Replies: 1 comment
|
An apparent lag usually comes from the forecasting setup rather than an SVR-specific delay. I would check the target alignment first: each row built from information through time If alignment is correct, the usual cause is a persistence-heavy feature set. Lagged target values plus an RBF SVR often learn a smooth version of “the next value will resemble the recent past,” so turning points are followed late. Increasing model complexity may reduce training error without fixing that behavior out of sample. A useful diagnostic sequence is:
Also fit a simple linear autoregression on the same windows. If SVR and the linear baseline both lag, the limiting factor is probably the information in the features, not the estimator. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hello everyone,
I’m working on a time series prediction problem using SVR (Support Vector Regression). While testing the model, I noticed that the predicted values consistently lag behind the actual values.
The predictions seem to follow the trend correctly, but they are slightly delayed when compared to the ground truth.
Has anyone else encountered this issue? What could be the reasons for this lag, and are there any specific techniques or preprocessing steps to resolve it?
Thanks in advance for your insights!
All reactions