, force: true }); } catch {}
});
testConcurrentIfSelected('plan-eng-review-format-coverage', async () => {
const result = await runSkillTest({
prompt: `Read plan-eng-review/SKILL.md for the review workflow.
Read plan.md — that's the plan to review. This is a standalone plan document, not a codebase — skip any codebase exploration steps.
During your review (Section 3 Test Review is the natural place), generate ONE AskUserQuestion about test coverage depth where the options are clearly coverage-differentiated. For example:
A) Full coverage: happy path + edge cases + error paths (Completeness 10/10)
B) Happy path only (Completeness 7/10)
C) Smoke test (Completeness 3/10)
${captureInstruction(outFile)}
After writing the file with that ONE question, stop. Do not continue the review.`,
workingDirectory: planDir,
maxTurns: 10,
timeout: 240_000,
testName: 'plan-eng-review-format-coverage',
runId,
model: 'claude-opus-4-7',
});
logCost('/plan-eng-review format (coverage)', result);
expect(['success', 'error_max_turns']).toContain(result.exitReason);
expect(fs.existsSync(outFile)).toBe(true);
const captured = fs.readFileSync(outFile, 'utf-8');
expect(captured.length).toBeGreaterThan(100);
// Coverage-differentiated: Completeness: N/10 required. Recommendation
// presence checked by the judge.
expect(captured).toMatch(COMPLETENESS_RE);
await assertRecommendationQuality({
captured,
evalCollector,
evalId: '/plan-eng-review-format-coverage',
evalTitle: 'Plan Format — Eng Coverage Issue',
result,
passed: ['success', 'error_max_turns'].includes(result.exitReason),
});
}, 300_000);
});
// --- Case 4: plan-eng-review kind-differentiated per-issue AskUserQuestion ---
describeIfSelected('Plan Format — Eng Kind Issue', ['plan-eng-review-format-kind'], () => {
let planDir: string;
let outFile: string;
beforeAll(() => {
planDir = setupPlanDir('skill-e2e-plan-format-eng-kind-', 'plan-eng-review');
outFile = path.join(planDir, 'ask-capture.md');
});
afterAll(() => {
try { fs.rmSync(planDir, { recursive: true, force: true }); } catch {}
});
testConcurrentIfSelected('plan-eng-review-format-kind', async () => {
const result = await runSkillTest({
prompt: `Read plan-eng-review/SKILL.md for the review workflow.
Read plan.md — that's the plan to review. This is a standalone plan document, not a codebase — skip any codebase exploration steps.
During your review (Section 1 Architecture), generate ONE AskUserQuestion about an architectural choice where the options differ in kind, not in coverage. For example, "should we use Redis or Postgres for the cache layer?" — the options are different kinds of systems with different tradeoffs, not more-or-less-complete versions of the same thing.
${captureInstruction(outFile)}
After writing the file with that ONE question, stop. Do not continue the review.`,
workingDirectory: planDir,
maxTurns: 10,
timeout: 240_000,
testName: 'plan-eng-review-format-kind',
runId,
model: 'claude-opus-4-7',
});
logCost('/plan-eng-review format (kind)', result);
expect(['success', 'error_max_turns']).toContain(result.exitReason);
expect(fs.existsSync(outFile)).toBe(true);
const captured = fs.readFileSync(outFile, 'utf-8');
expect(captured.length).toBeGreaterThan(100);
// Kind-differentiated: Completeness: N/10 must NOT appear, "options differ
// in kind" note must appear. Recommendation presence checked by the judge.
expect(captured).not.toMatch(COMPLETENESS_RE);
expect(captured).toMatch(KIND_NOTE_RE);
await assertRecommendationQuality({
captured,
evalCollector,
evalId: '/plan-eng-review-format-kind',
evalTitle: 'Plan Format — Eng Kind Issue',
result,
passed: ['success', 'error_max_turns'].includes(result.exitReason),
});
}, 300_000);
});
afterAll(async () => {
await finalizeEvalCollector(evalCollector);
});