-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.8k
MultiOutputRegressor: Support for more fit parameters #15953
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
I'd happily see a pull request for this
|
I like this features request. Is |
As far as I am working on the pr #15995, I haven't yet considered passing a |
@armgilles Support for |
@armgilles Yes, It it should be #15959. Sorry for the misspell of the no pr. |
Any update on this? Would be a great feature to have. |
It was merged in #15959 |
Hi! I believe the current implementation still does not support passing the For example:
Result:
As you can see, the target of Versions: |
In this case, To be fully generic, we would need to accept a |
Now fixed with metadata routing. |
Description
This is a feature wanted. Till latest version of
sklearn
, theMultiOutputRegressor.fit
only support a optionalsample_weight
parameter. It would be nice if it support another optionalfit_param
parameter, which will enhance theestimator.fit
. For example, we can uselightgbm
orxgboost
early stopping fitting way to overcome the over-fitting issue.I know it is a little bit complicated to realize that. But I I hope you will consider that. Thanks!
Steps/Code to Reproduce
This is my expected usage example.
Expected Results
Unsupported yet.
Actual Results
Unsupported yet.
Versions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: